Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent''s reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill copilot-pr-autopilot
Drive any GitHub pull request through repeated rounds of Copilot code
review until the agent has done its job — every Copilot finding has
a reply from the agent (fix-acknowledgement, decline-with-rationale,
or explicit escalate-to-user hand-off). Remaining open threads, if
any, are deliberate hand-offs to the human merge owner — they're
not loop failures. Repository-agnostic — works on any repo that has
Copilot Code Review enabled, run from a machine with gh CLI
installed and authenticated (see Prerequisites).
on a PR.
via repeated automated review rounds.
triage, fixing, replying, and resolving.
otherwise findings churn round-over-round.
gh CLI installed and authenticated against the target repository.powershell.exe) orPowerShell 7+ (pwsh). Both are tested.
01-request-review.ps1uses GraphQL requestReviewsByLogin to trigger Copilot). It is
NOT a hard requirement — if 01-request-review.ps1 fails
because Copilot isn't enabled on the repo / account, the agent can
still drive existing review threads (human, advanced-security, etc.)
to completion by running steps 3–8 once as a single iteration; just
skip the trigger + wait. There is no auto-detect for "Copilot
unavailable" — the agent makes that decision after the trigger
fails (the script can't reliably tell "Copilot disabled" from
"Copilot enabled but not yet triggered" from API state alone).
The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs Triage or Write permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (requestReviewsByLogin) is gated on that permission. Verified against the public REST + GraphQL surface in this PR's commit history — there is no public-API path for bot reviewers without write permission.
| You are… | What works |
|---|---|
| Repo collaborator with Triage / Write | Full loop: 01 triggers Copilot, 02 waits, 04–08 triage / fix / reply, loop back to 01. Hands-off. |
| External PR author (no write permission) | 01 will throw a clear actionable error. Use -SingleIteration mode: address all current findings in one pass, then either click the UI 🔄 next to Copilot, or push a substantive commit (the synchronize event auto-triggers Copilot on most repos). Then re-run 02 to verify. |
In single-iteration mode the loop's convergence boolean is Converged: true iff OpenThreadsAwaitingReply == 0 (the agent's side is done). The maintainer-side re-trigger then drives any additional rounds.
Every script dot-sources scripts/_lib.ps1 which
runs Assert-GhReady on load: if gh is missing OR gh auth status
fails, the script halts before any work with a single actionable
error message naming the install command and gh auth login. The
agent should surface that message to the user verbatim and stop the
loop — do not retry or work around it.
> The loop: steps 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9, then back to step 1 if Converged: false. Repeat the 1→9 round until step 9 returns Converged: true; only then run step 10 once and call task_complete. At every 10th round, the parent runs the round-cap recap gate before looping back — recap all prior rounds and stop if the loop has drifted out of the PR's original scope.
Each round runs steps 1–9; step 10 is a one-time cleanup after convergence. The parent agent coordinates; every sub-agent step runs in a fresh context with a bounded budget. Cross-cutting protocol (time-boxing, extension, single-iteration fallback): orchestration.md.
Converged: false → loop back to step 1 for another round (re-trigger, wait, list, triage, fix, push, reply, re-check). Each round addresses Copilot's findings on the previous round's HEAD; the loop terminates as soon as Copilot has nothing new to say AND every open thread has a reply from the agent.Converged: true → exit the loop, run step 10 once, call task_complete with the proof.10. Cleanup outdated _(parent, post-convergence, once)_ — see 10-cleanup.md
Convergence is computed by scripts/02-check-review-status.ps1 as a single Converged: true boolean. Do not call task_complete until it returns true; print the proof (HeadOid, LatestCopilotReview.commitOid, submittedAt) in the completion message.
The bundled scripts enforce the hard correctness invariants (trigger landing via copilot_work_started event id, Converged requiring HEAD-match + zero-awaiting + at-HEAD review, single-iteration fallback semantics, PR-state guard). Trust them — don't re-derive. The notes below cover decisions the scripts can't make for you:
fix and decline threads, reply + resolve. For escalate-to-user threads, reply with the analysis but leave the thread OPEN (08-reply-and-resolve.ps1 -NoResolve) so the human merge owner can act on it. See 08-reply-resolve.md.escalate-to-user. Auto-resolving a human review thread can hide unaddressed concerns. See 04-triage.md for the rubric.git bisect. See 07-commit-push.md.CONTRIBUTING / AGENTS / README / package.json / Makefile) before pushing a fix. Discovery procedure: 06-build-test.md.decline path in 04-triage.md.gh api graphql -F type-coercion, git stash push -m positional parsing, the three GraphQL traps for the reviewer mutation) are documented in references/api-quirks.md. Read before modifying any script.| Issue | Solution |
|-------|----------|
| Script throws prerequisite missing — gh CLI is not on PATH | Install gh (winget install GitHub.cli on Windows; brew install gh on macOS; package manager on Linux; or download from https://cli.github.com). Then gh auth login. Surface the message to the user and STOP the loop — do not retry. |
| Script throws prerequisite missing — gh CLI is not authenticated | Run gh auth login. STOP the loop until the user completes auth. |
| Trigger fails or no copilot_work_started event lands | Push a substantive (non-whitespace) commit — auto-assign on synchronize is the most reliable trigger. Persistent failure indicates Copilot Code Review may not be enabled on the repo / account (check repo Settings → Code & automation → Copilot, or account-level Copilot Pro/Pro+). |
| No new review after waiting ~10 min | Quiet-period after recent dismissal or trivial-diff suppression. Push a substantive commit and retry. Do not blindly re-run 01-request-review.ps1 — it reports InFlight while Copilot is still a requested reviewer. |
| Outdated-but-unresolved threads in the open list | Expected: unresolved state is the source of truth. Reply + resolve them like any other open thread. 10-cleanup-outdated.ps1 is only a final safety net. |
| Unsure whether to fix or decline a finding | See references/04-triage.md. |
| Need a reply phrasing for "fixed", "declined", or "drift" | See the templates under templates/ — reply-fix.md, reply-decline.md, reply-drift.md, reply-partial.md. |
cross-cutting loop control: time-boxing & extension protocol,
sub-agent delegation map, single-iteration fallback, and loop-wide
notes.
NN-*.md per step):references/01-request-review.md _(parent)_,
references/02-wait.md,
references/03-list-threads.md,
references/04-triage.md (includes the
fix-vs-decline rubric),
references/05-fix.md,
references/06-build-test.md,
references/07-commit-push.md _(parent)_,
references/08-reply-resolve.md,
references/09-convergence.md (includes
the round-cap recap gate),
references/10-cleanup.md _(parent)_.
GitHub API behavior, dead-ends, and the GraphQL traps for the
reviewer mutation.
templates/reply-fix.md — accepted-fix
pattern; templates/reply-decline.md —
declined-with-rationale pattern;
templates/reply-drift.md —
PR-description / comment / test-plan drift acknowledgement;
templates/reply-partial.md —
partial fix with deferred follow-up. Cross-cutting reply guidance
and anti-patterns live in
references/08-reply-resolve.md.
Invoke-Gh,Invoke-GhGraphQL, Resolve-RepoCoords); dot-sourced by every
script.
trigger Copilot review and verify pickup via the
copilot_work_started event.
single-shot snapshot of the PR's Copilot review state; emits
Converged: true only when all three conditions hold.
every unresolved PR review thread from all reviewers (Copilot,
humans, github-advanced-security, etc.).
post a reply and resolve in one call.
safety net for outdated Copilot threads.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.
Take github/copilot-pr-autopilot from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.
The instructions reference brew.
Without those the skill loads but fails at the first command.