mcpbeat Sign in

Lcx Contribute Bug Fix Skill for Codex

Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a generated distribution mirror). Use when the user asks to fix a bug, contribute a bug fix, contribute to fix bug, open a PR for a bug, or debug and PR a LazyCodex/Codex defect.

2.8k tokens
context cost
SKILL.md, read when the skill is used
3
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
67 138
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent --skill lcx-contribute-bug-fix

What comes with it

3 532 bytes besides the instruction
agents/openai.yaml
scripts/create-pr-body.mjs

The instruction itself

7 sections, as written by the author

lcx-contribute-bug-fix

Use this skill to debug a concrete LazyCodex or Codex defect, implement the smallest correct fix in a fresh temporary workspace, and deliver it. Work in English, keep the body short, and support every claim with runtime or source evidence.

Route ownership the same way as $lcx-report-bug, but the deliverable differs by target:

  • code-yeongyu/lazycodex for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled skills, hooks, MCP wiring, installer behavior, marketplace sync, docs, or packaging. Deliverable: a verified-fix issue with the patch embedded. NEVER open a PR or push a branch against this repo — its contents are regenerated from the source tree on every release, so PRs there cannot be merged and will be closed.
  • openai/codex for upstream Codex CLI bugs that reproduce without LazyCodex or come from Codex core behavior. Deliverable: a PR from a fork.

Required Outcome

For openai/codex, create a fork PR that includes:

  • a focused branch from a fresh ${TMPDIR:-/tmp} clone/worktree
  • reproduction logs from before the fix
  • the smallest implementation that fixes the defect
  • verification logs from after the fix
  • apply lazycodex-generated when label management is available
  • the required LazyCodex footer tag Tag: lazycodex-generated
  • cleanup of temporary worktrees and clones

For code-yeongyu/lazycodex, create an issue (never a PR) that includes:

  • reproduction logs from before the fix
  • the root cause with source evidence
  • the verified patch as a unified diff, produced and tested in a fresh ${TMPDIR:-/tmp} clone/worktree
  • verification logs from after the fix
  • the lazycodex-generated label and the footer tag Tag: lazycodex-generated
  • cleanup of temporary worktrees and clones

Required Workflow

  • Read the user's bug report and identify the affected surface.
  • Invoke $omo:debugging for the investigation. If only unqualified skill names are exposed, invoke $debugging and state that it is the OMO debugging skill.
  • Materialize the latest sources under LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}", then decide the target repository. Sync both checkouts on every run and compare them before choosing. Validate cached checkouts before reuse so an incomplete .git directory cannot route the fix to the wrong repo:
LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}"
mkdir -p "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT"

valid_source_checkout() {
  DEST="$1"
  git -C "$DEST" rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
    git -C "$DEST" config --get remote.origin.url >/dev/null 2>&1
}

recover_corrupt_source_checkout() {
  DEST="$1"
  if [ -e "$DEST" ] && ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
    QUARANTINED="$DEST.corrupt.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
    mv "$DEST" "$QUARANTINED"
    echo "Moved corrupt source cache $DEST to $QUARANTINED" >&2
  fi
}

sync_latest_source() {
  REPO="$1"; DEST="$2"
  recover_corrupt_source_checkout "$DEST"
  if [ ! -d "$DEST" ]; then
    gh repo clone "$REPO" "$DEST" -- --depth=1 \
      || git clone --depth=1 "https://github.com/$REPO" "$DEST"
  fi
  if ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
    echo "Source cache $DEST is not a usable git checkout after clone" >&2
    return 1
  fi
  git -C "$DEST" remote set-url origin "https://github.com/$REPO.git" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
  DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" remote show origin | sed -n '/HEAD branch/s/.*: //p')"
  if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
    DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's#^origin/##')"
  fi
  if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
    echo "Could not determine default branch for $REPO in $DEST" >&2
    return 1
  fi
  git -C "$DEST" fetch --depth=1 origin "$DEFAULT_BRANCH"
  git -C "$DEST" checkout -B "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" FETCH_HEAD
}
sync_latest_source code-yeongyu/lazycodex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source"
sync_latest_source openai/codex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/openai-codex-source"
  • Create a fresh temporary clone and branch under ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}. Do not modify the user's current repository for the target fix unless the current repository is itself the requested target and the user explicitly asked for local edits.
TARGET_REPO="code-yeongyu/lazycodex" # or openai/codex
WORK_ROOT="$(mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-XXXXXX")"
gh repo clone "$TARGET_REPO" "$WORK_ROOT/repo" -- --depth=1
cd "$WORK_ROOT/repo"
BASE_BRANCH="$(git remote show origin | sed -n '/HEAD branch/s/.*: //p')"
git fetch origin "$BASE_BRANCH" --depth=1
BRANCH_NAME="lazycodex/bug-fix-<short-slug>"
git worktree add "$WORK_ROOT/worktree" -b "$BRANCH_NAME" "origin/$BASE_BRANCH"
cd "$WORK_ROOT/worktree"

If gh cannot clone, use git clone --depth=1 "https://github.com/$TARGET_REPO" "$WORK_ROOT/repo" and continue with the same worktree flow.

  • Reproduce the bug in the worktree through the real surface. Save exact command output to ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-<short-slug>-repro.log.
  • Write or update a failing regression test before production changes. Confirm it fails for the bug, not for a missing fixture or typo.
  • Implement the smallest correct fix. Avoid refactors unless the fix cannot be made safely without one.
  • Run the regression test, adjacent tests, and the smallest real-surface QA command that proves the user-visible behavior changed.
  • Commit the verified fix in the worktree. Inspect the status first so the delivered diff cannot be empty or stale:
git status --short
git add -A
git commit -m "fix: <short bug-fix summary>"
git log --oneline "origin/$BASE_BRANCH..HEAD"

10. Build the delivery body for the target:

  • openai/codex: generate the PR body with scripts/create-pr-body.mjs.
  • code-yeongyu/lazycodex: export the verified patch and write the issue body from the Verified-Fix Issue Template below:
PATCH_FILE="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-<short-slug>.patch"
git diff "origin/$BASE_BRANCH"..HEAD > "$PATCH_FILE"

11. Ensure the generated label exists when the target repo allows label management. Keep the footer tag even when label creation is unavailable:

LABEL_ARGS=()
if gh label create lazycodex-generated --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --color "7C3AED" --description "Created by LazyCodex" --force; then
  LABEL_ARGS=(--label lazycodex-generated)
else
  echo "Label management unavailable for $TARGET_REPO; keeping the footer tag only."
fi

12. Deliver the fix.

  • code-yeongyu/lazycodex: create the verified-fix issue. Never push a branch to this repo and never run gh pr create against it:
ISSUE_BODY="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-<short-slug>-issue.md"
gh issue create --repo code-yeongyu/lazycodex --title "<short fix title>" "${LABEL_ARGS[@]}" --body-file "$ISSUE_BODY"
  • openai/codex: fork, push the branch to the fork, and create the PR:
gh repo fork openai/codex --remote --remote-name fork
GH_USER="$(gh api user --jq .login)"
git push -u fork "$BRANCH_NAME"
gh pr create --repo openai/codex --base "$BASE_BRANCH" --head "$GH_USER:$BRANCH_NAME" --title "<short fix title>" "${LABEL_ARGS[@]}" --body-file "$PR_BODY"

13. Clean up:

cd /
git -C "$WORK_ROOT/repo" worktree remove "$WORK_ROOT/worktree"
find "$WORK_ROOT" -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -exec rm -r -- {} +
rmdir "$WORK_ROOT"

Return the PR or issue URL, the reproduction command, the verification command, and the cleanup receipt.

Verified-Fix Issue Template (code-yeongyu/lazycodex)

Write the issue body in English. Embed the patch verbatim so a maintainer can apply it to the source tree:

## Problem Situation
[What failed for the user.]

## Reproduction Logs
[Exact failing command and relevant log excerpt.]

## Root Cause
[Confirmed cause with runtime and source evidence.]

## Verified Fix
[What changed and why this is the smallest correct fix.]

[Contents of $PATCH_FILE.]


## Verification
- [RED test output or repro before the fix]
- [GREEN test output after the fix]
- [Manual QA command and result]

---
This fix was debugged, implemented, and verified with [LazyCodex](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/lazycodex).
Tag: lazycodex-generated

PR Body Generator (openai/codex)

Use the bundled script to generate the PR body. Create a JSON file with this shape:

{
  "title": "Fix short user-visible failure",
  "targetRepository": "openai/codex",
  "problem": "What is broken for the user.",
  "reproductionLogs": "Exact failing command, log excerpt, or trace.",
  "approach": "What changed and why this is the smallest correct fix.",
  "confidence": "Why the diagnosis and fix are strongly supported.",
  "risks": "Risk level and what could regress.",
  "userVisibleBehaviorChanges": "What changes for the user after the PR.",
  "verification": ["failing test before fix", "passing test after fix", "manual QA command"]
}

Run:

PR_INPUT="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-<short-slug>-pr.json"
PR_BODY="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-<short-slug>-pr.md"
node "<skill-root>/scripts/create-pr-body.mjs" "$PR_INPUT" "$PR_BODY"

PR Body Template (openai/codex)

The generated body must follow this structure:

## Problem Situation
[What failed for the user.]

## Reproduction Logs
[Exact failing command and relevant log excerpt.]

## Approach
[What changed and why.]

## Why I Am Confident
[Evidence that proves the root cause and fix.]

## Risks
[Risk level and possible regressions.]

## User-Visible Behavior Changes
[What users experience after this PR.]

## Verification
- [RED test output or repro before the fix]
- [GREEN test output after the fix]
- [Manual QA command and result]

---
This PR was debugged, implemented, and created with [LazyCodex](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/lazycodex).
Tag: lazycodex-generated

Stop Conditions

Stop and ask one narrow question only when:

  • the bug cannot be reproduced from available information
  • target repository ownership remains ambiguous after comparing LazyCodex and upstream Codex evidence
  • authentication is missing for creating the issue or pushing and creating the PR
  • the fix requires a product decision rather than a technical correction

Do not open:

  • a PR or pushed branch targeting code-yeongyu/lazycodex — deliver the verified-fix issue instead, always
  • a PR or verified-fix issue without a failing-before and passing-after test
  • a PR or verified-fix issue without a real-surface QA command
  • a PR or issue without the Tag: lazycodex-generated footer
  • a verified-fix issue without the patch embedded in a diff block
  • a vague fix that does not identify the root cause
  • a broad refactor disguised as a bug fix

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
MCP Builder
by anthropics
vendor ×16

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

2.3k tokens scripts
Finishing A Development Branch
by ZhanlinCui
×9

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

1.1k tokens
Changelog Generator
by frostant
×9

Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.

774 tokens
MCP Builder
by JayZeeDesign
×7

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

3.4k tokens scripts
Vercel React Best Practices
by ratacat
×7

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

1.3k tokens
Vercel React Native Skills
by vercel-labs
vendor ×6

React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.

1.1k tokens
Using Git Worktrees
by ZhanlinCui
×6

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

1.4k tokens
Next Best Practices
by vercel-labs
vendor ×4

Next.js best practices - file conventions, RSC boundaries, data patterns, async APIs, metadata, error handling, route handlers, image/font optimization, bundling

1k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take code-yeongyu/lcx-contribute-bug-fix from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.