Auto-fix issues found by code review in REVIEW.md. Spawns fixer agent, commits each fix atomically, produces REVIEW-FIX.md summary.
npx skills add https://github.com/davepoon/buildwithclaude --skill gsd:code-review-fix
<objective>
Auto-fix issues found by code review. Reads REVIEW.md from the specified phase, spawns gsd-code-fixer agent to apply fixes, and produces REVIEW-FIX.md summary.
Arguments:
--all (optional) — include Info findings in fix scope (default: Critical + Warning only)--auto (optional) — enable fix + re-review iteration loop, capped at 3 iterationsOutput: {padded_phase}-REVIEW-FIX.md in phase directory + inline summary of fixes applied
</objective>
<execution_context>
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/code-review-fix.md
</execution_context>
<context>
Phase: $ARGUMENTS (first positional argument is phase number)
Optional flags parsed from $ARGUMENTS:
--all — Include Info findings in fix scope. Default behavior fixes Critical + Warning only.--auto — Enable fix + re-review iteration loop. After applying fixes, re-run code-review at same depth. If new issues found, iterate. Cap at 3 iterations total. Without this flag, single fix pass only.Context files (CLAUDE.md, REVIEW.md, phase state) are resolved inside the workflow via gsd-sdk query init.phase-op and delegated to agent via config blocks.
</context>
<process>
This command is a thin dispatch layer. It parses arguments and delegates to the workflow.
Execute the code-review-fix workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/code-review-fix.md end-to-end.
The workflow (not this command) enforces these gates:
</process>
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Take davepoon/gsd:code-review-fix from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.