mcpbeat Sign in

Impl Review Agent Skill

'Implement review feedback on a PR. Checks out the branch, applies impl-review, implement review, implement review feedback, address review comments.'

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
3472
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/brave/brave-core --skill impl-review

The instruction itself

16 sections, as written by the author

Implement Review Feedback

Checkout a PR's branch, implement the reviewer's feedback, run preflight checks,

commit, and push.

Arguments

  • <pr-number> (required) — The PR number in brave/brave-core to implement

review feedback for.

Confirmation

Always ask for user confirmation before implementing changes, before

committing/pushing, and before posting comments on GitHub.

Steps

1. Parse Arguments

Extract the PR number from the arguments. It must be a numeric value. If no PR

number is provided, ask the user for one.

2. Fetch PR Details

gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo brave/brave-core --json headRefName,title,body,state,files,baseRefName

Extract:

  • Branch name (headRefName) — the branch to checkout
  • Title — for context
  • State — must be OPEN (abort if closed/merged)
  • Base branch — for understanding the diff context
  • Changed files — to understand what the PR modifies

If the PR is not open, inform the user and stop.

3. Fetch Review Comments

Fetch review data from the PR:

gh api repos/brave/brave-core/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/reviews --paginate
gh api repos/brave/brave-core/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments --paginate
gh api repos/brave/brave-core/issues/$PR_NUMBER/comments --paginate

This provides:

  • Reviews (approve/request changes/comment)
  • Inline code review comments (with file paths and line numbers)
  • Issue-level discussion comments

4. Analyze Review Feedback

Parse the review comments to understand what changes are requested:

  • Identify actionable feedback — Focus on explicit change requests from

reviewers. Ignore:

  • Approvals without change requests
  • Informational comments that don't require action
  • Comments that have already been addressed (check commit timestamps vs

comment timestamps)

Questions are not change requests. When a comment is phrased as a

question, answer the question first. Do not make code changes in response to

it unless the reviewer or requester explicitly asks for a change.

  • Categorize each requested change:
  • Which file(s) need modification
  • What specific change is requested
  • Whether it affects production code, test code, or both
  • Present the plan:
  • How many review comments were found
  • Which are actionable vs already addressed
  • Which comments are questions, the proposed answer for each one, and which

question comments (if any) also contain an explicit change request

  • What changes you plan to make for each
  • Ask for user confirmation before proceeding with implementation
  • Answer questions before implementation:
  • For question-only comments, post the answer immediately and do not make

code changes

  • If a question also contains an explicit change request (for example, "Could

you change X?"), post the answer first, then follow the normal

implementation confirmation flow for the requested change

5. Checkout the Branch

git fetch origin
git checkout <headRefName>
git pull origin <headRefName>

Ensure you're on the correct branch and up to date with the remote.

6. Implement Changes

CRITICAL: Only make changes the reviewer explicitly asks for.

  • Do NOT make any additional changes — no "while I'm here" cleanups, no extra

refactoring, no renaming things the reviewer didn't mention

  • If the reviewer asks you to fix one thing, fix exactly that one thing and

nothing else

  • Every extra change risks introducing issues and makes the reviewer's job

harder

  • Read the full source files for context before making changes (don't just look

at the diff)

  • Apply the same coding standards as the rest of the codebase

7. Run Preflight Checks

Invoke the preflight skill to validate all changes:

/preflight

This runs: best practices check, format, gn_check, presubmit, build, and

affected tests.

If preflight fails:

  • Fix the issues it identifies
  • Re-run preflight until it passes
  • All fixes should still be scoped to the review feedback (don't fix unrelated

issues)

8. Commit and Push

Before committing, show the user a summary of all changes (files modified, diff

stats) and ask for confirmation. If the user rejects, stop without committing.

ALWAYS create a NEW separate commit — never amend existing commits.

git add <changed-files>
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
Address review: <brief description of changes>
EOF
)"
git push

Commit message guidelines:

  • Start with "Address review:" prefix
  • Briefly describe what feedback was addressed
  • Keep under 72 characters for subject line
  • DO NOT include any Co-Authored-By line
  • DO NOT use --no-verify or --no-gpg-sign flags

If multiple logical units of review feedback were addressed, consider separate

commits for each.

9. Post PR Comment

Show the draft comment to the user and ask for confirmation before posting. If

the user rejects, skip posting.

If question answers were already posted before implementation, do not duplicate

them in the final summary comment; briefly reference that they were answered and

summarize only the implemented changes.

Post a summary comment on the PR:

gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --repo brave/brave-core --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
Fixed: <description of what was changed>

<For each review point addressed, briefly note what was done>
EOF
)"

10. Report Summary

Output a summary to the user:

  • PR number and title
  • Number of review comments addressed
  • What changes were made
  • Preflight result (pass/fail)
  • Commit SHA
  • Link to the PR

Important Rules

  • Questions first — Answer comments phrased as questions before taking

action; do not change code unless the reviewer or requester explicitly asks

  • Minimal changes — Only implement what reviewers explicitly ask for
  • New commits only — Never amend; separate commits let reviewers track what

changed

  • No attribution — No Co-Authored-By lines in commits
  • User confirmation — Present the plan before implementing, confirm before

committing, and confirm before posting summary comments; question answers do

not require confirmation

  • Preflight required — All changes must pass preflight before pushing

Example Usage

/impl-review 12345

Asks for confirmation before implementing, committing, and posting.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
MCP Builder
by anthropics
vendor ×13

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

30k tokens scripts
Changelog Generator
by frostant
×9

Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.

774 tokens
Finishing A Development Branch
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

1k tokens
MCP Builder
by JayZeeDesign
×7

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

37k tokens scripts
Vercel React Native Skills
by vercel-labs
vendor ×6

React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.

39k tokens
Vercel React Best Practices
by ratacat
×5

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

34k tokens
Next Best Practices
by vercel-labs
vendor ×4

Next.js best practices - file conventions, RSC boundaries, data patterns, async APIs, metadata, error handling, route handlers, image/font optimization, bundling

20k tokens
Using Git Worktrees
by ZhanlinCui
×4

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

1k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take brave/impl-review from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.