mcpbeat Sign in

Dev Review Agent Skill

AI DevKit · Final code review phase guidance for holistic pre-push review. Use when the user wants code review, final lifecycle review, design alignment checks, integration risk review, or dev-lifecycle phase 9.

787 tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
2
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
1571
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit --skill dev-review

The instruction itself

3 sections, as written by the author

Dev Review

Run final pre-push review for configured AI docs features. Before changing docs or code, propose the concrete review plan and wait for user approval unless the user already approved the exact phase plan.

Phase Contract

  • Run npx ai-devkit@latest lint before phase work.
  • If working on a named feature, run npx ai-devkit@latest lint --feature <name>.
  • Check git status -sb and git diff --stat.
  • Read feature docs and relevant changed files before findings.
  • Apply the verify skill before claiming readiness.
  • If parent dev-lifecycle established usable task tracing, emit review phase, progress, blocker/finding, next-step, and final evidence/readiness events per task.

Code Review

Use for Phase 9. Take a holistic review stance: findings first, ordered by severity, grounded in file/line references.

  • Gather context: feature description, modified files, design docs, risky areas, tests already run.
  • Verify design alignment by summarizing architectural intent and checking implementation matches.
  • For each modified file, grep exported names to trace callers and dependents. Read relevant signatures, call sites, and type definitions.
  • Check consistency against 1-2 similar modules.
  • Search for existing utilities the new code could reuse or now duplicates. Flag near-matches honestly; do not force a wrong abstraction.
  • Verify contract integrity at API, type, config, and schema boundaries.
  • Check dependency health, including circular dependencies or version conflicts from new imports.
  • Check breaking changes. For public/external APIs, recommend parallel change and deprecation over in-place mutation. For in-repo-only callers, in-place modification with all callers updated is acceptable.
  • Check rollback safety, especially irreversible migrations or one-way data/state changes.

10. Review file by file for correctness, logic, edge cases, redundancy, security, performance, error handling, and test coverage.

11. Check cross-cutting concerns: naming conventions, documentation updates, missing tests, config/migration changes.

12. Summarize blocking issues, important follow-ups, and nice-to-haves. Per finding include file, issue, impact severity, and recommendation.

13. If task tracing is available, add blockers and set blocked for blocking findings; if review passes with final evidence, close the task per task.

14. Complete final checklist: design match, no logic gaps, security addressed, integration points verified, tests cover changes, docs updated.

Done: if the checklist passes, the feature is ready to push and create a PR. If blocking issues remain, return to dev-implementation or dev-testing.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Receiving Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

2k tokens
Requesting Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×6

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

2k tokens
Git Commit
by github
vendor ×3

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

799 tokens
Github Code Review
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

13k tokens
Karpathy Guidelines
by hyyhf
×3

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

629 tokens
Code Reviewer
by google-gemini
vendor ×2

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

795 tokens
Agent MD Refactor
by softaworks
×2

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

4k tokens
Commit Work
by softaworks
×2

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

2k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take codeaholicguy/dev-review from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.

Install what it needs

The instructions reference npx. Without those the skill loads but fails at the first command.