Implement, review, or improve SwiftUI features using the iOS 26+ Liquid Glass API. Use when asked to adopt Liquid Glass in new SwiftUI UI, refactor an existing feature to Liquid Glass, or review Liquid Glass usage for correctness, performance, and design alignment.
npx skills add https://github.com/coco-research/coco --skill swiftui-liquid-glass
Use this skill to build or review SwiftUI features that fully align with the iOS 26+ Liquid Glass API. Prioritize native APIs (glassEffect, GlassEffectContainer, glass button styles) and Apple design guidance. Keep usage consistent, interactive where needed, and performance aware.
Choose the path that matches the request:
GlassEffectContainer where multiple glass elements appear.GlassEffectContainer when multiple glass elements coexist..glassEffect(...) after layout and visual modifiers..interactive() for elements that respond to touch/pointer.#available(iOS 26, *) and provide a non-glass fallback.#available(iOS 26, *) present with fallback UI.GlassEffectContainer.glassEffect applied after layout/appearance modifiers.interactive() only where user interaction exists.glassEffectID used with @Namespace for morphing.GlassEffectContainer and tune spacing..glassEffect(.regular.tint(...).interactive(), in: .rect(cornerRadius: ...)) as needed..buttonStyle(.glass) / .buttonStyle(.glassProminent) for actions.glassEffectID when hierarchy changes.Use these patterns directly and tailor shapes/tints/spacing.
if #available(iOS 26, *) {
Text("Hello")
.padding()
.glassEffect(.regular.interactive(), in: .rect(cornerRadius: 16))
} else {
Text("Hello")
.padding()
.background(.ultraThinMaterial, in: RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 16))
}
GlassEffectContainer(spacing: 24) {
HStack(spacing: 24) {
Image(systemName: "scribble.variable")
.frame(width: 72, height: 72)
.font(.system(size: 32))
.glassEffect()
Image(systemName: "eraser.fill")
.frame(width: 72, height: 72)
.font(.system(size: 32))
.glassEffect()
}
}
Button("Confirm") { }
.buttonStyle(.glassProminent)
references/liquid-glass.mdUse when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Take coco-research/swiftui-liquid-glass from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.