mcpbeat

Output Contract Enforcer

curiositech/output-contract-enforcer

Validates that a DAG node's output matches its declared JSON schema before passing to downstream nodes. The glue that makes multi-agent DAGs reliable. Use when checking output contract compliance, generating validation schemas from descriptions, or debugging contract mismatches between nodes. Activate on "validate output", "output contract", "schema validation", "contract mismatch", "output doesn't match". NOT for content quality assessment (use dag-quality), skill grading (use skill-grader), or general JSON schema work outside DAG context.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
177
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill output-contract-enforcer

The instruction itself

11 sections, as written by the author

Output Contract Enforcer

Validates that a DAG node's output matches its declared JSON schema before passing to downstream nodes. The glue that makes multi-agent DAGs reliable. Without this, downstream nodes receive unpredictable input and the DAG breaks.


When to Use

Use for:

  • Validating a node's output against its declared schema
  • Generating output schemas from natural-language output descriptions
  • Debugging why a downstream node rejected its input
  • Ensuring contract compatibility between connected nodes

NOT for:

  • Assessing content quality or correctness (use dag-quality)
  • Grading skill quality (use skill-grader)
  • General JSON schema work outside DAG context

Validation Process

flowchart TD
  O[Node output] --> P[Parse as JSON]
  P -->|Parse error| E1[FAIL: Not valid JSON]
  P -->|Valid JSON| S[Check against schema]
  S --> R{Required fields?}
  R -->|Missing| E2[FAIL: Missing required field X]
  R -->|Present| T{Type check?}
  T -->|Wrong type| E3[FAIL: Field X expected string, got number]
  T -->|Correct| C{Constraints?}
  C -->|Violated| E4[FAIL: Field X violates constraint Y]
  C -->|Met| V[PASS: Contract satisfied]

What Gets Checked

| Check | Example | Failure Message |

|-------|---------|----------------|

| JSON parseable | {broken json | "Output is not valid JSON" |

| Required fields | status missing | "Missing required field: status" |

| Field types | status: 42 (expected string) | "Field 'status' expected string, got number" |

| Enum values | status: "maybe" | "Field 'status' must be one of: pass, warn, fail" |

| String constraints | summary: "" (minLength: 1) | "Field 'summary' must have minLength 1" |

| Number constraints | score: 1.5 (maximum: 1.0) | "Field 'score' must be ≤ 1.0" |

| Array constraints | items: [] (minItems: 1) | "Field 'items' must have at least 1 item" |

| Nested objects | Missing sub-field | "Field 'metadata.cost' is required" |

The Standard Output Contract

Every DAG node should produce output matching this base schema (fields can be extended):

{
  "type": "object",
  "required": ["status", "summary"],
  "properties": {
    "status": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": ["pass", "warn", "fail"]
    },
    "summary": {
      "type": "string",
      "minLength": 1,
      "description": "1-3 sentence description of what was produced"
    },
    "artifacts": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": { "type": "string" },
      "description": "List of files created or modified"
    },
    "data": {
      "type": "object",
      "description": "Node-specific output data (schema varies per node)"
    },
    "risks": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": { "type": "string" },
      "description": "Remaining risks or assumptions"
    }
  }
}

Contract Compatibility Check

When connecting Node A's output to Node B's input, verify:

  • Every field B requires is present in A's output schema
  • Types match (A produces string, B expects string)
  • A's output constraints are compatible with B's input constraints
  • If A produces optional fields that B requires → incompatible
Node A output: { status: string, recommendations: string[] }
Node B input:  { status: string, recommendations: string[], priority: number }

Result: INCOMPATIBLE — Node B requires 'priority' but Node A doesn't produce it.
Fix: Add 'priority' to Node A's output, or add a transformer node between A and B.

Schema Generation

When a node description says "produces a list of recommendations with priorities," generate:

{
  "type": "object",
  "required": ["status", "summary", "data"],
  "properties": {
    "status": { "type": "string", "enum": ["pass", "warn", "fail"] },
    "summary": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 },
    "data": {
      "type": "object",
      "required": ["recommendations"],
      "properties": {
        "recommendations": {
          "type": "array",
          "minItems": 1,
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "required": ["text", "priority"],
            "properties": {
              "text": { "type": "string" },
              "priority": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1, "maximum": 5 }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Anti-Patterns

No Contract at All

Wrong: Nodes produce free-form text with no schema.

Why: Downstream nodes can't reliably parse the input. The DAG is fragile.

Right: Every node declares its output schema. Every output is validated before passing downstream.

Overly Strict Contracts

Wrong: Requiring exact character counts, specific formatting, or field values that depend on runtime context.

Right: Constrain structure (types, required fields), not content. Let dag-quality handle content assessment.

Ignoring Optional Fields

Wrong: Treating all fields as required.

Right: Use required only for fields that downstream nodes absolutely need. Mark everything else as optional.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take curiositech/output-contract-enforcer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.