Gh Pr Review Agent Skill

<!-- Based on https://github.com/Tencent/tgfx/tree/main/.codebuddy/skills/cr -->

<!-- Adapted for agent runtimes and the Cherry Studio tech stack -->

/gh-pr-review — Code Review

Automated code review for local branches, PRs, commits, and files. Detects

review mode from arguments and routes to the appropriate review flow — either

quick single-agent review with interactive fix selection, or multi-agent

deep review with risk-based auto-fix.

Cherry Studio-specific review rules live in

references/cherry-review-guidance.md. Target review flows must load that file

for code, mixed, architecture-doc, and project-skill reviews so reviewers can

apply DataApi, service-boundary, renderer hook, React, UI, and type-contract

checks without relying on memory. That reference also defines which internal

docs, internal skills, external skills, and official websites to consult for

each changed area; load only the relevant subset.

All user-facing text matches the user's language. Use the runtime's interactive

dialog tool for questions and option selection when one is available; otherwise

ask one concise plain-text question and wait for the reply. Do not invent a tool

or syntax the runtime does not expose. For interactive multi-select: ≤4 items →

one question. >4 items → group by priority or category (each group ≤4 options),

then present all groups in one prompt.

Route

Run pre-checks, then match the first applicable rule top-to-bottom:

• git branch --show-current → record whether on main/master.
• git status --porcelain → record whether uncommitted changes exist.
• Check whether the current environment supports parallel subagents (agent

teams), using the runtime-provided coordination tools.

| # | Condition | Action |

|---|-----------|--------|

| 1 | $ARGUMENTS is diag | → references/diagnosis.md |

| 2 | $ARGUMENTS is a PR number or URL containing /pull/ | → references/pr-review.md |

| 3 | Agent teams NOT supported | → references/local-review.md |

| 4 | Uncommitted changes exist | → references/local-review.md |

| 5 | On main/master branch | → references/local-review.md |

| 6 | Everything else | → Question below |

Each → means: Read the target file and follow it as the sole remaining

instruction. Ignore all sections below. Do NOT review from memory or habit —

each target file defines specific constraints on how to obtain diffs, apply

fixes, and submit results.

> Priority rule: user intent (Rule 1, 2, 6) takes priority over working-tree

> state (Rule 3, 4, 5). A PR URL or PR number always goes to

> references/pr-review.md even when the working tree is dirty or the

> current branch is main/master — those state conditions only apply when

> the user did not specify a review target.

Question

Ask a single question:

"Agent Teams is available (multiple agents working in parallel). Enable multi-agent review with reviewer–verifier adversarial mechanism and auto-fix?"

Provide 4 options:

| Option | Description |

|--------|-------------|

| Teams + auto-fix low & medium risk (recommended) | Multi-agent review; auto-fix most issues, only confirm high-risk ones (e.g., API changes, architecture). |

| Teams + auto-fix low risk | Multi-agent review; auto-fix only the safest issues (e.g., null checks, typos, naming). Confirm everything else. |

| Teams + auto-fix all | Multi-agent review; auto-fix everything. Only issues affecting test baselines are deferred. |

| Single-agent + manual fix | Single-agent review; interactively choose which issues to fix afterward. |

Hand off

| Option | → | FIX_MODE |

|--------|---|----------|

| Teams + auto-fix low & medium risk (recommended) | references/teams-review.md | low_medium |

| Teams + auto-fix low risk | references/teams-review.md | low |

| Teams + auto-fix all | references/teams-review.md | full |

| Single-agent + manual fix | references/local-review.md | — |

Pass $ARGUMENTS to the target file. For teams-review, also pass FIX_MODE

(low / low_medium / full).