Runs the loop from discovering a weakness to confirming it is fixed — scanning, triage, prioritization by real exploitability, remediation tracking, and patch policy. Use this to stand up or fix a vulnerability program, triage scanner output, decide what to fix first, set patch SLAs, handle a disclosure from an outside researcher, or report posture to leadership.
npx skills add https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount --skill vulnerability-management
Scanners are cheap and produce more findings than any team can fix. The whole discipline is deciding
what actually matters and closing those.
A published severity score describes the vulnerability in the abstract. What matters is your
instance of it. Rank by:
critical in a dependency you import but never call is not a critical for you.
nobody is using.
same bug on a build agent.
A queue sorted purely by severity guarantees the team spends its time on the wrong things while a
medium-rated, internet-facing, actively exploited bug waits.
Every finding gets one of four outcomes, each recorded: fix, mitigate, accept (with an
expiry and a named owner), or false positive (with the reason).
Nothing sits untriaged. An unreviewed backlog of thousands is the normal failure mode and it means
the program is not running, whatever the dashboard says.
Tune the scanner. Persistent false positives train the team to dismiss everything, including the
real finding.
Set SLAs by severity and exposure, publish them, and measure against them. Then measure the number
that breach the SLA — that number, not the raw count, is the health of the program.
Have an emergency path for actively exploited vulnerabilities that bypasses the normal cycle, agreed
in advance. Deciding how to ship an out-of-band patch during the incident wastes the hours that
matter.
Most findings will be in third-party code. Keep dependencies current continuously rather than in
large periodic jumps — a small regular upgrade is routine, a two-year jump is a project, and the
project gets deferred.
Know what you actually ship. A dependency inventory you cannot produce means you cannot answer "are
we affected" when the next widely-exploited library bug lands, and that question arrives with a
clock attached.
Publish a way to report a vulnerability and an address that is monitored. Researchers who cannot
find one disclose publicly instead.
Acknowledge quickly, give a realistic timeline, keep them updated, and credit them. Treating a
good-faith reporter as an adversary is how a private report becomes a public one.
Leadership needs: what is exposed and unfixed past SLA, the trend, and what needs a decision. Not
the count of findings, which mostly measures how much you scanned.
Take cbrock84/vulnerability-management from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.