Research Claude Skills
2 269 research skills from 396 authors. They find sources and get you up to speed on unfamiliar ground. Half of them fit into 2 278 tokens or less — that is what one costs your context window when the agent loads it. 663 ship runnable scripts rather than instructions alone. 4 of them cannot work without an MCP server, most often rube. We also found 291 copies of these same skills sitting in other people's repositories — counted once here, not 291 times.
2 269 unique 396 authors 3 updated this month 93 from vendors
Use when the user wants to search Turkish academic journals on DergiPark (keyword or advanced field search by title/author/abstract/DOI/ORCID/year/etc.), read a DergiPark article PDF as text, or extract an article's references — drives the user's own Chrome (no CAPTCHA solving needed) by injecting JavaScript.
Use when auditing a finished or near-finished AER, AER:Insights, or AEJ manuscript for internal consistency: headline numbers across abstract, introduction, results, and tables; sample sizes; log-point and percentage-point conversions; cross-references; and in-text-citation/bibliography matching. Apply after the body and exhibits exist, before aer-referee-sim and aer-submission.
Use when a complete draft exists and needs an adversarial internal review before submission — simulating the AER desk screen and three referee reports with calibrated severity, scoring the paper against the editorial rubric, and producing a prioritized revise list. Apply after aer-consistency passes and before aer-submission; rerun until the simulated verdict is at least major R&R.
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
Use when positioning a manuscript against the existing economics literature, building the antecedents map for the introduction, deciding what to cite, or verifying that every reference in the bibliography is real, correctly attributed, and cited to the published version. Apply at topic selection for the novelty scan and again before drafting the introduction.
Use when drafting or revising the body sections of an AER, AER:Insights, or AEJ manuscript — institutional background, data, empirical strategy, results, mechanisms, and conclusion. Covers equation conventions, results-paragraph narration, magnitude interpretation, and back-of-envelope policy calculations. Apply after the empirics are stable and before or alongside aer-introduction.
Use when evaluating whether a research idea clears the AER top-5 bar, when routing between AER, AER:Insights, and the AEJ family, or when sharpening a fuzzy contribution sentence into one publishable claim. Apply before any writing begins.
Research what's genuinely new about a topic in a recent time window. Use when the user asks what's new, recent, or trending on a subject and wants a source-grounded brief rather than a quick lookup.
| Generates a Microsoft-branded "What Cowork Did for Me" self-contained HTML impact report from the signed-in user's own Copilot Cowork session history in OneDrive. Quantifies leverage as a speed multiplier and a professional-services-equivalent value using research-anchored task-category bands and an artifact-scaled two-clock model, with a live hourly-rate control, KPIs, a work-by-business-process breakdown, a projects-by-category view, and an activity heatmap. Use when the user asks to "generate my impact summary report", "generate my impact report", "my impact summary", "my Cowork ROI", "what Cowork did for me", "Cowork impact report", "Copilot Cowork ROI report", "how much time has Cowork saved me", "my Cowork value report", or any request for a personal impact / ROI / value report on Copilot Cowork usage. or daily briefings.
Papers With Code CLI (`pwc`) for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, and benchmark leaderboards through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, `pwc`, or the `pwc-cli`. Prefer this skill for grounded AI/ML research even when the user does not explicitly ask for a CLI command.
| Simplicity-obsessed design reviewer that interrogates complexity, questions every abstraction, and insists on the minimal viable design. Sounds like a senior engineer who has watched too many systems collapse under their own weight and now treats every unnecessary layer as a personal affront. Not a generalist skeptic — a simplicity zealot. A lens for any checkpoint — brainstorm, design, plan, implement, debug, or review — not just design. a layer, an over-built fix — any time the worry is "do we actually need this, or can it be deleted?"
Research and plan a large-scale change, then execute it in parallel across isolated agents that each open a PR.
Delegate complex tasks to Amplifier's multi-agent framework. Use when: (1) research/comparison needing multiple perspectives, (2) multi-file code projects, (3) architecture/design reviews, (4) user asks for deep/thorough work. NOT for: simple Q&A, quick edits, casual chat, anything needing <5s response. CLI: amplifier-openclaw.