> Optimizes raw idea descriptions into structured prompts ready for the brainstorming workflow. "make this ready for brainstorming", "imposta per brainstorm", or wants to improve a feature idea before using /specs.brainstorm. DO NOT TRIGGER for code optimization, refactoring, or general prompt engineering tasks.
npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill brainstorm-prompt-optimizer
Transform a raw idea into an optimized prompt ready for the brainstorming workflow (/specs.brainstorm).
This skill prepares ideas so that when passed to /specs.brainstorm, they produce better functional specifications
following EARS syntax, proper acceptance criteria taxonomy, and complete Non-Goals/Negative Requirements sections.
/specs.brainstormspecs.change-specOutput ONLY the optimized prompt — no analysis, no reports, no recommendations.
The workflow transforms a raw idea into a structured prompt that will produce better functional specifications when
used with /specs.brainstorm.
Check for project files to understand the environment:
CLAUDE.md → project conventionsdocs/specs/architecture.md → existing architecture constraintsdocs/specs/ontology.md → existing domain termsTech stack detection:
package.json → Node.js/TypeScript/Reactpom.xml / build.gradle → Java/Spring Bootrequirements.txt / pyproject.toml → PythonParse the raw idea to identify:
Estimate complexity to help /specs.brainstorm:
Build a structured prompt with these components (aligned with /specs.brainstorm template):
# [Core Action] — [Target Domain]
## Problem Statement
[What problem does this solve? Who has it?]
## Core Feature
[What should the system do? Focus on behavior, not implementation]
## Target Users
[Who will use this? What's their goal?]
## User Flows
1. [Primary flow from user perspective]
2. [Alternative flows if applicable]
## Data Requirements
- [What data the feature needs to work with]
- [Any data relationships]
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] [Testable criterion that requires code/implementation]
- [SEF] [Side-effect criterion - automatic consequence]
- [EXT] [External verification criterion]
## Non-Goals
- **Feature X**: [Brief explanation why excluded]
- **Feature Y**: [Brief explanation why excluded]
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT [security/data integrity constraint]
## [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] (max 3)
- [Specific question that significantly impacts scope]
Present the complete optimized prompt in a fenced code block with the label optimized-prompt:
[Full optimized prompt content]
Use EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) for requirements:
| Form | Pattern | Example |
|------|---------|---------|
| Event-driven | WHEN <event> THEN the system SHALL <action> | WHEN the user clicks "Submit" THEN the system SHALL validate the form data |
| State-driven | WHEN <system state> THEN the system SHALL <action> | WHEN the session expires THEN the system SHALL clear user data |
| Generic | The system SHALL <action> | The system SHALL encrypt all stored passwords with bcrypt |
| Feature | IF <feature> THEN the system SHALL <action> | IF multi-factor auth is enabled THEN the system SHALL require second factor |
| Negative | IF <unwanted condition> THEN the system SHALL NOT <action> | IF SQL input detected THEN the system SHALL reject with 400 |
Mandatory keywords: SHALL, WILL, MAY
Forbidden words: "robust", "intuitive", "fast", "scalable", "efficient", "user-friendly"
Every success criterion MUST be tagged:
| Tag | Meaning | Generates Tasks? |
|-----|---------|------------------|
| [IMP] | Requires new code, configuration, or explicit behavior | YES |
| [SEF] | Natural automatic consequence of an [IMP] criterion | NO (verify in e2e) |
| [EXT] | Verified by external tools or user observation | NO (e2e checkpoint) |
60% Rule: At least 60% of criteria should be [IMP].
# Add [Feature] — User Management
## Problem Statement
[Describe the problem users face without this feature]
## Core Feature
The system SHALL [describe what the feature does, focus on behavior]
## Target Users
- **Primary**: [main user type]
- **Secondary**: [other affected users]
## User Flows
1. **Primary Flow**: [Step by step from user perspective]
2. **Alternative Flow**: [If applicable]
## Data Requirements
- User entity: [fields]
- [Other entities involved]
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] [Criterion 1 — testable outcome requiring code]
- [IMP] [Criterion 2]
- [SEF] [Criterion 3 — automatic consequence]
- [EXT] [Criterion 4 — verified externally]
## Non-Goals
- **Social Login**: No OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, etc.)
- **Password Reset**: Not included in this specification
- **Two-Factor Auth**: Not included in this specification
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT store passwords in plain text; it SHALL use bcrypt with cost factor ≥12
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT expose user existence through login error messages
# [Feature Name] — API Layer
## Problem Statement
[What integration need or capability gap exists]
## Core Feature
The system SHALL provide [describe the API behavior]
## Target Users
- **Primary**: [API consumers]
- **Secondary**: [administrators]
## User Flows
1. **Happy Path**: [Request → Validation → Response]
2. **Error Path**: [Invalid input → Error response]
## API Contract
- Endpoint: [path and method]
- Input: [what the API receives]
- Output: [what the API returns]
- Error cases: [failure modes with codes]
## Data Model
- [Entities involved]
- [Relationships]
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] [Criterion 1]
- [IMP] [Criterion 2]
- [SEF] [Criterion 3]
## Non-Goals
- **GraphQL**: REST only
- **Async Processing**: Synchronous only
- **Caching**: Not included
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: IF user input is used in SQL query THEN the system SHALL NOT concatenate directly
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT expose internal error details to clients
# [Feature Name] — User Interface
## Problem Statement
[What user experience gap exists]
## Core Feature
The user SHALL be able to [describe user action and system response]
## Target Users
- **Primary**: [end users]
- **Secondary**: [admin users if applicable]
## User Flows
1. **Entry**: [How user accesses this feature]
2. **Interaction**: [Primary user action]
3. **Outcome**: [Result user sees]
4. **Error**: [Error handling for invalid input]
## UI Requirements
- Layout: [description]
- Components: [key UI elements]
- Feedback: [success/error/loading states]
## Responsive Behavior
- Desktop: [behavior]
- Mobile: [behavior]
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] [Criterion 1 — visible behavior]
- [IMP] [Criterion 2]
- [IMP] [Criterion 3]
- [SEF] [Criterion 4 — automatic]
## Non-Goals
- **Real-time Updates**: No WebSocket or SSE
- **Offline Mode**: Not included
- **Accessibility Features**: [specific exclusions]
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT display raw error messages to users
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT allow XSS through user input fields
# [Feature Name] — Data Processing
## Problem Statement
[What data challenge exists]
## Core Feature
The system SHALL [describe data transformation/processing behavior]
## Target Users
- **Primary**: [who benefits]
- **Secondary**: [who monitors]
## User Flows
1. **Data Input**: [Source and format]
2. **Processing**: [Transformation steps]
3. **Output**: [Result destination and format]
## Data Quality
- Validation: [rules]
- Error handling: [for bad data]
## Performance Constraints
- Volume: [expected data size]
- Latency: [expected processing time]
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] [Criterion 1]
- [IMP] [Criterion 2]
- [EXT] [Criterion 3 — external verification]
## Non-Goals
- **Real-time Processing**: Batch only
- **Data Export**: Not included
- **Backup/Restore**: Not included
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT lose data on processing failure
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT process unbounded data without pagination
Input:
Add user authentication
Output:
# Add User Authentication — Authentication Layer
## Problem Statement
Users cannot securely access the system. They need a way to prove their identity and access their personalized content.
## Core Feature
The system SHALL provide email/password authentication that allows users to:
- Register with a valid email address and secure password
- Log in with registered credentials
- Maintain an authenticated session across requests
- Log out to terminate their session
## Target Users
- **Primary**: End users who need to access personalized features
- **Secondary**: Administrators who manage user accounts
## User Flows
1. **Registration**: User enters email → receives confirmation → sets password → account created
2. **Login**: User enters credentials → validated → session established → redirected to dashboard
3. **Logout**: User clicks logout → session terminated → redirected to login page
## Data Requirements
- User entity: email, hashed_password, created_at, updated_at
- Session entity: user_id, token, expiration
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] Users can register with email/password
- [IMP] Users can log in with valid credentials
- [IMP] Invalid credentials show generic error message
- [IMP] Users can log out
- [IMP] Session persists across page navigation
- [IMP] Expired sessions require re-login
## Non-Goals
- **Social Login**: No OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, etc.)
- **Password Reset**: Not included in this specification
- **Two-Factor Authentication**: Not included in this specification
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT store passwords in plain text; it SHALL use bcrypt with cost factor ≥12
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT expose user existence through login error messages; it SHALL use generic "invalid credentials" for both cases
- REQ-NR003: The system SHALL NOT allow weak passwords (minimum 8 characters, mixed case, number)
Input:
Better search for products
Output:
# Improve Product Search — Product Discovery
## Problem Statement
Users cannot find products they are looking for using the current search. Results are not relevant, don't match user intent, and sorting is not useful.
## Core Feature
The system SHALL provide enhanced product search that allows users to:
- Search products by name, description, and category
- Receive results ranked by relevance to search terms
- Filter results by category, price range, and availability
- Sort results by relevance, price, or newest
## Target Users
- **Primary**: Shoppers looking for specific products
- **Secondary**: Browsers exploring product catalog
## User Flows
1. **Direct Search**: User enters search terms → results displayed → user selects product
2. **Filtered Search**: User enters terms → applies filters → refined results → user selects product
3. **Empty Results**: User enters terms → no results → suggestion displayed
## Search Behavior
- Minimum 2 characters to trigger search
- Partial word matching for product names
- Search across: product name, description, category name, tags
- Results limited to 50 per page with pagination
## Filtering Options
- Category: single or multiple selection
- Price range: min/max with validation
- Availability: in-stock only toggle
## Sorting Options
- Relevance (default): based on search term match score
- Price: low-to-high or high-to-low
- Newest: by creation date descending
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] Search returns products matching the query terms
- [IMP] Search supports partial word matching
- [IMP] Category filter limits results to selected category
- [IMP] Price range filter shows products within min/max bounds
- [IMP] Results can be sorted by relevance, price, or date
- [IMP] Pagination allows navigation through large result sets
- [IMP] Empty search shows appropriate message with suggestions
## Non-Goals
- **Autocomplete**: Not included in this specification
- **Search Analytics**: Not included in this specification
- **Personalized Results**: Results are the same for all users
- **Image Search**: Not included in this specification
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT expose product inventory details in search results unless explicitly needed
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT allow SQL injection through search terms; it SHALL sanitize all input
- REQ-NR003: The system SHALL NOT return results beyond configured pagination limits per request
Input:
Implement Redis caching for API responses
Output:
# Implement API Response Caching — Performance Optimization
## Problem Statement
The API is slow for frequently requested data. Repeated requests for the same resources consume unnecessary server resources and increase response times for users.
## Core Feature
The system SHALL cache frequently accessed API responses to reduce response times and server load:
- Cache GET requests for defined intervals
- Return cached responses when data hasn't changed
- Invalidate cache when underlying data changes
- Provide cache statistics for monitoring
## Target Users
- **Primary**: API consumers (frontend applications, mobile apps)
- **Secondary**: System administrators monitoring performance
## Cache Behavior
- Cache key based on request URL and parameters
- Default TTL: 5 minutes (configurable per endpoint)
- Cache stores: response body, status code, headers
- Cache miss: fetch from source, store, return
## Invalidation Rules
- Cache invalidated when source data is modified via POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE
- Manual invalidation available via admin endpoint
- Bulk invalidation by cache key pattern
## Success Criteria
- [IMP] Cached requests return within 50ms
- [IMP] Cache hit rate visible in metrics
- [IMP] Manual cache invalidation works
- [IMP] Automatic invalidation on data changes
- [IMP] Cache can be disabled per request via header
- [SEF] Cache reduces database load for repeated requests
- [EXT] Response time improvement measurable via APM
## Non-Goals
- **Distributed Cache**: Single Redis instance only
- **Cache Warming**: Not included
- **Cache Partitioning**: Not included
- **Multi-Tenant Isolation**: Not included in this specification
## Negative Requirements
- REQ-NR001: The system SHALL NOT cache responses containing user-specific data
- REQ-NR002: The system SHALL NOT serve stale cache beyond configured TTL
- REQ-NR003: The system SHALL NOT expose cache internals in API responses
- REQ-NR004: IF cache connection fails THEN the system SHALL fall back to direct database access without error
The optimized prompt should be used directly with /specs.brainstorm:
# Copy the optimized prompt and use it with brainstorm
/specs.brainstorm [paste optimized prompt here]
Raw Idea → brainstorm-prompt-optimizer → Optimized Prompt → /specs.brainstorm → Functional Spec → /specs.spec-to-tasks → Tasks
specs.change-spec[IMP], [SEF], or [EXT][NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers| Component | When to Use |
|-----------|-------------|
| /specs.brainstorm | After optimization, run brainstorm to create specification |
| /specs.spec-to-tasks | Convert specification to executable tasks |
| specs-change-spec | For bug fixes or delta changes (not new features) |
| specs-brainstorm | Reference for functional specification template |
Complete development kit for Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with three comprehensive workflows (basic, advanced, validation), TypeSpec support, and Microsoft 365 Agents Toolkit integration
Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and release gates—not for clinical decision-making.
> provider/change budget/修改卖家/修改预算/draft/草稿/我的任务/my tasks/what am I working on/关闭/取消任务/决策列表/decision list/指定服务商/browse (sender.role = COUNTERPARTY, not you); (3) literal "Read the okx-ai skill" (or legacy "Read the okx-agent-task skill") in the envelope.
Automate payer review of prior authorization (PA) requests. This skill should be used when users say "Review this PA request", "Process prior authorization for [procedure]", "Assess medical necessity", "Generate PA decision", or when processing clinical documentation for coverage policy validation and authorization decisions.
Expert in designing and building autonomous AI agents. Masters tool use, memory systems, planning strategies, and multi-agent orchestration.
Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.
Orchestrates design workflows by routing work through brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution readiness in the correct order.
Structured persuasion for tech leads, PMs, and founders—not activity logs. Five scenarios (kickoff, status update, wrap-up, investor pitch, solution selling) on one 5-part framework (Hook→Context→Proposal→Evidence→Ask). AI prompts for missing materials and audience context; pre-submit checklist. Claude Code plugin; Cursor, Codex, and chat via prompts.
Take giuseppe-trisciuoglio/brainstorm-prompt-optimizer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.