mcpbeat Sign in

Ad To Landing Page Auditor Agent Skill

> Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
2
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
1086
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor

What comes with it

320 bytes besides the instruction
skill.meta.json

The instruction itself

13 sections, as written by the author

Ad-to-Landing Page Auditor

The #1 reason ads get clicks but not conversions: the landing page doesn't deliver on the ad's promise. This skill audits the full click path — from ad copy to landing page experience — and flags every disconnect.

Core principle: A great ad with a mismatched landing page is worse than a mediocre ad with a matched one. Message match is the single biggest conversion lever most startups ignore.

When to Use

  • "Why are my ads getting clicks but no conversions?"
  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page flow"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "My conversion rate is low — help me figure out why"
  • "Review our landing pages for our ad campaigns"

Phase 0: Intake

  • Ad copy — For each ad, provide:
  • Headline(s)
  • Body / description text
  • CTA text
  • Platform (Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn)
  • Landing page URLs — The URL each ad points to
  • Conversion goal — What should happen after someone clicks? (Demo / Trial / Purchase / Download)
  • Known conversion rates? — Current click → conversion rate per ad/LP (if available)

If the user has a CSV export from their ad platform, parse that instead.

Phase 1: Ad Inventory

Parse the provided ads into:

| Ad ID | Platform | Headline | Body/Description | CTA | Landing Page URL | Conv Rate (if known) |

|-------|----------|----------|-----------------|-----|-----------------|---------------------|

Phase 2: Landing Page Audit

For each unique landing page URL, fetch the page content:

fetch_webpage: [landing_page_url]

If fetch_webpage is not available, use curl to retrieve the page HTML.

Extract and score:

2A: Content Elements

| Element | Found? | Content |

|---------|--------|---------|

| Hero headline | [Y/N] | "[Text]" |

| Subheadline | [Y/N] | "[Text]" |

| Primary CTA | [Y/N] | "[Button text]" |

| CTA above fold | [Y/N] | — |

| Social proof | [Y/N] | [Logos / testimonials / metrics] |

| Benefit list | [Y/N] | [Key benefits listed] |

| Form / Sign-up | [Y/N] | [Field count: N] |

| Video | [Y/N] | — |

| Trust signals | [Y/N] | [Security badges, guarantees] |

2B: Message Match Scoring

For each ad → landing page pair, score on:

| Dimension | Score (1-10) | Criteria |

|-----------|-------------|----------|

| Promise continuity | [X] | Does the LP headline deliver on the ad's promise? |

| Language match | [X] | Does the LP use the same words/phrases as the ad? |

| Visual continuity | [X] | Does the LP feel like a continuation of the ad? (Not assessable for search) |

| CTA alignment | [X] | Does the LP's ask match what the ad implied? |

| Specificity match | [X] | If the ad was specific ("for sales teams"), is the LP specific too? |

| Emotional match | [X] | If the ad used fear/urgency, does the LP carry that forward? |

Message Match Score: [Average/60]

Scoring Guide

| Score | Rating | Meaning |

|-------|--------|---------|

| 50-60 | Excellent | Strong match — LP delivers on every ad promise |

| 40-49 | Good | Minor disconnects but overall coherent |

| 30-39 | Needs work | Noticeable gaps — visitor has to hunt for relevance |

| 20-29 | Poor | Ad and LP feel like different products |

| Below 20 | Critical | Complete mismatch — fix immediately |

Phase 3: Conversion Friction Analysis

Beyond message match, assess landing page conversion friction:

| Friction Type | Check | Status |

|--------------|-------|--------|

| Load time | Does the page feel heavy/slow? (Asset count proxy) | [Fast/Slow/Unknown] |

| Form length | How many fields before conversion? | [N fields] — [Appropriate/Too many] |

| CTA clarity | Is there one clear CTA or competing actions? | [Clear/Cluttered] |

| Above-fold conversion | Can someone convert without scrolling? | [Yes/No] |

| Social proof placement | Is proof near the CTA? | [Yes/No] |

| Navigation distraction | Does the LP have full site nav? (Should be minimal) | [Minimal/Full nav] |

| Mobile experience | Any mobile-unfriendly elements? | [Good/Issues] |

Phase 4: Output Format

# Ad-to-Landing Page Audit — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Ads audited: [N]
Unique landing pages: [N]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Overall message match: [Score/60] — [Rating]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-4 sentences: Overall finding, biggest disconnect, top recommendation, estimated conversion impact]

---

## Audit Results by Ad → Landing Page Pair

### Ad 1: "[Ad headline excerpt]"
**Platform:** [Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn]
**Ad copy:**
> Headline: "[text]"
> Body: "[text]"
> CTA: "[text]"

**Landing page:** [URL]
> LP headline: "[text]"
> LP subhead: "[text]"
> LP CTA: "[button text]"

**Message Match Score: [X/60] — [Rating]**

| Dimension | Score | Issue |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Promise continuity | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Language match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| CTA alignment | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Specificity match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Emotional match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |

**Disconnect found:** [Specific description of mismatch]
**Recommended fix:** [Specific change to ad or LP]

### Ad 2: ...

---

## Landing Page Friction Report

### [Landing Page URL]
| Friction Point | Status | Impact | Fix |
|---------------|--------|--------|-----|
| [Friction] | [Red/Yellow/Green] | [High/Med/Low] | [Specific fix] |

---

## Priority Fixes

### Critical (Fix This Week)
1. **[Ad/LP pair]:** [Specific mismatch] → [Specific fix]
   - Est. conversion impact: [X% improvement]

### Important (Fix This Month)
2. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

### Nice-to-Have
3. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

---

## Rewrite Suggestions

### For [Ad or LP with worst match]:

**Current ad headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested ad headline:** "[rewrite that matches LP]"

OR

**Current LP headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested LP headline:** "[rewrite that matches ad]"

Save to ad-lp-audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

| Component | Cost |

|-----------|------|

| Landing page fetching | Free |

| Analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |

| Total | Free |

Tools Required

  • fetch_webpage or curl — for landing page analysis
  • No API keys required

Trigger Phrases

  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page match"
  • "Why is my conversion rate so low?"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "Do our landing pages match our ads?"
  • "Run a CRO audit on our ad funnels"

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Internal Comms
by anthropics
vendor ×13

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

6k tokens
Competitive Ads Extractor
by frostant
×10

Extracts and analyzes competitors' ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand what messaging, problems, and creative approaches are working. Helps inspire and improve your own ad campaigns.

2k tokens
Lead Research Assistant
by frostant
×8

Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.

2k tokens
Developer Growth Analysis
by frostant
×6

Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.

4k tokens
App Store Optimization
by alirezarezvani
×3

Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store

55k tokens scripts
Deeptools
by christophacham
×3

NGS analysis toolkit. BAM to bigWig conversion, QC (correlation, PCA, fingerprints), heatmaps/profiles (TSS, peaks), for ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, ATAC-seq visualization.

21k tokens scripts
Pymatgen
by christophacham
×3

Materials science toolkit. Crystal structures (CIF, POSCAR), phase diagrams, band structure, DOS, Materials Project integration, format conversion, for computational materials science.

26k tokens scripts
Enhance Prompt
by google-labs-code
vendor ×2

Transforms vague UI ideas into polished, Stitch-optimized prompts. Enhances specificity, adds UI/UX keywords, injects design system context, and structures output for better generation results.

3k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take gooseworks-ai/ad-to-landing-page-auditor from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.