Deferred Capture Skill for Claude

Deferred Capture Contract

When To Use

• Building a new plugin deferred-capture wrapper
• Validating an existing wrapper against the contract
• Adding new source labels or template fields

When NOT To Use

• Capturing a deferred item at runtime (use the plugin

wrapper directly, e.g. scripts/deferred_capture.py)

• Creating GitHub issues manually

Specification that all plugin deferred-capture wrappers implement.

Not a runtime dependency, just a convention.

CLI Interface

Required arguments:

• --title (str): Concise description. Becomes issue title

after [Deferred] prefix

• --source (str): Origin skill. One of: war-room, brainstorm,

scope-guard, feature-review, review, regression, egregore

• --context (str): Why raised and why deferred

Optional arguments:

• --labels (str): Comma-separated additional labels beyond

deferred and source

• --session-id (str): Session ID. Canonical source:

session_id from the hook payload stdin

(jq -r '.session_id'), fallback: UTC timestamp

YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS

• --artifact-path (str): Absolute path or $HOME-based

path to source artifact

• --captured-by (str): explicit (default) or safety-net
• --dry-run (flag): Print JSON output without creating issue

Issue Template

Title: [Deferred] <title>

Labels: deferred and <source>

Body:

Deferred Item

Source: <source> (session <session-id>)

Captured: <YYYY-MM-DD>

Branch: <current git branch>

Captured by: <explicit|safety-net>

Context

<context argument verbatim>

Original Artifact

<artifact-path if provided, otherwise "N/A">

Next Steps

• [ ] Evaluate feasibility in a future cycle
• [ ] Link to related work if applicable

Label Taxonomy

| Label | Color | Purpose |

|-------|-------|---------|

| deferred | #7B61FF | Universal query handle |

| war-room | #B60205 | Source: war-room deliberation |

| brainstorm | #1D76DB | Source: brainstorming session |

| scope-guard | #FBCA04 | Source: scope-guard deferral |

| feature-review | #F9A825 | Source: feature-review |

| review | #0E8A16 | Source: code/PR review |

| regression | #D73A4A | Source: skill regression |

| egregore | #5319E7 | Source: autonomous agent |

Duplicate Detection

Search: `gh issue list --search "<title> in:title"

--state open --json number,title`

Compare: exact title match after stripping [Deferred]

prefix and normalizing to lowercase.

Only open issues are checked. Re-filing a closed deferred

item is intentional.

Output (JSON to stdout)

Created: {"status": "created", "issue_url": "...", "number": 42}

Duplicate: {"status": "duplicate", "existing_url": "...", "number": 17}

Error: {"status": "error", "message": "..."}

Compliance Test

Any wrapper can verify conformance with:

python3 scripts/deferred_capture.py \

--title "Test: compliance check" \

--source test \

--context "Automated compliance verification" \

--dry-run

Must output valid JSON with a status field.

Exit Criteria

• [ ] Compliance test passes: deferred_capture.py --dry-run outputs

valid JSON with a status field (created, duplicate, or

error) for any conformant wrapper

• [ ] Created issues have title prefixed [Deferred], carry both

the deferred label and the source label, and body matches the

required template (Source, Captured, Branch, Captured by,

Context, Original Artifact, Next Steps)

• [ ] Duplicate detection runs before creation: `gh issue list

--search "<title> in:title"` called and exact match (after

stripping prefix and lowercasing) suppresses the new issue

• [ ] JSON written to stdout on every invocation; `{"status":

"created", "issue_url": "...", "number": N}` on success,

{"status": "duplicate", ...} on duplicate, `{"status":

"error", "message": "..."}` on failure