Productivity Claude Skills
3 457 productivity skills from 510 authors. They keep notes, tasks, calendars and plans in order. Half of them fit into 1 851 tokens or less — that is what one costs your context window when the agent loads it. 479 ship runnable scripts rather than instructions alone. 51 of them cannot work without an MCP server, most often rube. We also found 364 copies of these same skills sitting in other people's repositories — counted once here, not 364 times.
3 457 unique 510 authors 6 updated this month 293 from vendors
> VDR Index Setup skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a user wants to create, propose, design, or set up a Virtual Data Room (VDR) index VDR index", "build a deal room structure", "prepare the index", "set up the fileroom", "I need a data room for [deal/company]", or any request to organise or structure documents for due diligence. Also triggers when a user wants to replicate an existing deal room structure or import an index from a spreadsheet or reference deal. This skill MUST be used whenever the user is starting a new deal room or wants to customise the folder hierarchy before documents are uploaded. Do not use to audit or review an existing data room — use gap-analysis, document-quality-check, or risk-analysis-audit for that.
Use when the user asks for D&B Finance Analytics workflows such as customer onboarding, credit decisioning, credit limit validation, portfolio risk management, company reports, ownership trees, folder management, or alerts. Use only the D&B Finance Analytics MCP tools for these workflows.
Route early browser-game work. Use when the user needs stack selection and workflow planning across design, implementation, assets, and playtesting before moving to a specialist skill.
Build polished one-day Google Calendar briefs. Use when the user asks for today, tomorrow, or a specific date summary with an agenda, conflict flags, free windows, remaining-meeting readouts, or a calendar brief, and the Google Calendar connector is available.
Find and rank good meeting times for multiple people using connected Google Calendar data. Use when the user wants to schedule a group meeting, compare candidate slots across several attendees, find the best compromise time, or add a room check after narrowing the attendee-compatible options.
Find ways to open up meaningful free time in a connected Google Calendar. Use when the user wants to clear up their day, make room for focus time, create a longer uninterrupted block, or see the smallest set of calendar changes that would give time back.
Build a practical meeting prep brief from a connected Google Calendar event and its nearby context. Use when the user wants to prepare for an upcoming meeting, understand what to read beforehand, pull in linked notes or docs, or get a concise brief on what the meeting appears to require.
Manage scheduling and conflicts in connected Google Calendar data. Use when the user wants to inspect calendars, compare availability, review conflicts, find a meeting room, review event notes or attachments, add or adjust reminders, place temporary holds, or draft exact create, update, reschedule, or cancel changes with timezone-aware details.
Map GWAS loci to ranked candidate genes using a deterministic multi-skill chain (EFO -> GWAS -> coordinates -> Open Targets L2G/coloc -> eQTL -> burden/coding context), with reproducible tables and optional figures. Use when a user provides a trait/EFO term and/or lead variants and needs locus-to-gene prioritization for downstream biology decisions.
Route gh-aw workflow design/create/debug/upgrade requests to the right prompts.
List GitHub Actions workflows with per_page pagination support.
Analyze and reduce token consumption in agentic workflows — guardrail-specific entry points, measurement, and optimization techniques.
GitHub Agentic Workflows (`gh-aw`) is a GitHub CLI extension for writing Agentic Workflows in markdown and compiling them to GitHub Actions.
Write clear GitHub Actions step summaries with progressive disclosure.
用于研究任务的最终呈现形式未知时。比较研究报告、学术论文、表格优先报表、决策备忘录或自定义形式，并用权威标准与真实范例支持推荐。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
Run stepped HTTP load tests with ab/wrk, ramping concurrency levels to collect p50/p90/p99 latency, detect performance inflection points, and recommend optimal concurrency. Triggered by requests like 'load test this URL', 'benchmark my API', 'find the max concurrency', or mentions of p99 latency, throughput saturation, or capacity planning.
Software project effort estimation assistant. Outputs three-point estimates (optimistic/most-likely/pessimistic values with confidence intervals), T-shirt sizes, or Function Point Analysis (FPA) counts. Triggered when users ask 'how long will this feature take,' need to assess project workload, perform PERT estimation, T-shirt sizing, FPA, sprint planning, or quote-based effort breakdowns.
Builds compliance checklists for business scenarios involving GDPR, PIPL, or advertising/data laws. Outputs a structured checklist with check items, legal basis, risk levels, and actionable recommendations. Triggered by requests like \"run a compliance check,\" \"GDPR/PIPL compliance,\" \"pre-launch review,\" \"privacy impact assessment (PIA/DPIA),\" or asking if a feature is compliant.
Agentic Workflow Pattern
Interactive workspace discovery - learn what tools, workflows, agents, and hooks are available
Planning agent that creates implementation plans and handoffs from conversation context
Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches
Store a learning, pattern, or decision in the memory system for future recall
Upgrade any skill to v5 Hybrid format using decision theory + modal logic
Goal-based workflow orchestration - routes tasks to specialist agents based on user goals
Autonomously work on Jira backlog tickets, creating PRs and shepherding them to merge
Fetch a Jira issue and propose an implementation plan based on codebase analysis
>- Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication, community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release workflows, and issue templates.
>- Use this skill to triage a single newly opened, reopened, or `status/needs-triage`-labelled issue in microsoft/apm. Emit one synthesized comment with a triage decision, label set, milestone, and suggested next action.
>- Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.
>- Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication, community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release workflows, and issue templates.
>- Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.
Deterministic end-to-end driver for day-0 quantized-checkpoint releases — chains PTQ → evaluation → comparison with enforced gates between stages (the evaluation stage deploys the checkpoint itself), and returns a publish decision (ACCEPT / REGRESSION / ANOMALOUS / INFEASIBLE). Use when the user asks to "release a model at day-0", "quantize and validate model X is within N% of baseline and tell me if it's publishable", or "run the full day-0 workflow". Do NOT use for single-stage requests — quantizing only (use ptq), serving only (use deployment), evaluating only (use evaluation), or comparing two existing runs (use compare-results).
>- Run explicitly requested ModelOpt Quantization-Aware Distillation (QAD) on Slurm through Megatron Bridge to recover a measured BF16-to-PTQ accuracy gap. Use only when the user explicitly asks for QAD, including its topology, data preparation, Slurm launch, resume, checkpoint export, or recovery decisions.
> GSC-driven content calendar. Pulls real Search Console data, finds the highest click-potential opportunities (striking-distance queries at positions 5-20, unanswered query intent, related-keyword expansions), and produces a dated, prioritized content calendar — ready to hand to /content-writer. Use when the user asks "plan my content", "what should I write next", "content calendar", "content plan", "content roadmap", "editorial calendar", "what topics will rank", "find quick-win SEO topics", "click-potential analysis", or "schedule my SEO content".
Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.
Security payloads, bypass tables, wordlists, gf pattern names, always-rejected bug list, and conditionally-valid-with-chain table. Use when you need specific payloads for XSS/SSRF/SQLi/XXE/NoSQLi/command injection/SSTI/IDOR/path-traversal/HTTP smuggling/WebSocket/MFA bypass, or bypass techniques. Submittability and the always-rejected / what-NOT-to-submit decision are owned by triage-validation.
Finding validation before writing any report — 7-Question Gate (all 7 questions), 4 pre-submission gates, always-rejected list, conditionally valid with chain table, CVSS 3.1 quick reference, severity decision guide, report title formula, 60-second pre-submit checklist. Use BEFORE writing any report. One wrong answer = kill the finding and move on. Saves N/A ratio.
How to work in a Personal CRM project (the `entity-vault` starter pack, GBrain-compatible): a typed-entity vault of people, companies, meetings, and concepts, each a dossier with a rewritable summary plus an append-only timeline. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to capture notes about a person or company, log a meeting, prep for an upcoming meeting, or answer who someone is and what was last said. Carries the dossier convention and entity-extraction behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
Promote existing research into a canonical article under `articles/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when a decision has actually been made and the team wants the source-of-truth written down, or when asked to consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede an older article. Carries the decision-confirmation gate, the `supersedes:` chain that keeps the evidence trail intact, and the canonical voice. Does not conduct new research — that is the sibling `research` skill.
How to work in an OKF starter project (the `okf` starter pack): a knowledge base that is conformant with Google's Open Knowledge Format (OKF) from commit one — `concepts/`, `references/`, `notes/`, a reserved `index.md` navigation hub, and a reserved `log.md` change history. Read when the project has these folders plus reserved files, OR when asked whether a document is OKF-conformant, or to add a document to an OKF knowledge base. Carries the OKF conventions (non-empty `type` on every non-reserved doc; reserved files carry no frontmatter) as guidance, not enforcement. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
How to work in a Plain Notes project (the `plain-notes` starter pack): a flat notes/ folder plus a daily/ journal. The 'I just want to write' layout. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to jot a note, capture a quick thought, or write today's journal entry. Carries the linking habit and daily-entry behavior so templates and folder descriptions stay minimal. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
How to work in a Software Lifecycle project (the `software-lifecycle` starter pack): proposals → decisions → specs → postmortems, plus guides. Read when the project has these folders, or when asked how this project is organized. Carries the doc lifecycle, status flows, and per-folder agent behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. The five workflows — frame a proposal, write a spec, record a decision, write a postmortem, review a design — each ship as their own sibling skill in this pack. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).
Records an architecture decision as a Nygard/MADR-shaped ADR under decisions/ — capturing the context that forced the choice, the options weighed, the decision itself, and its consequences in both directions, plus the supersedes chain that keeps a decision log honest. Read when asked to record an architecture decision, write an ADR, log the decision we made, document why we chose X over Y, capture this decision for the record, or supersede an old decision with a new one. Do NOT read to frame a proposal or explore an idea not yet decided (frame-a-proposal), to write a spec or implementation plan (write-a-spec), to write an incident postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or to judge whether a design is sound (review-a-design). This skill records a decision already made; it does not make one.
Reviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).
Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.