Intelligence Collection Disciplines Agent Skill

Intelligence Collection Disciplines

Purpose

Stop doing competitive research like a term paper. The intelligence community solved this problem

decades ago: they don't collect "data," they run collection disciplines — independent channels,

each with its own sources, tradecraft, and blind spots — and then they *fuse* them. This skill gives

product managers that playbook: eight disciplines, each telling you (1) what to collect, (2) where to

collect it, (3) which signal → inference chains to run, and (4) which PM artifact it feeds

(TAM/SAM/SOM, ICPs, personas, battle cards, roadmap bets, win/loss, positioning, pricing). One signal

is an anecdote; three correlated signals from independent disciplines is intelligence.

Input

Works best with the six instantiation variables below — fill them once and every discipline

becomes engagement-specific. Leave them blank and this stays a teaching artifact.

~~~

[TARGET] = The competitor, partner, or acquirer you're researching

[MARKET] = The category and its NAICS/SIC/NACE codes (or nearest equivalent)

[GEOGRAPHY] = Regions in scope, at COUNTRY level, not continent level

[BUYER] = Who signs the check (drives review sites, job titles, conferences)

[CAPABILITY] = The strategic move you suspect (platform play, market entry,

pricing shift, compliance land-grab, etc.)

[DECISION] = What this research will change (roadmap bet, positioning,

pricing, market entry, deal defense, ICP refresh)

~~~

If [DECISION] is blank, stop. Research without a decision is a hobby.

Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an

appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as variables already filled. Use it; don't re-ask.

Arriving empty-handed? That works too. Read the disciplines as a course in tradecraft, or ask the

agent to walk the instantiation block with you one variable at a time.

Example invocation: `Use intelligence-collection-disciplines — [TARGET]: Meridian Freight Systems,

[CAPABILITY]: suspected move into warehouse robotics, [DECISION]: whether we accelerate our own

integration roadmap.`

Key Concepts

The Eight Disciplines

| Discipline | Intel Community Name | Plain English | Primary PM Artifact |

|---|---|---|---|

| 1. OSINT | Open Source Intelligence | Press, social, periodicals, analysts | Battle cards, positioning |

| 2. FININT | Financial Intelligence | Filings, earnings calls, procurement | Battle cards, SOM capture rates |

| 3. GEOINT/DEMOINT | Geospatial & Demographic Intelligence | Census, labor, trade, economic statistics | TAM/SAM/SOM, ICPs, personas |

| 4. TECHINT | Technical Intelligence | Patents, technographics, changelogs | Roadmap bets |

| 5. HUMINT | Human Intelligence | Talent moves, employee chatter, win/loss | Roadmap bets, battle cards |

| 6. SIGINT | Signals Intelligence | Web diffs, pricing changes, job posts | Battle cards, pricing strategy |

| 7. MASINT | Measurement & Signature | Supply chain, ops indicators | Threat assessment |

| 8. All-Source Fusion | n/a | Cross-validation and confidence stacking | Everything above |

• Independence is the design. The disciplines matter because they fail differently: a press

release can lie, but a customs record, a patent filing, and thirty job posts are three separate

bureaucracies that would all have to be lying in the same direction.

• Signal → inference chains are the tradecraft: each observable signal maps to a bounded

interpretation, labeled per the autonomous-investigation protocol (Fact / Inference / Assumption).

• What this is NOT: espionage. Every source below is published, filed, posted, or publicly

observable. See Guardrails in Common Pitfalls.

Application

1. OSINT — The Journalist's Desk

*What a good beat reporter knows before the press release drops.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| [TARGET] press & newsroom | Company newsroom pages, Google Alerts, PR Newswire feeds | Meltwater, Cision |

| Industry periodicals | Trade publications, association newsletters, vertical Substacks for [MARKET] | Analyst subscriptions |

| Analyst coverage | Gartner/Forrester press summaries, free webinar replays | Gartner, Forrester, IDC full reports |

| Social & community | LinkedIn exec posts, Reddit, Hacker News, X | Brandwatch, Sprout listening |

| Review sites | Whichever your [BUYER] reads: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, app stores, Trustpilot | G2 Buyer Intent data |

| Conference footprint | Session titles, sponsor tiers, booth size, speaker rosters at [MARKET] events | n/a |

| Prediction markets | Polymarket, Kalshi, Metaculus, Manifold (crowd-priced odds on regulation, approvals, tech milestones relevant to [MARKET]) | n/a |

Signal → inference chains:

• [TARGET] exec suddenly posting about a new problem space → positioning pivot incoming (execs test messaging on social 3-6 months before launch)
• Sponsor tier jump at a [MARKET] conference → market entry or doubling down
• Review complaints clustering on one feature → their roadmap pressure point = your battle card ammo
• Analyst briefing requests (visible via analyst posts) → category creation attempt
• Webinar topics shifting → what they're teaching the market is what they're about to sell
• Sudden silence on a product line → sunset in progress
• Prediction-market odds moving on a regulation or milestone that gates [MARKET] → crowd-priced expectations for scenario planning; treat as a leading indicator of consensus, not ground truth, and check liquidity before trusting the number

Feeds: battle cards (objection handling from review mining), positioning (their words vs. customer words gap), win/loss context.

2. FININT — The Forensic Accountant

*Follow the money. Companies lie in press releases. They lie less in filings, because lying there is a felony.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| Public filings | SEC EDGAR (US), Companies House (UK), BRIS and European e-Justice company search (EU), national securities regulators for [GEOGRAPHY] | AlphaSense, Sentieo |

| Earnings calls | Company IR pages, Seeking Alpha transcripts | AlphaSense (search across calls) |

| Private company signals | Crunchbase free tier, incorporation records, insolvency registers, beneficial-ownership registers where legally accessible | PitchBook, CB Insights |

| Government spend & procurement | USAspending.gov, SAM.gov (US), TED and national procurement portals (EU), country platforms (MENA), development-bank procurement (World Bank, EBRD, AfDB, UNGM) | GovWin |

| Competition & state-aid cases | European Commission merger/antitrust/state-aid databases; national competition authorities | n/a |

| State & sovereign capital | Sovereign wealth fund reports, state-owned enterprise annual reports, PPP pipelines | n/a |

Signal → inference chains:

• Risk Factors section changes year-over-year in an annual filing → what genuinely scares them (they must disclose it)
• Segment reporting restructure → strategic reprioritization; follow which segment got promoted
• Earnings call Q&A dodges (analysts ask, execs deflect) → soft spot; probe it in your positioning
• New entity registrations or branches in [GEOGRAPHY] → market entry before any announcement
• Deferred revenue trends → actual sales momentum vs. stated momentum
• Merger filings → market definitions and named competitors, straight from [TARGET]'s own lawyers
• Sovereign fund or state-aid money backing [TARGET] → their runway math just changed; discount-pressure plays won't work
• Prior Information Notices and expressions of interest → tenders telegraphed 3-24 months out

Feeds: battle cards (financial stress = "they'll be desperate at quarter-end" plays), SOM capture

rates (their revenue ÷ claimed customer count = deal size reality check, feeding the GEOINT/DEMOINT

sizing recipe), account targeting (procurement award patterns).

3. GEOINT/DEMOINT — The Cartographer

*The terrain map, not troop movement. Government statistics are free intelligence most PMs never open —

and the backbone of every ICP, persona, and TAM that survives scrutiny.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| US market structure | Census Bureau (County Business Patterns, Economic Census, NAICS establishment counts), BEA | IBISWorld, Statista, Grand View Research |

| US labor & buyers | BLS (occupation counts, wages, industry employment), FRED (macro conditions gating budgets) | TalentNeuron |

| EU market structure | Eurostat, PRODCOM manufacturing statistics, national statistical institutes, ECB data | national data resellers |

| EU trade flows | Eurostat COMEXT, Access2Markets, TARIC (tariffs, quotas, rules of origin) | Panjiva, S&P Global |

| MENA regional | GCC-Stat, Arab Development Portal, ESCWA, Arab Monetary Fund, SESRIC | n/a |

| MENA national | GASTAT (Saudi), FCSC (UAE), CAPMAS (Egypt), HCP (Morocco), and peers | n/a |

| Global cross-check | World Bank Data and Enterprise Surveys, IMF country reports, OECD.Stat, UN Comtrade, ITC Trade Map | n/a |

Signal → inference chains:

• Establishment counts by industry code and employee band → the denominator for bottom-up TAM
• Regional industry concentration → where your SOM actually lives, and where field sales should live
• Occupation growth curves for your [BUYER] roles → is the population you sell to growing or shrinking
• Wage trends in buyer roles → willingness-to-pay ceiling shifts; pricing corridor validation
• Firmographic distributions (size bands, legal forms, sectors) → ICP boundaries drawn from data, not vibes
• Buyer-title prevalence by [GEOGRAPHY] → persona localization; the "VP of Product" you message in Boston is a "Head of Digital" in Frankfurt and may not exist in Riyadh
• Trade-flow shifts in product-specific codes → market entry or supply relocation before any announcement

The TAM/SAM/SOM Recipe (this discipline's signature dish):

~~~

TAM: Establishment counts for [MARKET] (Census/NAICS, Eurostat/NACE,

or national equivalent for [GEOGRAPHY])

× employment/spend benchmarks (BLS, Eurostat, trade associations)

(validate against two independent analyst reports; if they disagree by 3x, say so)

SAM: TAM filtered by your actual constraints: [GEOGRAPHY], segment, compliance

requirements, tech prerequisites (see TECHINT technographics),

local-content and vendor-registration eligibility where applicable

SOM: SAM × realistic capture rate derived from [TARGET] public filings via FININT

(their revenue ÷ their claimed customer count = deal size reality check)

~~~

Feeds: TAM/SAM/SOM (the backbone — see tam-sam-som-calculator), ICP definition, personas,

messaging localization, market entry prioritization, pricing corridor validation.

4. TECHINT — The Patent Examiner

*R&D leaves fingerprints 12-18 months before products ship.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| Patents | patents.google.com, USPTO Patent Center, EPO Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope | Clarivate, LexisNexis PatentSight+ |

| Technographics | BuiltWith free lookups, Wappalyzer | HG Insights, BuiltWith Pro, 6sense |

| Product telemetry | Public changelogs, API docs diffs, status pages, GitHub org activity | n/a |

| Standards bodies | Whichever govern [MARKET]: IETF, W3C, ISO committees, CEN/CENELEC/ETSI work programs, industry consortia | n/a |

| Funded research | CORDIS and Horizon Europe project databases, university project repositories | n/a |

| Academic & preprints | arXiv, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, SSRN, the conferences that matter to [MARKET] | Dimensions, Scopus |

| Trademark filings | USPTO TESS, EUIPO, WIPO Global Brand Database | Corsearch |

Signal → inference chains:

• Patent clusters (5+ filings in one classification in 12 months) → committed bet on [CAPABILITY], not exploration
• Inventor names repeating across filings → the actual product team behind the initiative; track their conference talks and LinkedIn
• Trademark filing for a product-sounding name → launch inside 6-12 months (trademarks are cheap; companies file close to launch)
• [TARGET] repeatedly appearing in funded consortia → their long-range bet, 12-48 months of lead time
• Research pilot sites → likely launch customers, named in public deliverables
• [TARGET] chairing a standards committee → they intend to shape the rules of [MARKET], not just play by them
• [TARGET]-affiliated authors publishing preprints → R&D direction 6-24 months before patents; a paper cluster plus a hiring surge in the same specialty is one of the strongest fusion pairs available
• Author affiliations shifting from university to [TARGET] on successive papers → they hired the lab, not just the idea
• API docs adding endpoints for an unreleased capability → beta program running now
• Your prospects' tech stacks (technographics) → your SAM refinement: who *can* actually buy you

Feeds: roadmap bets (where to accelerate vs. concede), SAM refinement, battle cards (feature-gap

countdown clocks), build/buy/partner decisions.

5. HUMINT — The Sports Scout

*Organizations announce strategy through job boards long before press releases. People are the tell.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| Job postings | LinkedIn Jobs, [TARGET] careers pages, Indeed | JobsPikr, TalentNeuron, Revelio Labs |

| Employee sentiment | Glassdoor, Blind, Reddit communities for [MARKET] | n/a |

| Leadership moves | LinkedIn announcements, press | BoardEx, The Org |

| Win/Loss | Your own sales team debriefs, churned-customer interviews | Clozd, DoubleCheck |

| Conference hallway | Your field team's ears at [MARKET] trade shows | n/a |

Signal → inference chains:

• Hiring surge in one specialty (30+ postings in a quarter) → building [CAPABILITY], not a feature
• Regional specialist roles appearing for a [GEOGRAPHY] you haven't seen them in → expansion pre-announcement
• Job posts naming specific technologies → confirmed stack choices → integration roadmap intel
• Senior product/tech leader exits within 6 months of a strategy announcement → the strategy is in trouble
• Your own alumni landing at [TARGET] → assume they know your playbook
• Employee reviews mentioning "pivot," "reorg," "leadership churn" → 2 quarters of internal distraction = your window
• Win/Loss interviews: the only source that tells you *why* deals actually close (everything else is inference)

Feeds: roadmap bets (their build signals), battle cards (org instability plays), win/loss program

(ground truth for everything).

6. SIGINT — The Wiretap You're Allowed to Have

*Companies broadcast constantly through what they change on the public internet. Most competitors never listen.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| Website diffs | Wayback Machine, Visualping free tier | Visualping, Klue, Crayon (auto-monitoring) |

| Pricing pages | Manual snapshots + Wayback | Klue, Crayon, Kompyte |

| SEO/SEM moves | Google "site:" queries, free Semrush lookups | Semrush, Ahrefs, SpyFu |

| App store metadata | Version notes, screenshot changes, keyword shifts | Sensor Tower, data.ai |

| DNS/infrastructure | crt.sh (new SSL certs reveal new subdomains), DNS records | n/a |

| Webinar/event cadence | [TARGET] events pages, registration platforms | n/a |

Signal → inference chains:

• New subdomain SSL cert (e.g., [capability].[target].com) → product launch staging, often weeks ahead
• Pricing page removes a tier → packaging overhaul, usually toward enterprise
• Sudden SEM bidding on *your* brand terms → they consider you the threat now (congratulations)
• Case study page pattern shifts (new vertical or [GEOGRAPHY] appearing) → segment push
• Messaging A/B visible via Wayback diffs → they're unsure of positioning; hit the wound

Feeds: battle cards (the freshest layer — this is what keeps cards from going stale), pricing

strategy, positioning counter-moves.

7. MASINT — The Satellite Photo

*Measure the physical and operational exhaust. Abnormal resource allocation never lies.*

| Source Type | Free | Paid |

|---|---|---|

| Supply chain | Import/export records via ImportYeti (free tier), Eurostat COMEXT and customs codes, UN Comtrade | S&P Global Supply Chain Intelligence, Panjiva, ImportGenius |

| Facilities & projects | Commercial real estate news, local business journals, permits in [GEOGRAPHY]; industrial-zone tenant announcements, environmental permits, EPC contract awards; satellite imagery | CoStar |

| Ops capacity | Support response time sampling, status page incident frequency | n/a |

| Certifications & safety | Whichever gate [MARKET]: ISO, SOC 2, FedRAMP, CE marks; notified-body designations and safety recalls (EU); sector registries | n/a |

Signal → inference chains:

• 20%+ volume change in critical inputs → pre-launch or demand collapse (check which via FININT)
• New supplier geographies or country-of-origin shifts → market entry, tariff hedging, or resilience play
• Compliance certification "in process" listings → 12-36 month runway into a regulated segment, visible to anyone who checks the registry
• Product recalls or repeated safety-alert patterns → quality strain; battle card ammunition with a public citation
• Land allocation, power/water capacity reservations, or engineering-design contracts preceding equipment procurement → facility buildout 6-36 months before any launch announcement
• Support response times stretching + hiring freeze in support roles → cash constraint or overwhelmed by growth (disambiguate via employee sentiment)
• Office consolidations → cost compression; expect pricing aggression to follow

Note: supply chain and facility signals are strongest for hardware and industrial players. The

software equivalent is ops capacity plus infrastructure-scale language in job postings.

Feeds: threat assessment, launch prediction and capacity estimates, battle cards (capacity-stretch

objections: "ask them about their support SLAs lately").

8. All-Source Fusion — The Situation Room

*One signal is an anecdote. Three correlated signals from independent disciplines is intelligence.*

Apply the Confidence Stacking Rule from the autonomous-investigation protocol: 1 discipline =

watch item; 2 = working hypothesis; 3+ = actionable intelligence; conflicting disciplines = someone is

bluffing — dig. And treat announcements as intent until funding, procurement, land, permits, hiring,

or contracts corroborate them: ambition is OSINT; commitment shows up in FININT, MASINT, and HUMINT.

Fusion template — detecting [TARGET]'s [CAPABILITY] play:

| Discipline | Signal (fill in what you found) |

|---|---|

| MASINT | Resource/input anomaly: ____ |

| TECHINT | Patent cluster or repo activity: ____ |

| HUMINT | Hiring pattern: ____ |

| SIGINT | Infrastructure or web change: ____ |

| FININT | Filing language, procurement award, or earnings dodge: ____ |

| GEOINT/DEMOINT | Terrain check: does the market they'd enter actually exist at the size the move implies? ____ |

Fusion verdict: ____ disciplines, one story → confidence level → recommended response.

The fusion cadence:

• Weekly: SIGINT sweep (site diffs, pricing, job posts). 30 minutes.
• Monthly: OSINT + HUMINT digest. Review mining, employee sentiment, conference intel.
• Quarterly: FININT + TECHINT deep pass. Filings, patents, procurement awards.
• Annual + every TAM refresh: GEOINT/DEMOINT pass. Statistics releases lag; sizing rot is slow but real.
• Event-driven: MASINT alerts, material filings, leadership exits. React within 48 hours.

Mapping disciplines to PM artifacts

| Artifact | Primary Disciplines | Refresh Cadence |

|---|---|---|

| TAM/SAM/SOM | GEOINT/DEMOINT + FININT (capture rates) + TECHINT (technographics) | Annual, plus event-driven |

| ICPs & Personas | GEOINT/DEMOINT + HUMINT (win/loss ground truth) | Semi-annual |

| Messaging & localization | GEOINT/DEMOINT + OSINT | Semi-annual |

| Battle cards | SIGINT + OSINT + HUMINT (win/loss) | Weekly SIGINT layer, monthly rebuild |

| Roadmap bets | TECHINT + HUMINT | Quarterly |

| Positioning | OSINT + FININT (earnings language) | Semi-annual |

| Pricing strategy | SIGINT + FININT + GEOINT/DEMOINT (wage/WTP corridors) | Event-driven |

| Threat assessment | All-Source Fusion | Quarterly brief + event-driven |

Regional note

The disciplines do not change across markets; the sources do, and so does the evidentiary burden. Two

lessons that generalize: in rich-disclosure systems (EU), the challenge is finding the right record in

a fragmented landscape — no single portal holds it all. In announcement-heavy markets (MENA), the

challenge is separating national ambition from funded, procured, permitted commitment — and an

announced budget, an approved budget, committed financing, a tender value, and an awarded contract are

five different numbers wearing the same headline. Search in local languages; never assume the English

portal contains every notice.

A copy/paste collection plan — instantiation variables, discipline-selection table, cadence,

and fusion table — lives in template.md.

Examples

Illustrative fusion fill (all names fictional): you suspect [TARGET] = Meridian Freight Systems is

building a warehouse-robotics platform. The sweep finds: +20% specialized component orders in customs

records (MASINT, Fact), 15 new filings in one robotics patent class (TECHINT, Fact), 30+

platform engineers hired in a quarter (HUMINT, Fact), a new robotics.meridianfreight.com SSL

cert (SIGINT, Fact), the CFO dodging an analyst's capex question (FININT, Inference), and

establishment counts confirming the addressable segment supports the investment math

(GEOINT/DEMOINT, Fact). Six disciplines, one story: high-confidence platform threat. Response:

accelerate your own platform roadmap and arm sales with a maturity battle card *before* their launch,

not after.

Single-discipline quick win: your battle card claims a competitor is "financially strong." One

FININT pass finds deferred revenue declining three quarters straight while claimed customer count grew

— Inference: deal sizes are shrinking. The card gains a quarter-end discount-pressure play, with

the filing URL attached.

See examples/sample.md for a complete worked collection plan (fictional) —

four disciplines chosen and three consciously skipped, a fusion table that escalates to

actionable, and a June signal that correctly *stayed* a watch item until other channels corroborated.

examples/sample-industrial.md is the plan where MASINT stars —

customs, registries, permits — and an absence enters the fusion table as a Fact.

Common Pitfalls

• Feature-matching theater. The goal is never "they shipped X so we ship X." Signals inform

decisions about *outcomes* — "this changes which customer problem wins the next investment."

• Single-discipline conviction. A hiring surge alone is a watch item, not a strategy brief.

Escalate confidence only as independent disciplines corroborate — that's the stacking rule.

• Announcement inflation. Re-planning your roadmap around a press release. Ambition is OSINT;

wait for the money, the permits, or the hires.

• Unsourced claims. A battle card assertion without a source and date is an opinion wearing a

badge. Document provenance on every claim; archive source documents at collection time, because

portals restructure and files get replaced.

• Crossing the line. Pretexting, soliciting NDA-protected information, hiring someone specifically

to extract their former employer's secrets, scraping against terms you agreed to — all off-limits.

Everything in this skill is published, filed, posted, or publicly observable. The stage test: if

you'd be uncomfortable explaining your method at [TARGET]'s user conference, don't use it.

• Running every discipline on every question. The artifact-mapping table exists so you run the two

or three disciplines that feed your [DECISION], on the cadence that matches how fast that evidence

actually changes.

References

• autonomous-investigation (Workflow) — the protocol that

labels and stacks what these disciplines collect

• tam-sam-som-calculator (Component) — consumes the

GEOINT/DEMOINT sizing recipe

• company-research and company-intel

— single-company deep dives built largely on OSINT + FININT + HUMINT

• Investigation skills that run these disciplines: market-landscape-scan,

competitive-research-snapshot, competitive-intel-watch, battle-card-builder

• SCIP Code of Ethics — the competitive-intelligence profession's reference standard
• Regional Source Overlays (EU/MENA companion; planned as a future component skill)
• Adapted from Dean Peters' "Competitive Research on Steroids" compendium and the Competitive Analysis

Playbook (Productside).