DevTools repository-specific PR review workflow enforcing DevTools style guidelines and common review patterns. Use when reviewing pull requests in the flutter/devtools repository.
npx skills add https://github.com/flutter/devtools --skill reviewing-devtools-prs
Extends reviewing-prs for pull requests in flutter/devtools. Follow reviewing-prs for GitHub CLI data retrieval and the strict user approval workflow.
Read and enforce:
[MUST-FIX], [CONCERN], [NIT], zero-formatting policy, copyright headers, DRY rules, magic values)addAutoDisposeListener(...).Widget classes over helper methods returning Widget (_buildFoo()).CenteredMessage) and test mocks (e.g. mockConnectedApp) instead of re-creating them inline.// TODO(https://github.com/flutter/devtools/issues/<issue_number>): <description>.unawaited(...) or safeUnawaited(...) where appropriate.false with explicit test expectations in feature_flags_test.dart.main().NEXT_RELEASE_NOTES.md):dt / devtools_tool), CI, and refactors are NOT user-facing.dt, or suggest a * <Description>. #<PR_NUMBER> entry via adding-release-notes if a user-facing PR lacks one.Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Take flutter/reviewing-devtools-prs from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.