mcpbeat Sign in

Twg Responsibility Routing Agent Skill

> Use with root `twg` to route owners, subject-matter experts, maintainers, reviewers, approvers, decision authorities, Heads of Engineering, or escalation paths for a topic, area, ask, project, service, or component.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
3
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
8
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/atlassian/twg-cli --skill twg-responsibility-routing

What comes with it

1 768 bytes besides the instruction
LICENSE.txt
agents/openai.yaml

The instruction itself

6 sections, as written by the author

twg-responsibility-routing

Use the root twg skill. Use this workflow to answer “who should I involve,

why them, and in what role?” Do not assume a broad topic is an exact product.

CLI launcher fallback

Run twg <command>. On shell command not found, use $HOME/.local/bin/twg

(macOS/Linux) / $env:LOCALAPPDATA\Programs\twg\bin\twg.exe (PowerShell), then

tell user to add that directory to PATH. Do not treat auth or command errors as

PATH failures.

Classify The Role

Keep these roles distinct:

  • Declared owner: formally accountable for an entity or area.
  • Operational owner or maintainer: responsible for current delivery or operation.
  • Expert: has source-backed depth in one workstream.
  • Reviewer or consulted party: evaluates or advises but may not decide.
  • Approver or decision authority: can authorize the specific ask or decision.
  • Escalation or Head of Engineering contact: leads the responsible engineering

organization or can route an unresolved ask.

  • Informed stakeholder: affected by the decision but not responsible for it.

Resolve Scope Before People

For a fuzzy topic or area, compare one bounded

twg search "<topic>" --app confluence pass with one bounded

twg work search "<topic>" pass. Group same-named results into distinct

initiative, platform, domain, feature, and team clusters. Hydrate 2-5 central

charters, roadmaps, services, projects, or active workstreams before ranking

people. If the sources disagree, show the alternative scopes or ask the user.

For a stable project, goal, component, service, work item, page, or repository,

use that reference directly.

Find Responsibility And Authority

  • Use twg responsibility get <reference> for declared owners, teams,

maintainers, approvers, reviewers, or escalation roles.

  • Use twg responsibility infer <reference> only when declared responsibility

is missing or the user asks for evidence-based candidates. Preserve confidence,

reason codes, evidence window, and declared-versus-observed status.

  • Infer primarily from scoped search, declared roles, and hydrated work evidence.

Org data is optional; do not block or weaken the workflow merely because it is

unavailable.

  • When org data is connected and a candidate leader or manager is known, prefer

the narrowest useful tree: org-tree for hierarchy, work-tree for

cross-surface breadth, workitem-tree for Jira work, or pr-tree for PR

authorship/review. Tree counts help validate reach and organizational scope;

they do not by themselves prove expertise, ownership, or approval authority.

  • For an approval ask, inspect the artifact that defines the decision: project or

goal ownership, Jira workflow/approver fields, charter, decision record, or

accountable team. State separately who can recommend, who must be consulted,

and who can approve. Never promote an active contributor into an approver.

  • For escalation, give the nearest verified owner first. Add the engineering

leader only when the owner is missing, blocked, cross-team, or the ask needs

organizational authority.

Use twg-context-discovery only when relationship or dependency expansion is

needed after the scope and people roles are established. It is not the default

route for a responsibility question.

Evidence And Output

Strong evidence includes explicit ownership, accountable roles, workflow

authority, charter/roadmap leadership, service ownership, sustained decisions,

or repeated central contributions. Profile text, org proximity, one document,

raw activity, or a self-authored update is weak evidence by itself.

For topic/SME maps, return at most five workstreams and one primary expert per

workstream unless the user asks for more. Name an overall owner only with

cross-workstream evidence. For approval or escalation asks, return the proposed

contact, role, scope, evidence, confidence, why they are appropriate, and a

suggested question or reach-out. State when authority is unconfirmed.

Stop when another search would not change scope, role, authority, escalation,

confidence, or the recommended contact.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Doc Coauthoring
by anthropics
vendor ×10

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

4k tokens
File Organizer
by frostant
×10

Intelligently organizes your files and folders across your computer by understanding context, finding duplicates, suggesting better structures, and automating cleanup tasks. Reduces cognitive load and keeps your digital workspace tidy without manual effort.

3k tokens
Domain Name Brainstormer
by frostant
×8

Generates creative domain name ideas for your project and checks availability across multiple TLDs (.com, .io, .dev, .ai, etc.). Saves hours of brainstorming and manual checking.

1k tokens
Brainstorming
by ZhanlinCui
×4

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

626 tokens
Planning With Files
by ZhanlinCui
×3

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.

9k tokens scripts
Scientific Brainstorming
by christophacham
×3

Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.

5k tokens
GitHub Project Management
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning

14k tokens
Grill Me
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

3k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take atlassian/twg-responsibility-routing from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.