mcpbeat Sign in

API Design Reviewer Skill for Claude

> Review REST API designs for quality, consistency, and breaking changes. Lints OpenAPI specs, generates scorecards, and detects breaking changes between versions. Use when designing APIs, reviewing contracts, or managing API versioning.

50k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
8
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
447
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills --skill api-design-reviewer

What comes with it

194 850 bytes besides the instruction
references/api_antipatterns.md
references/rest-design-patterns.md
references/rest_design_rules.md
references/tooling-ci-and-troubleshooting.md
scripts/api_linter.py
scripts/api_scorecard.py
scripts/breaking_change_detector.py

The instruction itself

8 sections, as written by the author

API Design Reviewer

Comprehensive analysis and review of REST API designs against conventions, best practices, and industry standards. Helps engineering teams build consistent, maintainable, well-designed APIs through automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards.

Core Capabilities

  • API linting & convention analysis — resource naming (kebab-case URLs, camelCase fields), HTTP method usage, URL structure, status-code compliance, error-format consistency, and documentation coverage.
  • Breaking change detection — endpoint removal, response-shape changes, field removal/rename, type changes, new required fields, and status-code changes between two spec versions, with migration guides.
  • API design scoring — weighted scorecard across Consistency (30%), Documentation (20%), Security (20%), Usability (15%), and Performance (15%), with letter grades A–F and recommendations.

When to Use

  • Designing a new REST API or reviewing an API contract.
  • Validating an OpenAPI/Swagger spec against REST conventions.
  • Managing API versioning and detecting breaking changes between releases.
  • Gating deployments on API design quality in CI.

Clarify First

Before producing the review, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • [ ] Which output — lint report, design scorecard, or breaking-change detection (selects api_linter.py, api_scorecard.py, or breaking_change_detector.py)
  • [ ] Spec file(s) — the OpenAPI/Swagger JSON, or the two versions to diff (the input the tools parse)
  • [ ] Quality bar / CI gate — minimum grade or fail-on-breaking (sets --min-grade / --exit-on-breaking and how strict the verdict is)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.

Tools

| Tool | Purpose | Command |

|------|---------|---------|

| api_linter.py | Lint an OpenAPI/Swagger JSON spec for REST conventions and best practices | python scripts/api_linter.py openapi.json --format json |

| breaking_change_detector.py | Detect breaking changes between two spec versions (with migration guides) | python scripts/breaking_change_detector.py v1.json v2.json --exit-on-breaking |

| api_scorecard.py | Score API design quality across 5 weighted dimensions (A–F grades) | python scripts/api_scorecard.py openapi.json --min-grade B |

References

Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:

  • references/rest-design-patterns.md — REST naming/method/URL principles, versioning strategies, pagination patterns, error formats and status codes, auth/RBAC patterns, rate limiting, HATEOAS, idempotency, backward-compatibility rules, OpenAPI validation, performance, and security best practices. Read when designing or reviewing endpoints.
  • references/tooling-ci-and-troubleshooting.md — the three tools' features, CI/CD and pre-commit integration, best-practices and anti-pattern checklists, troubleshooting table, success criteria, and full CLI flag references. Read when wiring tools into pipelines or debugging.
  • references/rest_design_rules.md — detailed REST design rules reference (resources vs actions, HTTP method semantics with worked examples). Read for an in-depth rules catalog.
  • references/api_antipatterns.md — common API anti-patterns (verb-based URLs / RPC trap and more) with bad/good examples and recommended fixes. Read when auditing an existing API for design smells.

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Linting OpenAPI 3.x and Swagger 2.0 JSON specifications against REST conventions
  • Detecting breaking, potentially-breaking, and non-breaking changes between two spec versions
  • Scoring API design quality across consistency, documentation, security, usability, and performance
  • Generating actionable migration guides when breaking changes are found

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Runtime API testing, load testing, or contract testing (see api-test-suite-builder)
  • GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket API design review
  • Auto-generation of OpenAPI specs from code or server stubs
  • Authentication flow implementation or OAuth server configuration (see senior-security in engineering/)

Integration Points

| Skill | Integration | Data Flow |

|-------|-------------|-----------|

| engineering/api-test-suite-builder | Generate test cases from linter findings | Linter issues feed into test plan priorities for endpoint validation |

| engineering/changelog-generator | Document breaking changes in release notes | Breaking change detector output provides structured change data for changelogs |

| engineering/ci-cd-pipeline-builder | Gate deployments on API quality | Scorecard grade and linter exit codes integrate as pipeline quality gates |

| engineering/senior-backend | Review API implementation against design | Scorecard recommendations guide backend refactoring decisions |

| engineering/code-reviewer | Enrich PR reviews with API analysis | Linter and breaking change reports attach to PR review comments |

| engineering/release-manager | Validate version bumps match change severity | Breaking change detector severity levels inform semver version decisions |

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Git Commit
by github
vendor ×3

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

799 tokens
Github Code Review
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

13k tokens
Commit Work
by softaworks
×2

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

2k tokens
Verification & Quality Assurance
by Microck
×2

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

4k tokens
Gh CLI
by christophacham
×2

GitHub CLI (gh) comprehensive reference for repositories, issues, pull requests, Actions, projects, releases, gists, codespaces, organizations, extensions, and all GitHub operations from the command line.

10k tokens
Github
by Dicklesworthstone
×2

GitHub CLI - manage repositories, issues, pull requests, actions, releases, and more from the command line.

1k tokens
Codebase Cleanup Refactor Clean
by ComeOnOliver
×2

You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.

9k tokens
Codebase Cleanup Tech Debt
by ComeOnOliver
×2

You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create acti

6k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take borghei/api-design-reviewer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.