mcpbeat Sign in

Pr Review Expert Skill for Claude

> Systematic PR review with blast-radius analysis, security scanning, and breaking-change and test-coverage deltas. Use when reviewing PRs that touch shared libraries, APIs, database schemas, auth, or security-sensitive code.

15k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
7
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
447
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills --skill pr-review-expert

What comes with it

54 989 bytes besides the instruction
references/best-practices-and-troubleshooting.md
references/review-workflow-commands.md
references/writeup-format-and-checklist.md
scripts/blast_radius_calculator.py
scripts/diff_analyzer.py
scripts/review_checklist_generator.py

What it tells the agent to use

found in the instruction text
Grep reads your files

The instruction itself

7 sections, as written by the author

PR Review Expert

Structured, systematic code review for GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs. Goes beyond style nits to perform blast-radius analysis, security vulnerability scanning, breaking-change detection, test-coverage delta calculation, and performance impact assessment. Produces reviewer-ready reports with prioritized findings categorized as must-fix, should-fix, and suggestions.

Keywords: PR review, code review, pull request, merge request, blast radius, security scan, breaking changes, test coverage, review checklist, code quality

Core Capabilities

  • Blast radius analysis — trace which files, services, and downstream consumers a diff could break; quantify severity CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW.
  • Security scanning — detect SQL injection, XSS vectors, hardcoded secrets, auth bypass, insecure crypto, path traversal, and prototype pollution in the diff.
  • Breaking-change detection — flag API removals/renames, response-schema and required-field changes, DB column removals, env-var changes, and TS interface edits.
  • Test coverage analysis — new-code vs new-test ratio, missing tests for new public functions, deleted tests without deleted code, coverage delta.
  • Performance assessment — N+1 query patterns, bundle-size regressions, unbounded queries, missing indexes.
  • Reviewer-ready output — prioritized must-fix / should-fix / suggestion report, a 35-item checklist, and consistent comment labels.

When to Use

  • Before merging any PR that touches shared libraries, APIs, or database schemas.
  • When a PR is large (>200 lines changed) and needs structured review.
  • For PRs in security-sensitive code paths (auth, payments, PII handling).
  • After an incident, to proactively review similar code changes.
  • For onboarding new contributors whose PRs need thorough feedback.

Tools

| Tool | Purpose | Command |

|------|---------|---------|

| blast_radius_calculator.py | Calculate PR blast radius from import chains / dependency trees of changed files | git diff --name-only main...HEAD \| python scripts/blast_radius_calculator.py --root src |

| diff_analyzer.py | Analyze a diff for risk indicators (large files, sensitive paths, config/breaking/security patterns) | gh pr diff $PR \| python scripts/diff_analyzer.py --json |

| review_checklist_generator.py | Generate a tailored review checklist from changed file types/patterns | git diff --name-only main...HEAD \| python scripts/review_checklist_generator.py |

References

Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:

  • references/review-workflow-commands.md — the 6-step review workflow with the exact gh/grep command catalog for context gathering, blast radius, security scan, breaking-change detection, coverage delta, and performance impact (plus the blast-radius severity table and coverage rules). Read when actually performing a review.
  • references/writeup-format-and-checklist.md — the review report template with worked examples, the complete 35-item review checklist, and the comment-label taxonomy. Read when writing up findings.
  • references/best-practices-and-troubleshooting.md — common reviewer pitfalls, best-practice habits, the troubleshooting table, and the success-criteria bar. Read before and after a review for quality control.

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Structured review of GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs using a 35+ item checklist
  • Blast radius analysis for monorepo and multi-service architectures
  • Static security scanning of diffs for common vulnerability patterns (SQLi, XSS, secrets, auth bypass)
  • Breaking change detection for APIs, database schemas, TypeScript interfaces, and environment variables

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Automated code fixes or refactoring — use engineering/saas-scaffolder or engineering/migration-architect for code generation
  • Runtime security analysis, SAST/DAST tool orchestration, or CVE database lookups — use engineering/dependency-auditor for dependency-level vulnerability scanning
  • CI/CD pipeline configuration or build failure triage — use engineering/ci-cd-pipeline-builder for pipeline design
  • Performance benchmarking or load testing — use engineering/performance-profiler for profiling and optimization guidance

Integration Points

| Skill | Integration | Data Flow |

|-------|-------------|-----------|

| engineering/dependency-auditor | Run dependency audit before reviewing PRs that add or upgrade packages | Audit report feeds into the Security section of the review report |

| engineering/ci-cd-pipeline-builder | Embed review checklist gates into CI pipelines as automated PR checks | Checklist items become pass/fail signals in the pipeline |

| engineering/performance-profiler | Escalate N+1 and unbounded query findings for detailed profiling | Flagged code paths from review become profiling targets |

| engineering/migration-architect | Validate database migration safety for PRs that include schema changes | Migration risk assessment supplements the Breaking Changes section |

| engineering/release-manager | Feed breaking change detection results into release notes and changelogs | Detected breaking changes auto-populate release documentation |

| engineering/api-design-reviewer | Cross-reference API endpoint changes with API design standards | API review findings merge into the Blast Radius and Breaking Changes sections |

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Receiving Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

2k tokens
Requesting Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×6

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

2k tokens
Git Commit
by github
vendor ×3

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

799 tokens
Github Code Review
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

13k tokens
Karpathy Guidelines
by hyyhf
×3

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

629 tokens
Code Reviewer
by google-gemini
vendor ×2

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

795 tokens
Agent MD Refactor
by softaworks
×2

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

4k tokens
Commit Work
by softaworks
×2

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

2k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take borghei/pr-review-expert from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.