2 226 document skills from 443 authors. They read and assemble documents, spreadsheets and slide decks. Half of them fit into 1 834 tokens or less — that is what one costs your context window when the agent loads it. 567 ship runnable scripts rather than instructions alone. 24 of them cannot work without an MCP server, most often rube. We also found 384 copies of these same skills sitting in other people's repositories — counted once here, not 384 times.
2 226 unique 443 authors 1 278 updated this month 156 from vendors
Compatibility entry point for scenario-led creation, Design Files, brand systems, inspecting, revising, restyling, and exporting Codex Slides slide decks. Use when a user asks Codex to make a presentation, use project files, edit an existing deck, manage slide structure, apply brand or template rules, or export PDF/PPTX.
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.
中文文档生成器 - 从代码库自动生成中文技术文档
>- Synthesizes raw learnings and codebase analysis into an interlinked Markdown Knowledge Base (KB). Use at the beginning of a loop to build or update architecture.md, entities, and vulnerabilities. Don't use for generating threat models or formulating execution plans.
Produce the Part 5 Client Validation Document — the one true stop where unbiased v1 findings meet the client. Each finding gets ACCEPT/REJECT/EDIT/DEFER decision.
Produce the Four Core Documents at strategic depth (61 total steps): Business & SBU Analysis, Segmentation Framework, Brand Positioning, DMFlow. Use when running Part 3 of the engagement methodology.
Generate branded PDF reports. Use when: creating executive summaries, campaign reports, or client deliverables.
Audit already-implemented Data warehouse import sources for endpoints, schemas, and tables the vendor's API offers but we never wired up. Use when asked whether a source is missing endpoints, to find new endpoints a vendor has added since a source was built, to refresh COVERAGE_GAPS.md, to prioritize which source to deepen next, or to check coverage before an integration review. Covers dumping our real endpoint inventory credential-free, ranking sources by production adoption, diffing against vendor OpenAPI/GraphQL specs, and recording findings. Not for implementing a source (use implementing-warehouse-sources), adding a vendor API version (warehouse-source-new-version), or writing source docs (documenting-warehouse-sources).
Write or update the user-facing posthog.com documentation for a PostHog Data warehouse import source. Use when adding a new source doc, fixing an inconsistent or stub source doc, or standardizing the docs at contents/docs/cdp/sources. Covers the canonical template, shared snippets, the auto-rendered <SourceParameters /> and <SourceTables /> components, frontmatter, and the docsUrl/slug rule that prevents 404s.
Use when adding timers (`setInterval`, `setTimeout`), event listeners (`window.addEventListener`, `document.addEventListener`, `MediaQueryList.addEventListener`), or any other resource that needs cleanup inside a kea logic. Every logic has `cache.disposables.add(setup, key?, options?)` and `cache.disposables.dispose(key)` available via the globally registered `disposablesPlugin` (`frontend/src/kea-disposables.ts`). Replaces the bare `cache.foo = setInterval(...)` + `beforeUnmount: clearInterval(cache.foo)` pattern and auto-pauses background work when the tab is hidden.
Documentation creation criteria including PRD, ADR, Design Doc, and Work Plan requirements with templates. Use when creating or reviewing technical documents, or determining which documents are required.
Create frontend work plan from design document and obtain plan approval
Update existing design documents (Design Doc / PRD / ADR) with review
Execute from codebase analysis to design document creation
Create work plan from design document and obtain plan approval
Execute from codebase analysis to design document creation
Create work plan from design document and obtain plan approval
资深高考命题专家助手,提供专业的命题指导和评审服务。适用于创作高考试题、评审试题质量、分析试卷结构、了解命题趋势等场景。结合文档工具提取解压文件,使用网络搜索了解当年最新命题趋势,使用分析工具评估题目质量和试卷结构。涵盖"一核四层四翼"评价体系、题型规范、评分标准、命题流程等多个维度。不用于:大学/考研/中考命题(体系不同,仅可借鉴)、日常作业题编写、直接替考生解题。
| 将天气要素（风速、能见度、降雨量等）单站预报系统的项目文档、模型、报告、评估结果整理成符合省级自然科学基金项目编写规范的专题研究报告。适用于：(1) 基于Claude Code + OpenSpec开发的气象预报系统结题报告编写，(2) 将技术文档转换为学术研究报告格式，(3) 生成符合省级自然科学基金规范的专题研究报告，(4) 整合项目代码、模型、评估指标等技术材料为规范化学术报告。触发关键词："专题研究报告"、"结题报告"、"天气预报系统"、"基金项目报告"、"风速预报"、"能见度预报"、"降雨量预报"、"气象预测"、"单站预报"等。
用 MinerU 将复杂PDF文档转换为LLM友好的Markdown/JSON格式。适用于：(1) PDF转Markdown/JSON，(2) 提取PDF中的文本、表格、公式、图像，(3) 解析学术论文、技术文档、商业报告，(4) 为RAG应用准备文档数据，(5) 批量处理PDF。触发关键词："PDF解析"、"PDF转Markdown"、"提取PDF表格/公式"、"MinerU"、"parse PDF"等。不用于：PDF的阅读/填表/签名/拆分合并（用宿主pdf工具）、Word/PPT等非PDF格式解析、只需读几页内容的场景（直接读即可，不必转换）。
Generates comprehensive documentation explaining how a codebase works, including architecture, key components, data flow, and development guidelines. Use when user wants to understand unfamiliar code, create onboarding docs, document architecture, or explain how the system works.
> Process raw source documents into wiki pages. Use when the user adds files to raw/ and wants them ingested, says "process this source", "ingest this article", "I added something to raw/", or wants to incorporate new material into their knowledge base.
> Answer questions against the knowledge base wiki. Use when the user asks a question about their collected knowledge, wants to explore connections between topics, says "what do I know about X", or wants to search their wiki.
> Set up a new Obsidian knowledge base with the LLM Wiki pattern. Use when the user wants to create a second brain, initialize a vault, set up a personal knowledge base, or says "onboard". Guides through an interactive wizard to configure vault name, location, domain, agent support, and tooling.
> Register a new environment variable / configuration option in dd-trace-py. Use whenever you add (or rename) a DD_*/_DD_*/OTEL_*/DATADOG_* environment variable so it is documented, validated, and tracked for cross-language feature parity. Covers supported-configurations.json, the generated _supported_configurations.py module, docs/configuration.rst, and the feature-parity registry hand-off.
This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.
Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.
>- Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."
Rédaction d'assignations en référé devant le tribunal de commerce ou des activités économiques pour le droit de communication d'un associé. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer ou créer une assignation en référé fondée sur l'article L. 238-1 du code de commerce pour obtenir la communication forcée de documents sociaux (comptes annuels, rapports de gestion, PV d'assemblées, etc.) lorsqu'un dirigeant refuse ou fait obstruction à la communication de ces documents à un associé.
Assistant juridique expert en droit français. Recherches, consultations, rédaction d'actes, contre-argumentaires, analyses de contrats et de pièces, veille, vérification et harmonisation de références. Produit des documents Word (computer use) ou des réponses conversationnelles structurées. MCP : OpenLegi, Themia, LegalDataHunter. Déclencher pour toute question juridique, tout concept de droit français (contrat, responsabilité, jurisprudence, code civil, tribunal, indemnisation), toute question sur le droit de l'UE, la CJUE ou la CEDH, et toute demande de vérification ou harmonisation de références bibliographiques juridiques.
Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banner, consent flow, controller and DPO contact, data subject rights channel, cross-border transfer disclosures, AZ operator-registration references) and scores each against the applicable statutory requirements. Produces a dual-layer report: a plain-language traffic-light summary for business owners plus a clause-by-clause findings table with article-level citations for lawyers. Assessment-only — no drafting. Use whenever the user shares a URL or privacy/cookie policy text for an AZ-based or AZ-targeted site; also when the user mentions an .az domain, Law 998, the AZ State Register, ePrivacy, an Art. 27 EU representative, or asks "is my site GDPR compliant", "do I need to register as an operator in Azerbaijan", or "is our cookie banner lawful" — even without the word "audit".
Builds a litigation chronology from the disclosure bundle itself — every entry attributed to its source document, behind a CPR 31.22 implied-undertaking check, because documents disclosed in English proceedings may only be used for those proceedings. Adds a privilege screen and case-theory significance tagging, so the output is court-facing work product, not a loose timeline. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a disclosure bundle, a matter file, or witness statements, or says 'build the chron', 'what happened when', or needs a Statement of Facts ready timeline.
Build a client instruction schedule — a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Use whenever the user asks for a "client instruction schedule", "instruction schedule", "client questionnaire", "schedule of questions for the client", "get instructions from the client on the papers", or says the client is overwhelmed and needs the case broken into manageable questions. Also trigger when asked to turn case papers into a structured request for client input. Do NOT use for court-facing Scott Schedules, pleadings, witness statements, or advice letters — this skill produces a client-facing working document only. Output is always a .docx draft for solicitor review, never a final document.
Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.
This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.
AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.
Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies. Use when defining who reviews a document and in what order, tracking where a document is stuck in the approval chain, chasing an overdue reviewer, preventing reviewers working on superseded drafts, or mapping dependencies between documents across jurisdictions. Trigger on: 'who needs to approve this', 'document approval', 'review sequence', 'stuck in review', 'overdue approval', 'who has the document', 'version control', 'wrong version', 'document dependency', 'NL SPA waiting on German opinion', 'approval cascade', 'review chain', 'document circulation', 'chasing the partner', 'client approval process', 'where is the document'.
Performs structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as compliant, at-risk, or non-compliant with reasoning, and proposes ready-to-use model replacement language.
Use for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulatory, compliance, technology/product, and financial-model issues must be separated clearly.
> Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.
> Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.
Analyze any OFAC or OFSI enforcement action — by URL, pasted text, or uploaded document — and produce a structured root cause analysis as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheet. Use this skill whenever a user names, links to, pastes, or uploads an OFAC or OFSI enforcement action and asks for any of the following: root cause analysis, compliance gaps, what went wrong, lessons learned, organizational self-assessment, or remediation planning. Also trigger when a user asks \"analyze this enforcement action\", \"what were the root causes\", \"turn this into a checklist\", or \"how do I make sure this doesn't happen to us\". Outputs a single-sheet .xlsx table with six columns: Root Cause | What Went Wrong | How It Went Wrong | What Could Have Stopped It | Is my organization immune to this? (Yes/No/Partial) | Notes.
| Generates a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate an AI Act report", "create a compliance assessment report", "document the AI Act analysis", "create a Prüfbericht", "export as Word document", or wants to consolidate prior AI Act skill outputs into a formal documented assessment.
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like \"is this GDPR compliant?\", \"how do I handle personal data?\", \"what does a privacy policy need?\", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.
Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures, and anyone asking \"is this HIPAA compliant?\" or \"what does HIPAA require for X?\". When in doubt about whether a healthcare or data privacy question falls under this skill — use it.
Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say \"skill\" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.
> Pick the right LLM for LEGAL INFO EXTRACTION — pulling facts, clauses, dates, parties, obligations, and structured fields out of contracts and legal documents. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Info Extraction; CUAD/MAUD/ACORD). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to extract clauses/data from these documents", "best AI for contract data extraction", "route this extraction task", or is about to pull structured fields from legal docs without a fixed model.