For an external contributor's open PRs to brave/brave-core, ensure the `sync-and-rebase-pr-from-fork.yml` workflow has been dispatched for each PR's latest commit SHA — so a `contributor-*` draft PR exists inside brave/brave-core and CI can run. Invoke when the user says something like "create contributor PRs for <user>", "sync contributor PRs <list>", "run the rebase-from-fork workflow for these PRs", or passes a GitHub username / list of PR URLs/numbers.
npx skills add https://github.com/brave/brave-core --skill create-contributor-prs
External contributors fork brave/brave-core and open PRs from their fork. Most
of Brave's CI doesn't run on fork PRs for security reasons. The
sync-and-rebase-pr-from-fork.yml workflow exists to create an in-org mirror
branch (contributor-<owner>-<headRefName>) and a draft PR in brave/brave-core
that re-triggers full CI on the rebased commit.
This skill dispatches that workflow for each open PR by a contributor (or each
PR in an explicit list), but only when a dispatch hasn't already happened for
the PR's current HEAD commit.
The user invokes this skill with one of:
create-contributor-prs jharris-tech. Resolveto all open PRs they authored against brave/brave-core.
https://github.com/brave/brave-core/pull/36402#36402 or 36402brave/brave-core#36402If the user gives both a username and PR list, treat them as additional filters
(union of both).
If no input is given, ask for one. Don't proceed without explicit scope.
Always brave/brave-core unless the user explicitly names a different repo.
Pass --repo brave/brave-core to every gh call. Don't assume the cwd matters.
.github/workflows/sync-and-rebase-pr-from-fork.yml inputs:
PR_NUMBER (optional) — number of the contributor PRCOMMIT_HASH (required, 40-char hex) — the contributor PR's HEAD commit SHAThe workflow:
isCrossRepository: true). It exits 1otherwise — so filter non-cross-repo PRs out client-side, don't dispatch them.
COMMIT_HASH from the contributor's fork, rebases ontothe PR's base branch, force-pushes to
refs/heads/contributor-<headRepositoryOwner>-<headRefName> inside
brave/brave-core.
CI run for contributor PR #<PR_NUMBER> if onedoesn't already exist for that contributor branch.
GitHub does NOT expose workflow_dispatch inputs via the runs API. To find out
which COMMIT_HASH a past run used, you must read the run's log.
For a username:
gh pr list --repo brave/brave-core --author <USER> --state open \
--json number,title,url,headRefOid,headRepositoryOwner,headRepository,isCrossRepository,headRefName \
--limit 100
For each user-supplied PR number N:
gh pr view N --repo brave/brave-core \
--json number,title,url,headRefOid,headRepositoryOwner,headRepository,isCrossRepository,headRefName,state,author
Combine into one list. Drop any PR where isCrossRepository == false (the
workflow rejects same-repo PRs) and report them as "skipped: not cross-repo".
Drop any PR not in OPEN state and report it as "skipped: not open".
For each PR, compare its headRefOid against the COMMIT_HASH inputs of recent
workflow runs.
Pull a window of recent runs once, up front (don't refetch per-PR):
gh run list --repo brave/brave-core \
--workflow=sync-and-rebase-pr-from-fork.yml \
--limit 100 \
--json databaseId,status,conclusion,createdAt,event
For each candidate run (filter to event == "workflow_dispatch"), the
COMMIT_HASH input appears in the job log on a line like
COMMIT_HASH: <40-hex>. Fetching the full log per run is slow, so batch-fetch
only as many as needed: iterate runs newest-first and stop early once every
target PR's HEAD SHA is either matched or determined absent in the window.
Per-run log fetch + extract:
gh run view <RUN_ID> --repo brave/brave-core --log 2>/dev/null \
| grep -oE 'COMMIT_HASH: [0-9a-f]{40}' \
| head -1 \
| awk '{print $2}'
Build a set dispatched_shas. Also record per-SHA whether the run is
in_progress / queued / completed (success or failure) — useful for
reporting.
If the run window of 100 doesn't cover far enough back (e.g. the contributor's
HEAD commit is older than the oldest run in the window), expand the window with
--limit 200 etc., or accept that you may re-dispatch. The workflow is
idempotent (force-push + skip-if-exists draft PR), so a duplicate dispatch is
wasteful CI but not destructive. Mention this tradeoff if you bail on the
lookback early.
For each PR whose headRefOid is NOT in dispatched_shas:
gh workflow run sync-and-rebase-pr-from-fork.yml \
--repo brave/brave-core \
-f PR_NUMBER=<N> \
-f COMMIT_HASH=<headRefOid>
gh workflow run returns nothing useful on success and exits non-zero on
failure. Capture stderr.
Do NOT pass --ref — let it default to the workflow's default branch (master).
The workflow operates on the input commit hash, not the ref.
Print a compact table per PR:
PR SHA Status
36402 3807075d already dispatched (in_progress, run 26407241424)
36510 abc1234d dispatched now
36588 9988aabb skipped: not cross-repo
36601 77665544 skipped: closed
End with a one-line summary: Dispatched N, already-running M, skipped K.
If any dispatch failed, list the PR + the stderr from gh workflow run.
Each dispatch consumes CI minutes and creates/updates a draft PR in the org.
Before triggering a batch dispatch, show the list of PRs you're about to
dispatch for and ask the user to confirm — unless they explicitly said "just do
it" / "no confirmation" / passed something like --yes. A single-PR dispatch
can proceed without re-confirming if the user clearly named that one PR.
display_title or head_sha of the workflow run to infer theCOMMIT_HASH input. head_sha is the SHA of master at dispatch time, not the
input. Only the log has the real input.
resolved.
workflow.
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
Next.js best practices - file conventions, RSC boundaries, data patterns, async APIs, metadata, error handling, route handlers, image/font optimization, bundling
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
Take brave/create-contributor-prs from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.