dpearson2699/swift-architecture
Selects, reviews, and migrates Apple-platform app architectures across MV with Observation, MVVM, MVI, TCA, Clean Architecture, Coordinator, and legacy VIPER. Use when choosing module and dependency boundaries, escalating a feature beyond simple SwiftUI MV, planning incremental architecture migration, or auditing state ownership and test seams.
npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill swift-architecture
Choose the smallest architecture that makes state ownership, dependencies, side effects, and tests explicit. Default new SwiftUI features to MV; escalate only for observed complexity.
This skill owns pattern selection, module boundaries, dependency direction, migration strategy, and architecture-level test seams. Route SwiftUI property-wrapper wiring and view composition to swiftui-patterns, navigation APIs and route models to swiftui-navigation, isolation diagnostics to swift-concurrency, and test syntax/fixtures to swift-testing.
| Pattern | Choose when | Main cost |
|---|---|---|
| MV | SwiftUI feature has straightforward state and orchestration | Logic can drift into large views without decomposition |
| MVVM | Presentation logic needs an independently testable adapter | Extra layer can become a forwarding shell |
| MVI | A feature is best modeled as explicit state + intents + reducer/effects | Boilerplate and centralized transition design |
| TCA | Many composable features need deterministic effects, dependencies, and testing | Framework learning and architectural commitment |
| Clean Architecture | Large product needs strict dependency direction across domain/data/UI | Protocol and mapping overhead |
| Coordinator | UIKit or hybrid navigation needs a separate flow owner | Another lifecycle and routing owner |
| VIPER | Maintaining an existing UIKit module with established VIPER boundaries | Very high ceremony; poor default for new SwiftUI work |
Use Coordinator alongside another state pattern when navigation complexity is the pressure; it is not a replacement for domain/state architecture.
Keep views as state expressions and put business operations in observable models and injected services:
@MainActor
@Observable
final class TripStore {
private let client: TripClient
var trips: [Trip] = []
var error: Error?
init(client: TripClient) { self.client = client }
func load() async {
do { trips = try await client.fetchTrips() }
catch { self.error = error }
}
}
struct TripList: View {
@State private var store: TripStore
init(client: TripClient) {
_store = State(initialValue: TripStore(client: client))
}
var body: some View {
List(store.trips) { Text($0.name) }
.task { await store.load() }
}
}
Load Architecture Pattern Recipes for MVVM, MVI, TCA, Clean Architecture, Coordinator, and VIPER structure.
Do not escalate merely because a view is long. First extract subviews, services, and focused observable models.
Migrate one feature boundary at a time:
For ObservableObject to Observation, preserve the same owner and mutation isolation before replacing wrappers. For MVVM to MV, delete forwarding view-model members only after views bind to the same model/service behavior. For TCA adoption, wrap one feature's state/actions/effects and migrate dependencies incrementally.
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Pattern chosen by popularity | Tie it to an observed feature pressure. |
| View model only forwards properties | Remove it and use MV. |
| One object owns navigation, networking, formatting, persistence, and UI state | Split by responsibility and dependency direction. |
| TCA or Clean Architecture applied to trivial screens | Start with MV and preserve an escalation seam. |
| Coordinator used as a state architecture | Keep it focused on route/lifecycle ownership. |
| Multiple patterns mixed inside one feature | Define one local state/effect model and migrate at feature boundaries. |
| Big-bang migration | Move one tested vertical slice and rerun the same proof matrix. |
Take dpearson2699/swift-architecture from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.