mcpbeat Sign in

Journey Plan Skill for Claude

Use as stage 2 of the Butterbase journey, after journey-idea has written 01-idea.md. Translates the idea + capability map into a concrete Butterbase plan — tables (with columns/types/RLS shape), auth providers, function list (name + trigger), storage buckets, AI/RAG/realtime/durable usage, and the chosen frontend stack. In hackathon mode, ruthlessly cuts scope into a "ship now" vs "post-hackathon" split. Produces docs/butterbase/02-plan.md.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
532
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/butterbase-ai/butterbase-skills --skill journey-plan

The instruction itself

9 sections, as written by the author

Journey: Plan

Stage 2 of the guided journey. Turn the idea brief into an actionable Butterbase plan.

When to use

  • Dispatched by journey when current_stage: plan.
  • Directly via /butterbase-skills:plan.

Inputs

  • docs/butterbase/01-idea.md (must exist — if absent, bounce back to journey-idea).
  • docs/butterbase/00-state.md (for hackathon_mode, hackathon_deadline).

External services — check built-ins first

When the plan needs email, messaging, calendar, CRM, docs, or project-management integration:

  • Invoke butterbase-skills:integrations and call manage_integrations action: "list_available" to see what Composio covers for this app.
  • If a toolkit fits, the plan should record "via manage_integrations (toolkit: <name>)" instead of naming an external SDK.

When the plan needs payments:

  • Invoke butterbase-skills:payments.
  • Default to Stripe Connect via manage_billing unless the user's region forces a fallback (see the payments skill).
  • Record the choice ("Stripe Connect" or "<regional gateway> via function proxy") in the plan's Payments section.

Procedure

Work through these sections in order. After each section, write the result to 02-plan.md before moving on. One question at a time per the spec's questioning discipline.

  • Tables. Read the capability map. Propose a starter table list with columns and types — recommend, don't ask blank. Example: "Tables I'm seeing: users, orders, items. Missing any?" Then for each table: "<table>.<column>: should this be a uuid / text / int / timestamp / enum?". Confirm primary keys, foreign keys, indexes that are obvious (foreign-key columns).
  • RLS model. For each table: "Can user A see user B's <table> rows? ① no, strict isolation ② yes, public-read ③ only shared via explicit grant." Decide policy shape. In hackathon mode, prefer option ① and recommend manage_rls action: create_user_isolation.
  • Auth. "OAuth providers: ① Google only ② Google + GitHub ③ email/password too ④ none (anonymous app)." Also ask: "Need a demo / judge account seeded? (hackathon mode only)".
  • Functions. For each function from the capability map: "<name>: trigger = HTTP / cron / WebSocket? If cron: schedule? If HTTP: idempotency needed?".
  • Storage. If used: "Which objects (avatars, attachments, …)? Public-read or per-user?".
  • AI / RAG / realtime / durable. Only if used. Capture model choice (AI), collections (RAG), tables to subscribe to (realtime), object kinds (durable).

6b. Agents. Only if create_agent is tagged in the idea. For each agent, capture:

  • name (slug), one-line purpose.
  • Tool surface: which builtins (query_table, insert_row, …), which functions (must exist in the Functions section), which MCP servers (URL + transport).
  • Visibility: private | authenticated | public. If public AND any write tool is reachable, mark safety_acknowledged_needed: true and set per-IP / per-user / per-app rate limits + daily_budget_usd.
  • Default model.
  • Note that the agent record will not be carried by clone replay — the spec JSON (under agents/<name>.json) rides along in the repo snapshot, so this matters for the publish stage too.
  • Frontend stack. "Frontend: ① Vite + React ② Next.js ③ static HTML ④ none (API-only)." Write to 00-state.md frontend_stack.

7b. Publish-as-template. Read publish_as_template from 00-state.md front-matter (set by journey-idea). If yes or unlisted, plan for it now:

  • README outline (one-liner, env-var-per-function list, OAuth setup, agent re-import, MCP server registration, seed data, first-run smoke).
  • Which env vars use the auto-mint convention (butterbase_api_key) vs. require manual user input on clone.
  • Whether agents/*.json files need to be exported and committed (yes if Agents section is non-empty).
  • Note that publishing requires butterbase repo push to upload the source tree as a snapshot — without it, cloners get an empty file tree.

Toolchain question

Ask: "Will your app's code use @butterbase/sdk only in the frontend, only server-side (functions, scripts), or both?" Record under Toolchain → SDK surfaces.

Ask: "Want to install @butterbase/cli for the local dev loop (logs, scaffolding, key rotation)? (yes/no — default yes)" Record under Toolchain → CLI usage.

  • Scope cut (hackathon mode). Re-read the must-haves list. For each, ask: "Ship now or post-hackathon?" Write the cut list into 02-plan.md's "Post-hackathon" section.
  • Annotate skipped stages. For every build stage NOT used in this plan (check the capability map and feature list), update 00-state.md's checklist to read - [ ] <stage> (n/a) for that row. Also do this for rls if hackathon_mode: true (mark as (folded into schema)).

10. Final approval. Show the user the assembled plan and ask: "Plan looks good? (yes / revise <section>)". Loop until yes.

02-plan.md format

# Plan

## Tables
- `users` (id uuid pk, email text unique, created_at timestamp)
- `orders` (id uuid pk, user_id uuid fk→users.id, status enum[pending,paid,shipped], total int, created_at timestamp; index on user_id)
- ...

## RLS
- `orders`: user-isolation (create_user_isolation, owner column = user_id)
- ...

## Auth
- Providers: Google
- Demo user: yes (email [email protected], password set via seed)

## Functions
- `stripe-webhook` — HTTP, idempotency table `_processed_events`
- `daily-digest` — cron 0 9 * * *  UTC

## Storage
- bucket: `avatars` (per-user, private; download via presigned URL)

## AI / RAG / realtime / durable
- (none)

## Agents
- `order-summariser` — purpose: summarise a user's recent orders on demand.
  - Tools: builtin `query_table`, function `format-currency`.
  - Visibility: authenticated. Rate: 60/hr per user. Daily budget: $5.
  - Default model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001.
  - Spec file: `agents/order-summariser.json` (committed to repo).
- (omit section entirely if no agents)

## Publish-as-template
- Intent: yes / unlisted / no
- README outline: <bullet list of sections>
- Env vars cloners must supply: <list per function>
- Auto-mint eligible keys: `butterbase_api_key` (etc.)
- Agent specs to bundle: `agents/*.json`
- Snapshot push: `butterbase repo push` at end of journey-templates.
- (omit section entirely if publish_as_template = no)

## Frontend
- Vite + React

## Toolchain

- **SDK surfaces**: <client-side only | server-side only | both>
  - Client-side: install `@butterbase/sdk` in the frontend; use `auth`, `db`, `storage`, `realtime`.
  - Server-side: install `@butterbase/sdk` in functions / scripts; use the service-key flow for elevated access.
- **CLI usage**: <yes / no>
  - Yes (default): use `butterbase` CLI for local scaffolding, log tailing (`butterbase logs <fn>`), function invocation, and key rotation.
- **Why both**: MCP tools provision and orchestrate; SDK + CLI are the runtime + dev loop.

## Build order
1. schema
2. rls (folded into schema in hackathon mode)
3. auth
4. storage
5. functions
6. ai          (if used)
7. rag         (if used)
8. realtime    (if used)
9. durable     (if used)
10. agents     (if used — must come after functions, ai, and any MCP-server setup)
11. frontend
12. deploy
13. templates (optional — only if publish_as_template != no)

## Post-hackathon
- email notifications (deferred)
- admin dashboard (deferred)

Outputs

  • Writes docs/butterbase/02-plan.md.
  • Updates 00-state.md: tick - [x] plan, set frontend_stack, set current_stage: preflight, annotate skipped build stages with (n/a).

Anti-patterns

  • ❌ Asking the user to design every table column without recommending defaults first.
  • ❌ Skipping the scope-cut section in hackathon mode.
  • ❌ Writing the plan only at the end — write as you go so progress survives a crash.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Hf Release Notes
by huggingface
vendor

Generate Hugging Face Hub (huggingface_hub) release notes from cached PR JSON files. Use when asked to draft release notes from PR files.

4k tokens
Earth2studio Discover
by NVIDIA
vendor

> Find Earth2Studio models, data sources, and examples for a weather/climate use case. Do NOT use for writing inference code, downloading data, or installation.

7k tokens
Earth2studio Install
by NVIDIA
vendor

> Guide installing Earth2Studio via uv or pip, selecting model extras, and configuring the environment. Do NOT use for writing inference code, choosing models, or PhysicsNeMo questions.

6k tokens
Natural Language
by dpearson2699

Tokenize, tag, and analyze natural language text using Apple's NaturalLanguage framework and translate between languages with the Translation framework. Use when adding language identification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, text embeddings, or in-app translation to iOS/macOS/visionOS apps.

7k tokens
Legal AI Model Router Stephane Boghossian
by lawve-ai

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

20k tokens
Regulatory Deal Card Generator Patrick Munro
by lawve-ai

Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.

15k tokens
Route Contract Drafting
by lawve-ai

> Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT DRAFTING — generating, redlining, or rewriting contract language from instructions. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Contract Drafting). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/ stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to draft this clause/agreement", "best AI for drafting contracts", "route this drafting task", or is about to generate/redline contract text and hasn't fixed a model.

3k tokens
Status Report Drafter Scott Margetts
by lawve-ai

Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.

11k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take butterbase-ai/journey-plan from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.