2 253 document skills from 443 authors. They read and assemble documents, spreadsheets and slide decks. Half of them fit into 1 829 tokens or less — that is what one costs your context window when the agent loads it. 571 ship runnable scripts rather than instructions alone. 24 of them cannot work without an MCP server, most often rube. We also found 384 copies of these same skills sitting in other people's repositories — counted once here, not 384 times.
2 253 unique 443 authors 1 294 updated this month 183 from vendors
Facilitate a structured conversation to define architecture principles for a repository. Supports multiple architecture styles: clean architecture (default), hexagonal / ports & adapters, modular monolith, or custom. Produces a formal architecture document that the corresponding atom will use. Use when setting up a new project, defining architecture standards, or when the user says 'setup architecture', 'define layers', 'architecture principles', 'help me define my architecture', 'hexagonal architecture', 'modular monolith', 'ports and adapters', or 'define my architecture style'.
Facilitate a structured conversation to define DDD guardrails for domain design within a repository. Produces a formal ddd-principles.md document that the domain-driven-design atom will use as its override. Use when setting up domain design principles, defining aggregate rules, or when the user says 'setup DDD', 'define domain rules', 'DDD principles', or 'help me define my domain patterns'.
Load project-specific context -- tech stack, architecture overview, directory layout, trusted sources, and conventions -- so that all skills operate with awareness of what this project actually is. Use when a knowledge base document exists, or when the user asks about the project's tech stack, architecture, conventions, framework, directory layout, or says 'tell me about this project', 'what are we using?', 'what's our stack?', or 'what framework is this?'. Use the knowledge-priming-refiner to create a knowledge base document.
Facilitate a structured conversation to create a project-specific knowledge base document. Produces a knowledge-base.md that primes AI with the project's tech stack, architecture, trusted sources, and project structure. Use when the user says 'set up knowledge base', 'prime the project', 'onboard AI', 'create knowledge base', 'set up project context', or 'configure AI context'.
Manage the operational learnings lifecycle — load prior learnings to inform current work, harvest new patterns worth preserving, and keep the document tight over time. Provides a protocol for accumulating actionable patterns from practice that complement standards and defaults. Use when a workflow session completes and produced insights worth persisting, when starting a session that should benefit from prior patterns, or when the user says 'harvest learnings', 'what have we learned', 'capture this pattern', 'tighten learnings', 'compress learnings', or 'operational learnings'.
Facilitate a structured conversation to customize how the review molecule works -- atom loading rules, severity classification, report format, scope rules, insight capture, and health logging. Produces a formal review-standards.md document that the review molecule will use as its process configuration. Use when the user says 'customize review', 'configure review', 'review preferences', 'review settings', 'change review process', or 'set up review'.
Use when the user wants to audit Amazon returns or Amazon-billed subscriptions, mentions a restocking fee, short or denied refund, forgotten Prime Video Channel, Audible, Kindle Unlimited, or Prime charge, or asks whether Amazon still owes or bills them. Read order, refund, and subscription evidence first; report findings and require confirmation before chat, cancellation, or dispute. The documented cases recovered $448.31, but never promise recovery. Requires an authenticated Claude in Chrome session. NOT FOR: bank chargebacks, marketplace A-to-z seller claims, price-protection claims, or subscriptions billed outside Amazon — use subscription-recovery for those.
Run the weak-agent adversarial test harness against docx-cli. Spawns weak exercise agents (Haiku by default, Sonnet to probe, or a local agent harness's pre-produced runs) to perform real document tasks over six scenarios — five editing (MNDA form-fill + font fidelity, invoice table-edit/restructure + logo replace, résumé styling, contract redlining + commenting, contract finalize via accept/reject + comment reply/resolve) and one authoring (T. S. Eliot poetry journal: multi-column, verse, footnotes, links, figure) — renders every result with Word, has opus judge them against ground-truth rubrics, measures each exercise's tool economy, token cost, wall-clock, and correctness (from transcripts for Claude, the exercise.json ledger for the local harness), and synthesizes a prioritized ergonomics report. Use when the user says 'adversarial review', 'test docx-cli with weak agents', 'run the haiku harness', 'weak agent test', or wants to re-run yesterday's adversarial process.
Read, edit, redline, comment on, and create Microsoft Word .docx files. Use to fill out or edit a Word doc, redline a contract with tracked changes, add/resolve comments, replace text keeping its formatting, restyle headings/fonts, edit tables, or read/extract a .docx as Markdown or text. Also BUILD a new .docx — from Markdown or programmatically (code that outputs a Word report with headings, tables, images). Not for PDF, Google Docs, Excel, PowerPoint, or .doc.
小红书 / 抖音 / 快手 / 视频号 自媒体「(compose 素材打底 →) 找对标 → 拆爆款 → 套自己」四命令闭环。给我的账号 / 选题方向 / 原始素材(文档/图片/视频),吐出"可发的下一条笔记初稿"。当用户说"找对标"、"拆这条爆款"、"对着这条仿写"、"下一条该写什么"、"我这个号缺爆款选题"、"帮我写一条对标 XX 的笔记"、"我有素材帮我写一条能爆的"、"这份文档/这组图/这段视频能出一条爆款吗"时调用。诊断模式("为什么不爆")走 references/diagnostic-mode.md。
Generate beautiful, high-resolution mindmaps from Markdown unordered lists. Outputs interactive HTML, HD PNG, and PDF with colorful branch themes.
Use when the user wants a paper audited for integrity issues — image misuse, numerical anomalies, logical gaps — and needs a reviewable evidence report. Works on external papers (PDF / DOI / arXiv) and on outputs from a local paper-writer run. Single-stage skill.
Design and implement end-to-end client onboarding workflows from prospect intake through funded account, covering KYC verification, document collection, e-signature, and custodian submission. Use when the user asks about building a digital onboarding flow, integrating identity verification or CIP checks, reducing NIGO rejection rates, opening complex account types like trusts or entities, connecting to custodian APIs, designing suitability questionnaires, or comparing advisor-assisted vs self-service models. Also trigger when users mention 'new account opening', 'onboarding bottleneck', 'KYC integration', 'beneficial ownership', 'OFAC screening', 'account funding', or 'onboarding automation'.
Design and operate back-office account opening pipelines from application intake through custodian submission and activation. Use when building account opening automation, reducing NIGO rejection rates from custodians or clearing firms, defining document requirements for trusts, entities, IRAs, or estate accounts, setting up multi-custodian account opening across Schwab, Fidelity, or Pershing, troubleshooting account opening failures or processing delays, or benchmarking cycle times and first-submission acceptance rates. For risk-based approval tiers and compliance screening requirements, see account-opening-compliance.
Guide the design and maintenance of recordkeeping programs under SEC Rules 17a-3, 17a-4, and 204-2. Use when the user asks about document retention schedules, how long to keep trade records or customer complaints, WORM storage requirements, email or text message archiving, social media capture, BYOD compliance policies, or electronic storage audit trails. Also trigger when users mention 'we got an exam request for records', 'migrating to a new archiving vendor', 'blotter retention', 'order ticket requirements', 'off-channel communications', 'WhatsApp archiving', or ask how long specific records must be kept.
Guide which client disclosure documents must exist, what each must contain, and when and how they must be delivered to clients of investment advisers and broker-dealers. Use when the user asks about Form ADV Part 2A or 2B content, Form CRS content and delivery, prospectus delivery obligations, privacy notice delivery, trade confirmation timing, account statement distribution, electronic vs paper delivery compliance, or the content and client-delivery side of the annual brochure update. Also trigger when users mention 'onboarding document checklist', 'what disclosures do we owe new clients', 'brochure supplement for a new adviser', or 'CRS conversation starters'. (For filing mechanics and regulatory deadlines — IARD amendments, Form PF, 13F — use regulatory-reporting; for whether fee disclosure content is adequate, use fee-disclosure.)
Prepare for and respond to SEC and FINRA regulatory examinations across the full exam lifecycle. Use when the user asks about exam notification letters, document request lists, deficiency letter responses, mock examination programs, annual compliance reviews under Rule 206(4)-7, or SEC/FINRA examination priorities. Also trigger when users mention 'we just got an exam letter', 'preparing for our first SEC exam', 'how to respond to a deficiency finding', 'staff interview preparation', 'what does OCIE look for', 'examination readiness checklist', 'sweep exam on off-channel comms', or ask what to expect during a regulatory audit.
Evaluate whether the substance of fee and cost disclosures is complete, accurate, and not misleading across advisory, brokerage, fund, and retirement plan contexts. Use when the user asks whether Form ADV Item 5 fee content is adequate, prospectus fee table format, Reg BI cost disclosure content, 12b-1 fee transparency, revenue sharing arrangements, wrap fee program cost-effectiveness, or ERISA 408(b)(2)/404a-5 fee disclosure content. Also trigger when users mention 'hidden fees', 'total cost to the client', 'are we disclosing all layers of fees', 'expense ratio comparison', 'fee billing in advance vs arrears', 'share class selection', or 'indirect compensation'. (For which disclosure documents must exist and when they are delivered, use client-disclosures.)
Construct comprehensive Investment Policy Statements governing return objectives, risk tolerance, and portfolio constraints. Use when the user asks about building an IPS, setting return objectives, assessing risk tolerance, defining investment constraints, or establishing rebalancing and benchmark policies. Also trigger when users mention 'investment plan', 'policy portfolio', 'risk capacity vs willingness', 'spending rate for an endowment', 'foundation payout', 'manager selection criteria', or ask how to document their investment strategy.
> Use when creating or modifying Frappe Workflows, defining states and transitions, adding action conditions, or troubleshooting workflow permission errors. Prevents stuck documents from misconfigured transitions, missing state permissions, and circular workflow paths. Covers Workflow DocType, workflow states, transitions, actions, conditions (Python expressions), workflow permissions, workflow_state field, Workflow Action DocType.
> Use when debugging or preventing errors in Frappe Document Controllers. Prevents autoname failures, validate loops, on_submit without is_submittable, wrong lifecycle hook choice, get_list permission errors, NestedSet errors, extend_doctype_class conflicts, missing super() calls, and recursion without flags. Covers error diagnosis by lifecycle phase for v14/v15/v16. get_list, NestedSet, extend_doctype_class, super, flags, recursion guard.
> Use when debugging or handling permission errors in Frappe/ERPNext. Prevents broken document access from throwing in permission hooks. Covers PermissionError (403), has_permission hook failures, User Permission restricting too much or too little, perm_level blocking field access, System Manager bypass not working, Guest access denied, sharing permissions not applying, permission_query_conditions breaking get_list, owner-based permissions confusion, Apply User Permission checkbox behavior, and the permission debug workflow using frappe.permissions.get_doc_permissions. User Permission, perm_level, sharing, guest access, owner permission.
> file creation, lifecycle hooks, validation, autoname, submittable workflows, controller override, child table controllers, flags system, controller, which hook to use, validate vs on_update, override controller, submittable document, autoname, flags, extend_doctype_class, controller testing, child table controller, which hook to use, when does validate run, how to override save, document lifecycle.
> document validation, auto-fill, API endpoints, scheduled tasks, permission queries. Covers sandbox-safe coding, script type selection, script, which script type, sandbox limitation, Document Event, API script, Scheduler Event, Permission Query, migrate to controller, no-code automation, run code on save, auto-fill field, server-side validation, scheduled script.
> Use when implementing document Workflows, approval chains, or state-based transitions in Frappe. Prevents stuck documents from missing transitions, broken approval chains, and permission errors on workflow actions. Covers Workflow DocType, Workflow State, Workflow Action, transition rules, allowed roles, conditions, workflow_state field, apply_workflow.
> Use when writing Python Document Controllers for ERPNext/Frappe DocTypes. Covers lifecycle hooks (validate, on_update, on_submit), controller override, submittable documents, autoname patterns, UUID naming (v16), validate, on_update, on_submit, autoname, naming series, flags, v14-v16, controller example, lifecycle hook order, when to use validate, Python DocType class.
> Use when implementing document lifecycle hooks via doc_events in hooks.py, understanding event execution order, or extending/overriding document behavior from another app. Prevents silent hook failures from wrong event names, incorrect execution order assumptions, and broken override chains. Covers doc_events hook syntax, all document events (before_insert, validate, on_submit, etc.), event execution order, extend vs override behavior, cross-app doc_events.
> Use when writing Jinja templates for ERPNext/Frappe Print Formats, Email Templates, and Portal Pages. Covers template syntax, context variables, filters, macros, and v16 Chrome PDF rendering. Prevents common mistakes email template, portal page, template syntax, PDF, v14-v16, template syntax, Jinja example, print format code, how to show child table in print.
> Use when configuring Frappe hooks.py for app events, scheduler tasks, document events, fixtures, boot session, jenv customization, or website hooks.py, doc_events, scheduler_events, fixtures, app_include_js, override_whitelisted_methods, extend_doctype_class, hooks.py example, how to register hook, available hooks list, extend_doctype_class example.
> Use when creating print formats or generating PDFs in Frappe v14-v16. Covers Jinja print formats, Print Designer [v15+], Letter Head, PDF generation API (get_pdf, download_pdf), Report print formats ({%= %} syntax), page breaks, and print CSS patterns. Prevents common mistakes with template engine confusion and PDF rendering. wkhtmltopdf, WeasyPrint, page-break, download_pdf.
把srt字幕文件转换成markdown笔记
> Builds a feature specification from scratch with plan-a-feature and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location, posting the spec as a parent page and each companion artifact (decision log, team findings, technical notes) as a child page beneath it. Use when the user wants a new feature planned, designed, scoped, or specified AND posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not plan to local files only — use plan-a-feature. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence.
> Publishes a local Markdown file to a user-specified Confluence location, creating a new page or updating an existing one through the Atlassian MCP server. Use when the user wants to post, publish, push, or sync a Markdown file to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not write or generate the Markdown itself — point it at an existing file, or use project-documentation-to-confluence for the document-then-publish flow, or plan-a-feature-to-confluence for the plan-then-publish flow. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
> Creates or updates project documentation for a feature, system, or component and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants feature or system documentation written to Confluence, posted to a Confluence space or page, or synced to a Confluence location. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not document to local files only — use project-documentation for that. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence for that. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence for that. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard. Does not produce runbooks — use runbook.
> Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
> Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
> Update Han plugin documentation so every skill, agent, guidance doc, index, and cross-reference is current and accurate. On a non-default branch, scopes the pass to entities the branch actually touched. On the default branch, performs a full documentation sweep across the whole plugin. Use when updating, refreshing, syncing, auditing, or verifying Han's docs after changing skills, agents, references, or top-level guidance — including "update the docs", "doc sweep", "refresh documentation", "audit the docs", "make sure the docs are current". This is a repository-maintenance skill for the Han repo itself, not a general documentation skill — use /project-documentation to document features in arbitrary projects, /han-release to cut a release (and update CHANGELOG), and /update-pr-description for PR bodies.
> Creates and updates coding standards, conventions, rules, and guidelines for the current project. Use when creating new standards from scratch, converting existing documents into coding standards, or updating existing standards. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not write feature or system documentation — use project-documentation for that. Does not research open-ended options — use research. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that.
> Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.
> Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.
> Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research.
> Convert a stakeholder summary markdown file into a single self-contained HTML executive report — bottom line and decision asks up front, supporting detail later — styled with a Test Double-derived palette and self-contained mermaid diagrams. Use when the user wants to turn a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary into an HTML report, generate an HTML version of a summary doc, or produce a shareable HTML file from a summary markdown. Produces an HTML sibling file only; does not publish anything.
>- 根据策略描述、研报 PDF 或截图,解读因子/选股逻辑,基于 scripts/daily-factors-backtest.py 框架生成 QMT 内置日频因子回测脚本。用户提到 QMT 内置回测、因子选股回测、截面因子、 研报复现、handlebar 回测、after_init 预计算信号时使用。
> {{customDescription}}
面向“学习任何知识”的通用导师型 skill。用于用户想学习新主题、制定学习计划、整理学习笔记、做课后复盘、生成项目任务书、做掌握度检查,或希望基于自己资料与外部权威资料进行中文导师式陪学时。默认采用“导师 + 项目教练”模式,以项目驱动和 Mastery Learning 推进;当用户未提供资料时,主动查找官方文档、原始资料、经典教材、权威机构材料与最佳实践,并区分事实依据与建议判断。
> branded PowerPoint. Edits only the slides/objects the user names, using native editable objects, while keeping every other slide, the logo, masters, links, grouping and transparency byte-for-byte unchanged, and writes back a .pptx that opens clean in WPS / PowerPoint. Use automatically when the user asks to revise, fix, refine, restyle, or repair an existing presentation, including phrases such as "改PPT", "修改PPT", "修改这份PPT", "把这个ppt改一下", "调整这几页", "只改第X页", "保真修改", "别动其他页", "edit this pptx", "fix my slides", "revise this deck", "refine these slides", "repair the pptx". It can also generate a new editable PPTX or magazine web deck from source material (PDF/DOCX/XLSX/URL/Markdown) when asked — "create PPT", "make a deck", "生成PPT", "做PPT", "制作演示文稿", "把这个做成PPT", "杂志风PPT", "网页PPT" — but preserve-and-edit is the primary, differentiated mode. Also triggers on "ultimate-ppt-master", "保真改PPT", "deckweaver", or "ppt-master".
Use when a task involves continuing a project, restoring project context, maintaining file-based project memory, updating current-state summaries, or recording meaningful progress across sessions. Works best for long-horizon, file-based projects and supports research writing, product document collaboration, software project coordination, and broader cross-functional project continuity.
用于审阅AI科幻故事设定、手法、系统逻辑链与数据痕载体文档。作为题材包装层与兼容入口,负责补充异常数据、系统摩擦与技术代价等题材裁判口径,并明确要求优先强制加载并使用 `通用-审阅故事设定`。关键词:AI科幻设定审阅、系统逻辑链、数据痕载体、规则代价。