dpearson2699/app-store-review
Audits App Store submission readiness and rejection risk across current review guidelines, PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy and required-reason APIs, privacy labels, ATT, StoreKit payments, metadata, entitlements, widgets, and Live Activities. Use when preparing a submission, responding to rejection, reconciling privacy evidence, or separating upload blockers from cleanup.
npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill app-store-review
Catch App Store rejection risks before submission. Treat policy, SDK, privacy, entitlement, payment, and metadata checks as current release evidence rather than durable facts.
Start every audit by fetching the current App Review Guidelines, Upcoming Requirements, screenshot specifications, required-reason API documentation, and applicable storefront/entitlement payment rules. Record the checked date and source beside each release blocker. Then archive-build and validate the exact submission, separate blockers from cleanup, fix one class of evidence mismatch, and rerun the same checks against the rebuilt archive.
For prompts about keywords, screenshot captions, product-page metadata, or metadata rejection risk, answer from a compliance angle and explicitly defer keyword research, ranking strategy, conversion optimization, screenshot ordering, and A/B testing to app-store-optimization. Keep App Review metadata guidance limited to accuracy, field limits, misleading-content risk, and screenshot compliance. Load the dated format, screenshot, and toolchain facts from Current Release Requirements.
For full submission readiness audits, separate blocking upload/review issues from ordinary cleanup. Cross-check privacy manifests, App Store privacy nutrition labels, privacy policy, ATT state, runtime network behavior, and SDK behavior against each other; the declarations and observed behavior must align.
Escalate these as blockers before ordinary cleanup:
| Guideline risk | Release evidence |
|---|---|
| 2.1 completeness | No placeholders, broken/empty flows, inaccessible hardware-only features, or login gates without working demo credentials and review notes. |
| 2.3 metadata | App name, category, description, keywords, and screenshots accurately represent the submitted binary and actual UI. |
| 4.2 minimum functionality | The app provides meaningful app-specific value beyond a thin website or trivial duplication of system behavior. |
| 2.5.1 software requirements | Archive uses public APIs and does not download code that changes reviewed functionality outside documented exceptions. |
Verify these against the current guidelines and the exact archive; do not carry version or screenshot requirements forward from an older release checklist.
A privacy manifest is required when your app code, an executable, a dynamic library, or a third-party SDK uses Apple's required-reason API categories or declares collected data/tracking behavior.
See: references/privacy-manifest.md for the full structure, reason codes, and checklists.
Digital goods, features, subscriptions, virtual currency, ad removal, and digital tips generally require IAP unless a current guideline exception, storefront rule, or approved entitlement applies. Physical goods and real-world services use their ordinary payment flow. Before purchase, show price, duration, renewal/trial terms, billing frequency, and cancellation terms; verify product classification, restoration, entitlement verification, deferred/interrupted purchases, and Ask to Buy. Load storekit for implementation and re-check current regional/external-link rules before labeling a path compliant.
Load the full HIG checks for navigation, modals, widgets, system features,
launch screens, and empty states from review-checklists.md.
If your app tracks users across other companies' apps or websites, you must:
ATTrackingManager.requestTrackingAuthorization before any cross-app or cross-website tracking occurs, including tracking-capable SDK behaviorNSUserTrackingUsageDescription explaining what tracking is used forIf you do not track users across apps or websites, do not show the ATT prompt. Apple rejects unnecessary ATT prompts.
import AppTrackingTransparency
@MainActor
func requestTrackingPermission() async {
let status = await ATTrackingManager.requestTrackingAuthorization()
switch status {
case .authorized:
// Enable tracking, initialize ad SDKs with tracking
break
case .denied, .restricted:
// Use non-personalized ads and disable cross-app/cross-website tracking
break
case .notDetermined:
// Should not happen after request, handle gracefully
break
@unknown default:
break
}
}
Timing: Request ATT permission after the app is active and the user has context for why tracking is being requested. Do not show the prompt immediately on first launch or stack it with another system permission prompt.
Alternative distribution, browser-engine, notarization, and external-payment
paths are region- and entitlement-specific. Re-check the current storefront
rules and treat an unsupported route as a blocker.
Every entitlement needs an active feature, a specific usage description when
applicable, and matching archive behavior. Use the table and valid property-list
examples in Entitlements and Usage Descriptions.
xcodebuild -exportArchive. Automated uploads via altool or Transporter also work.Request expedited review only for Apple-documented critical or time-sensitive
cases, using a concise factual justification in App Store Connect's Contact Us
form.
Use Phased Release Schedule
for the rollout percentages and App Store Connect controls.
Keep the name, subtitle, keywords, screenshots, and previews accurate to the
submitted binary and actual UI. Do not use prices, competitor terms, or
misleading claims. Apply field limits and media rules from the
Metadata Compliance Checklist,
and route research, ranking, conversion, screenshot ordering, and A/B testing
to app-store-optimization.
Respond in App Store Connect's Resolution Center with a concise evidence trail:
the submission satisfies each relevant requirement.
credentials, screenshots, or a focused video walkthrough.
through the Resolution Center or App Store Contact form (App Review >
Appeal), including the full submission history and supporting evidence.
The Board's decision is final for that submission; modifying the app and
resubmitting remains available.
Quick-check before every submission (full version in references/review-checklists.md):
Take dpearson2699/app-store-review from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.