Performance Review Skill for Claude

Table of Contents

• Quick Start
• When to Use
• When NOT to Use
• Required TodoWrite Items
• Workflow
• Tiered Analysis
• Output Format
• Cross-Plugin Dependencies
• Supporting Modules

Performance Review

Static-analysis review of time and space complexity hotspots.

The skill runs in three escalating tiers. Tier 1 uses Python's

stdlib ast and always runs. Tier 2 uses gauntlet's tree-sitter

parser to extend detection across languages when gauntlet is

installed. Tier 3 uses the gauntlet code graph to upgrade

severity when hotspots reach other hotspots transitively. If

gauntlet is missing, Tiers 2 and 3 no-op and Tier 1 still

produces useful findings on Python source.

Quick Start

/performance-review                  # scan changed files
/performance-review path/to/file.py  # scan one file
/performance-review --tier 1         # force Tier 1 only

Programmatic use:

from pensive.skills.performance_review import PerformanceReviewSkill
skill = PerformanceReviewSkill()
result = skill.analyze(context, "src/module.py")
for f in result.issues:
    print(f"[{f.severity}] {f.file}:{f.line} {f.message}")

When To Use

• Pre-merge review of code that runs on user-scaled inputs.
• Triage of a function that "feels slow" before reaching for a

profiler.

• Audit a refactor for newly introduced O(n²) patterns.
• Guardrail for AI-generated code where nested-loop hot spots

are common.

When NOT to Use

• The target needs runtime measurement (memory profile, CPU

time on real data). Use Skill(parseltongue:python-performance)

instead: that skill drives cProfile, py-spy, and benchmarks.

• General refactoring guidance not focused on hotspots: use

Skill(pensive:code-refinement) whose algorithm-efficiency

module covers broader optimization patterns. This skill

detects; that skill teaches.

• Deciding whether a hand-rolled loop transform (unrolling, manual

SIMD, strength reduction) is worth keeping: use

Skill(leyline:loop-optimization) for the hand-vs-compiler rule.

This skill flags hotspot shapes, not transformation choices.

• Architecture-level performance (sharding, caching layers,

queue placement): use Skill(pensive:architecture-review).

Required TodoWrite Items

• perf-review:context-established
• perf-review:scan-complete
• perf-review:findings-categorized
• perf-review:integration-checked
• perf-review:report-generated
• perf-review:findings-verified

Workflow

Step 1: Context (perf-review:context-established)

• Identify target files. If invoked with no argument, use

git diff --name-only. If invoked with a path, scope to that.

• Note language(s) involved. Tier 1 covers Python; non-Python

files need gauntlet for Tier 2 coverage.

Step 2: Tier 1 AST scan (perf-review:scan-complete)

Load modules/time-complexity.md for the time-side patterns and

modules/space-complexity.md for space-side. Each module

documents the AST shape of every detector.

Alongside the automated scan, load

modules/memory-allocation-lenses.md and apply its three

manual lenses (unbounded external-source collections, hot-path

recompute, serial blocking I/O) by reading the target files.

For each Python target file, call:

from pensive.skills.performance_review import PerformanceReviewSkill
result = PerformanceReviewSkill().analyze(context, path)

The visitor walks the AST once and emits ReviewFinding records.

Step 3: Categorize and rank (perf-review:findings-categorized)

Group findings by severity:

• HIGH: O(n²) or worse on input-sized iterables (T1, T2).
• MEDIUM: Unbounded allocation or per-iteration overhead

(T3, T4, S1, S3).

• LOW: Style-level inefficiencies (T5, T6, S2).
• CRITICAL: Reserved for Tier-3 transitive upgrades.

Within a severity, sort by file then line. Suppress findings

the user has explicitly marked acceptable (TODO/comment

markers) at module-load time of the target.

Step 4: Tier 2/3 enrichment (perf-review:integration-checked)

Load modules/gauntlet-integration.md for the contract.

If gauntlet is installed, run Tier 2 on non-Python files that

were skipped at Step 2. If a .gauntlet/graph.db exists in the

working tree, run Tier 3 to upgrade severities based on

transitive hotspot reachability.

If gauntlet is missing, this step is a no-op and the report

notes "Tier 2/3 not available: install gauntlet for

multi-language and call-chain coverage."

Step 5: Report (perf-review:report-generated)

Emit a markdown report:

## Performance Review: <target>

### HIGH (<count>)
- src/foo.py:42: Nested loop over the same iterable 'items'.
  Suggestion: sort + two pointers, or hash-set membership.

### MEDIUM (<count>)
- ...

### LOW (<count>)
- ...

Tier coverage: 1 (always) | 2 (gauntlet ✓/✗) | 3 (graph ✓/✗)

The report is informational. Apply fixes via

Skill(pensive:code-refinement) or hand-merge.

Tiered Analysis

| Tier | Source | When it runs | What it covers |

|------|--------|--------------|----------------|

| 1 | stdlib ast | Always (Python source only) | T1-T6, S1-S3 |

| 2 | gauntlet.treesitter_parser | When gauntlet importable | Same patterns adapted to JS/TS, Go, Rust, Java, C/C++ |

| 3 | gauntlet.graph.GraphStore | When .gauntlet/graph.db exists | Severity upgrade via transitive call chains |

Output Format

Findings use the shared ReviewFinding dataclass from

pensive.skills.base:

ReviewFinding(
    file="src/module.py",
    line=42,
    severity="HIGH",          # LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH | CRITICAL
    category="time",          # time | space
    message="Nested loop over the same iterable 'items'.",
    suggestion="Sort + two pointers, or hash-set membership.",
    anchor="verbatim source text at file:line",
    code_snippet="",
)

This shape matches every other pensive review skill, so the

findings can flow into Skill(pensive:unified-review) without

translation.

Cross-Plugin Dependencies

| Dependency | Required? | Effect when missing |

|------------|-----------|---------------------|

| gauntlet.treesitter_parser | Optional | Tier 2 returns []; Python coverage unchanged |

| gauntlet.graph.GraphStore | Optional | Tier 3 returns []; severities are not upgraded |

The optional-import contract follows the precedent in

plugins/leyline/src/leyline/tokens.py:25-32 and

plugins/gauntlet/hooks/pr_blast_radius.py:52-56: try-import

to module-level sentinels, then early-return on None inside

each tier helper. See modules/gauntlet-integration.md for the

exact code shape.

Supporting Modules

• modules/time-complexity.md: T1-T6 detector patterns and AST

shapes.

• modules/space-complexity.md: S1-S3 detector patterns.
• modules/gauntlet-integration.md: Tier 2/3 contract,

fallback semantics, examples.

• modules/kuva-visualization.md: Rendering benchmark data as

charts with kuva (criterion, pytest-benchmark, ad-hoc tables).

Covers when chart evidence satisfies proof-of-work requirements.

• modules/memory-allocation-lenses.md: Manual review lenses

(not AST detectors) for unbounded collections fed from

external sources, hot-path recompute that should be memoized,

and serial blocking I/O over unbounded sets. Apply by reading

the code; the detector-test rule in Testing does not cover

these because nothing is automated.

Verification

A perf-review finding is only useful if the caller can confirm it

is real. Use this checklist before treating any finding as worth

fixing:

• Reproduce under a profiler. Run cProfile, py-spy, or the

language-specific equivalent on the hotspot. The findings

pinpoint AST shapes; the profiler validates the runtime impact.

• Re-run the failing benchmark. If benches/ exists, the

hotspot should show up in numbers, not just AST scans.

• Compare numbers before and after the proposed fix. The fix

is wrong if numbers do not move. Capture both timings as

evidence references like [E1] (before) and [E2] (after).

When 3+ data points exist, render a kuva chart and attach it

to the PR (see modules/kuva-visualization.md).

• Sample two or three reported hotspots manually. Findings can

be true at the AST level and false at the call-graph level

when callers short-circuit. Manual sampling catches that.

The Skill(imbue:proof-of-work) discipline applies: claims like

"the hotspot is fixed" require evidence, not assertion.

Testing

A test file already lives at

plugins/pensive/tests/skills/test_performance_review.py covering

the AST-shape detectors. Two rules for changes here:

• Add a new detector with a test. Any new T-* or S-* pattern

added to the modules ships with a test that has the smallest

AST sample exercising it.

• Add a regression test for any false positive removed. When

the skill stops firing on a shape that used to look hot, the

reason should appear as a test case so the regression is

discoverable later.

The Iron Law applies: a new detector without a failing test first

is a request to skip TDD on a code-analysis component, which is

exactly the place where TDD pays off most.

Verify Findings Are Grounded (perf-review:findings-verified)

Every finding must cite a real location and a verbatim anchor. Write

findings to .review/findings.json and confirm each citation resolves:

python plugins/imbue/scripts/citation_verifier.py \
  --findings .review/findings.json --repo-root .

Drop or label UNVERIFIED any finding the verifier fails (exit 1); only

verified findings enter the report. See Skill(imbue:review-core) Step 5

and Skill(imbue:structured-output) for the schema.

Exit Criteria

• [ ] A perf-review report file exists for the requested target.
• [ ] Every finding carries a severity label and a concrete

suggestion the caller can act on.

• [ ] Time-complexity (T1-T6) and space-complexity (S1-S3)

detectors have been run; tier coverage is reported.

• [ ] Tier 2 (gauntlet treesitter) and Tier 3 (graph store)

contracts honor the optional-import sentinel: missing

modules return [] rather than raising.

• [ ] Each new detector ships with a smallest-AST test that

fails before the detector exists; each removed false

positive ships with a regression test.

• [ ] Findings flow into Skill(pensive:unified-review) without

translation when invoked from the unified entry point.

• [ ] Every reported finding carries a Location + verbatim Anchor

confirmed by citation_verifier.py (exit 0), or unverified

findings were dropped or labeled UNVERIFIED