mcpbeat Sign in

Hunt Spa API Skill for Claude

Discover a single-page-app's hidden backend API from its public JS bundle, then test that API for broken access control / missing authentication. One of the highest-yield web plays in modern recon — SPAs ship their entire backend route map to the browser, and the API behind them is frequently missing the auth middleware the login page implies. Built from an authorized engagement where this play found an unauthenticated financial API that an ASM scan reporting hundreds of "Criticals" completely missed. Use whenever a target serves a JS-heavy SPA (React/Vue/Angular/Next), an "app"/"console"/"dashboard"/"portal" subdomain, or any `*api*` host shows up in recon. Leaked build artifacts (source maps / .env / .git / asset-manifest) are owned by hunt-source-leak; API version-inventory and behavioral diffing by hunt-shadow-api; this skill owns mapping a live SPA's backend routes from its JS bundle and testing them for broken access control / missing auth.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
3280
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter --skill hunt-spa-api

The instruction itself

10 sections, as written by the author

When to use this skill

Trigger when:

  • A target host returns a tiny HTML shell + big /static/js/*.js or /_next/static/* bundles (React/Vue/Angular/Next/Svelte SPA)
  • You see a subdomain named console, app, dashboard, portal, admin, panel, manage, internal
  • Recon surfaces any *api*, *-api*, api.* host
  • A login page is OAuth/SSO-gated (the *frontend* auth tells you nothing about whether the *API* enforces auth)

The core insight: a SPA is a client to a backend API, and it ships the full map of that API — hosts, routes, sometimes keys — to anyone who views source. The login page being protected says nothing about whether the API behind it checks tokens. Auth is frequently enforced on the *gateway/login* and missing on a *route group* of the API.

DO NOT skip this because "the app needs login" — that's exactly when this pays off.


The play (5 steps)

1. Pull the shell + enumerate the bundles

curl -s https://console.target.com/ -o index.html
# React/CRA:
grep -oE '/static/js/[^"]+\.js' index.html
# Next.js:
grep -oE '/_next/static/[^"]+\.js' index.html
# generic:
grep -oiE 'src="[^"]+\.js[^"]*"' index.html

Download every bundle (they can be multi-MB — that's fine, it's all route data):

mkdir bundles
for j in $(grep -oE '/static/js/[^"]+\.js' index.html | sort -u); do
  curl -s "https://console.target.com$j" -o "bundles/$(echo "$j"|tr '/' '_')"
done

2. Harvest API hosts, routes, and secrets from the bundles

B=bundles/*.js
# Backend API hosts (incl. dev/beta/staging variants — often weaker auth)
grep -ohiE 'https://[a-z0-9.-]*(api|console|backend|service)[a-z0-9.-]*\.target\.com[a-z0-9/_-]*' $B | sort -u
# Versioned API base paths
grep -ohiE '/api/v[0-9]+/?' $B | sort -u
# Route literals — minified bundles store routes as STRING segments, not full URLs.
# Grep for quoted "resource/action" strings:
grep -ohiE '"[a-z0-9_-]+/[a-z0-9_/-]+"' $B | tr -d '"' \
  | grep -iE '(login|user|account|order|billing|invoice|payment|deal|report|token|otp|password|reset|admin|profile|auth|upload|export|role|permission|dashboard|wallet|finance|sales)' | sort -u
# Secrets (validate before trusting — most AIza keys are Maps/analytics, not Auth)
grep -ohiE '(AIza[0-9A-Za-z_-]{35}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|sk_live_[0-9A-Za-z]+|eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]{10,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]{10,}|apiKey["'"'"']?\s*[:=]\s*["'"'"'][^"'"'"']+)' $B | sort -u

Note: minifiers store routes as concatenated string segments (e.g. "account/payment/list"), NOT full /api/v2/... URLs — so a naive /api/v* grep returns nothing. Grep for the resource-word route strings and prepend the base yourself.

3. Establish a CONTROL — find an endpoint that IS gated

Before declaring anything vulnerable, send an unauthenticated request to an endpoint you expect to be protected, and capture what *correct* rejection looks like:

curl -s -X POST https://api.target.com/api/users -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}'
# secure → {"error":"Missing or invalid authorization header"} or HTTP 401

This is your differential. A sibling API (e.g. a second API host, or a different route group on the same host) is the ideal control — same stack, so a different response = real authz gap, not a quirk.

4. Test each route family UNAUTHENTICATED, both methods

For every discovered route, send it with no Authorization header and compare to the control:

for r in <routes>; do
  curl -s -o /tmp/r -w "[%{http_code}] $r\n" -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' "https://api.target.com/api/v2/$r"
done

Interpret:

  • 401/"Missing authorization" → gated (correct). Move on.
  • 200 with data → unauthenticated data exposure. Finding.
  • 400 "field X is mandatory" → the route processed your request and reached *business-logic validation* without an auth check → auth bypass; supply the field minimally to confirm.
  • 200 + verbose DB/stack error (e.g. PROCEDURE db_x.sp_y does not exist) → reached the data layer unauthenticated; also a SQLi-surface signal.
  • Mandatory fields named like is_admin / is_internal / requested_by / role_id / account_typeauthorization derived from client-supplied parameters — set the privilege flag and you self-elevate. Critical-class.

5. Pivot & prove (minimally)

  • IDs returned by one endpoint (account_id, order_id, deal_id) are the keys the *other* endpoints consume — they prove the whole router is reachable, not just one route.
  • Test dev-/beta-/staging- API variants — they frequently have weaker/disabled auth.
  • Check the response headers: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * compounds the issue (any web origin reads it from a victim's browser).
  • STOP at minimum-necessary proof. A handful of records (or a totalCount) confirms the missing check. Do NOT enumerate the table — see redteam-mindset data-minimization boundary. The finding is the absent auth, not the data volume.

What "the API behind the SSO login" really means

A common, dangerous architecture:

  • console.target.com (the SPA) → login is Entra/Okta/Google OAuth (looks airtight).
  • api.target.com (the backend) → some route groups enforce the bearer token, some route groups forgot the middleware.

The frontend login is theatre if the API doesn't independently validate the token on every route. Always test the API directly, bare, regardless of how locked-down the login UI is.


Anti-patterns

  • "The app requires login, so the API must be protected." No — test the API directly, unauthenticated. The whole point.
  • "Minified bundle, can't read it." You don't need to read it — grep it for hosts/routes/secrets. 5 minutes.
  • "/api/v1/foo returned 404, so no API here." Wrong base or wrong method. Try /api/, /api/v2/, POST not GET, and the exact route strings from the bundle (Express's 404 echoes the path — use it to calibrate).
  • "AIza key found → critical secret." Validate first — most are Maps/analytics keys (CONFIGURATION_NOT_FOUND on identitytoolkit = not Auth-enabled). Don't over-claim.
  • Dumping the whole dataset once you get a 200. Stop at PoC. (redteam-mindset.)
  • Account-creation / write endpoints as "proof". Read endpoints prove the auth gap without creating state. Never POST a create/signup/upload to "demonstrate" — that's a destructive write needing explicit per-action authorization.

  • hunt-api-misconfig — once the API is mapped, run the broader misconfig matrix (method tampering, mass assignment, JWT alg confusion) per route.
  • hunt-idor — the account_id/order_id pivots feed straight into IDOR testing across discovered routes.
  • hunt-source-leak — sourcemaps (*.js.map) reconstruct original source for deeper route/secret extraction; same harvesting muscle.
  • hunt-nextjs — for Next.js targets, layer the middleware-bypass (x-middleware-subrequest) and /_next/data route tests on top of this.
  • redteam-mindset — the data-minimization boundary governs step 5: prove the missing check, don't exfiltrate the table.
  • recon-scope-triage — verify the API host actually belongs to the target before testing (don't pop a same-named third party's API).

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
MCP Builder
by anthropics
vendor ×13

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

30k tokens scripts
Changelog Generator
by frostant
×9

Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.

774 tokens
Finishing A Development Branch
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

1k tokens
MCP Builder
by JayZeeDesign
×7

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

37k tokens scripts
Vercel React Native Skills
by vercel-labs
vendor ×6

React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.

39k tokens
Vercel React Best Practices
by ratacat
×5

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

34k tokens
Next Best Practices
by vercel-labs
vendor ×4

Next.js best practices - file conventions, RSC boundaries, data patterns, async APIs, metadata, error handling, route handlers, image/font optimization, bundling

20k tokens
Using Git Worktrees
by ZhanlinCui
×4

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

1k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take elementalsouls/hunt-spa-api from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.