coco-research/m0-handoff
Session handoff and resume for M0. Write a compact_checkpoint before a session ends or context is compacted, and resume from the latest one at the start of a session in any tool. Turns a cold start into a continuation. Triggers on: 'm0 handoff', 'hand off', 'session handoff', 'save session state', 'resume where we left off', 'pick up where we left off', 'before I compact', 'end of session', 'continue in Cursor', 'continue in Claude Code'.
npx skills add https://github.com/coco-research/coco --skill m0-handoff
Two halves of one flow, both against the M0 operational thread:
compact_checkpoint that a session with no other contextcould act on.
This is what M0 exists for. Everything else in the bundle supports it.
M0="${M0_BASE_URL:-http://127.0.0.1:8787}"
M0S="$HOME/.claude/skills/m0/scripts"
PROJECT="${M0_PROJECT:-$(basename "$PWD")}"
# Hand off
curl -s -X POST "$M0/api/brain/checkpoint" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d "$(python3 - <<'PY'
import json, os, subprocess
def git(*a):
try: return subprocess.check_output(("git",)+a, text=True, stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL).strip()
except Exception: return None
print(json.dumps({
"project": os.environ.get("M0_PROJECT") or os.path.basename(os.getcwd()),
"kind": "compact_checkpoint",
"source_tool": "claude-code",
"branch": git("rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"),
"head_sha": git("rev-parse", "--short", "HEAD"),
"text": "<what state the work is in>",
"next_step": "<the single next action>",
"last_verified": "<command and its actual result>",
"meta_json": {"open_questions": ["<anything unresolved>"]},
}))
PY
)"
# Resume
curl -s "$M0/api/brain/thread?project=$PROJECT&kind=compact_checkpoint&limit=1" | python3 -m json.tool
Serverless equivalents, same store:
python3 "$M0S/m0_server.py" write --project "$PROJECT" --kind compact_checkpoint \
--text "…" --next-step "…" --last-verified "…" \
--branch "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null)" \
--head-sha "$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null)"
python3 "$M0S/m0_server.py" read --project "$PROJECT" --kind compact_checkpoint --limit 1
Write one before the context window is compacted, before a session ends, and
before switching tools. Do not wait to be asked.
$M0_PROJECT, else the repository or directory name.The same value the earlier entries used; check with /m0-recall if unsure.
| Field | What belongs there |
|-------|--------------------|
| text | Where the work stands. What is done, what is half-done, what is broken. Prose, no jargon from this conversation. |
| next_step | The single next action, concrete enough to start on. One action, not a plan. |
| last_verified | The command that was run and what it actually printed. Empty if nothing was verified. |
| meta_json | Anything structured worth keeping: {"open_questions": [...], "files": [...], "pr": 42}. |
branch and head_sha. Without them a reader cannot tell whetherthe checkpoint describes the tree in front of them.
source_tool to the tool you are running in, so the next reader knowswhere the work happened.
deferred: true means the store was busy and the entryis spooled to a sidecar file: real, readable, and landing on the next drain, but
say so rather than reporting a clean write.
{
"kind": "compact_checkpoint",
"text": "Auth middleware refactor is done and green. The admin router still uses the old wrapper, so admin requests bypass the new nonce check.",
"next_step": "Replace the old wrapper in routers/admin.py with require_session, then re-run tests/admin.",
"last_verified": "pytest tests/auth tests/api -q: 214 passed, 0 failed",
"branch": "feat/auth",
"head_sha": "9f2c1ab",
"meta_json": {"open_questions": ["Should legacy tokens keep working past the cutover?"]}
}
The failure mode to avoid is a checkpoint that only makes sense to the session
that wrote it: "continued the refactor, tests mostly fine, next step as
discussed". Assume the reader has nothing but this row.
kind=compact_checkpoint,limit=1). If there is none, fall back to the full thread via /m0-recall.
earlier moment:
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD; git rev-parse --short HEAD; git status --short
Same branch and sha means the description probably still holds. Different, or a
dirty tree, means the world moved — read the newer entries too, and re-run
whatever last_verified claims if you are about to build on it.
was last verified, what the recorded next step is. Then say what you will do.
fits the tree, say so and propose the alternative rather than following it
mechanically.
/m0-remember, so the thread does notgo quiet again until the following handoff.
The thread is one local store, keyed by project, with source_tool on every row.
So "finish this in the other editor" is just: hand off here, resume there.
M0_PROJECT in each tool'senvironment is the reliable way; a mismatch produces two threads that each look
empty.
source_tool honestly in both, so a reader can tell which tool made aclaim.
A session-end hook makes a handoff unconditional rather than remembered — see
/m0 hooks for the recipe. It writes a session_end entry with the branch and
sha even if the agent forgot to write a checkpoint, and because a shutdown hook
runs at a bad moment, this is precisely the case the deferred-write path was built
for: a locked store spools the entry instead of dropping it.
A hook cannot know what the work state was, only that the session ended. It is a
floor, not a substitute for an explicit compact_checkpoint.
Take coco-research/m0-handoff from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.