aperivue/present-paper
> Academic presentation preparation — paper-driven (journal club, grand rounds, seminar) and lecture/teaching decks (course material, workshop slides, conference talks). Analyzes source material, finds supporting references, drafts audience-adapted speaker scripts, generates or augments PPTX with speaker notes, and prepares Q&A.
npx skills add https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill present-paper
Prepare a polished academic presentation from a research paper. The skill walks through a 5-phase
pipeline: paper analysis, supporting research, script writing, slide note injection, and Q&A
preparation.
Use it when:
Three of these are read now, in full — they change what you produce. The rest are read **when the
answer to Q0 tells you which one you need**, because a talk has one venue and one style, and reading
the others costs roughly seven thousand tokens to learn nothing you will use.
Read now (always):
A. references/ai_slide_tells.md — the marks a generated deck leaves. Read all of it, first.
The complaint about AI decks is not that they are ugly — templates solved ugly. It is that they
*stop communicating*, because they were built to make the maker comfortable rather than to serve the
audience. This file is why the deck does not need catching later; scripts/check_slide_tells.py
catches it after (Step 3.6). It overrules older guidance where they conflict — in particular the
eyebrow-on-every-slide and brand-footer rules this project used to mandate, which are the single
most-cited visual tell.
B. references/presentation_archetypes.md — the skeleton, chosen by where the speaker is
standing: conference oral, journal-club critique, case-anchored grand rounds, didactic lecture,
defence, keynote (Duarte's sparkline, the Jobs STAR moment, Takahashi/Lessig), lay talk, decision
brief (Minto's pyramid, action titles, Kawasaki's 10/20/30). A deck has two independent choices
and conflating them is why talks fail: the *archetype* is what the talk has to do; the *visual
style* is what it looks like. A conference oral in a keynote's skeleton dies (no data on the
slides); a keynote in a conference oral's skeleton dies harder. **The skin is a preference; the
skeleton is not.** Its mechanical half is scripts/check_deck_budget.py.
C. references/presentation_design_guidelines.md — the enforceable rules (assertion headlines,
24-pt floor, negative space, ≤3 colours, colourblind-safe palettes, redraw-don't-screenshot,
animation discipline) plus the G1–G10 self-check the Phase 3.5 critic scores against.
Read on demand — after Q0/Q2 tell you which one:
| File | Read it when | Cost if read blindly |
|---|---|---|
| references/medical_presentation_templates.md | the venue is one of the five medical ones — then read that section only | ~3,700 tokens, of which you use a fifth |
| references/slide_visual_styles/CATALOG.md → one style file | Q2 has chosen a style | ~2,300 tokens per style |
| references/slide_design_principles.md | you are stuck on *why* a slide is not landing — Reynolds / Duarte / Knaflic / Tufte, the theory under the rules in C | ~2,600 tokens of theory you mostly already applied |
These mirror the entry-point pattern used in
make-figures/references/design_principles.md (Step 1 "Specify"). Both skills share
the same Reynolds / Knaflic / Tufte foundations — slide-level (this skill) and
figure-level (make-figures) are companions, not duplicates.
Before starting, collect these from the user:
| Input | Why |
|-------|-----|
| Paper | PDF path, DOI, or PMID |
| Presentation time | Determines depth and slide count |
| Target audience | Specialty mix, knowledge level — controls terminology depth |
| Context | Course name, conference, journal club format, prior session topics |
| Template / visual style | Institutional template (.pptx/.potx) to fill, or a visual style to generate in. Default: ask (Step 0b) |
| Extension section | Optional topic to include (e.g., AI directions, clinical implications). Default: none |
After collecting the inputs above and before drafting the outline, settle how the
deck will look. Ask the user two questions (use AskUserQuestion; skip a question if the
user already answered it in their request):
Q0 — "Where are you standing, and for how long?" (venue + minutes)
This decides the archetype — the skeleton — before any question about looks. Map the answer with
the selector table in references/presentation_archetypes.md, and carry archetype + minutes
forward: Step 3.6 checks the built deck against them. A 40-word slide is an ordinary academic slide
and a catastrophic keynote slide; there is no universal answer to "how much text is too much", only
an answer for *this room*.
If the user gives only a topic and no venue, ask. Do not guess: a deck built for no particular
room comes out generic in exactly the way every reviewer can see.
Q1 — "Do you have an institutional or branded template to use?"
.pptx/.potx. Switch to Mode C (Phase 3, "Fill aninstitutional template"): run scripts/inspect_pptx_template.py <file> to list its
layouts/placeholders/theme, then fill by placeholder index, preserving the master and
logo. See references/slide_visual_styles/institutional_brand.md. Do not also ask
Q2 — the template's theme *is* the style.
Q2 — "Which visual style should I generate in?" Offer the CATALOG.md menu with a
one-line preview each (make the recommended option first and label it):
| Option | One-line preview |
|--------|------------------|
| Nature / Lancet *(recommended for medical academic talks)* | White, navy + coral accent, hairline dividers, Inter/Pretendard — restrained editorial-academic |
| Clinical Blue | White/light-blue, navy-teal, calm and trustworthy, colorblind-safe — grand rounds / CME |
| Editorial Mono | High-contrast black-on-white, oversized type, one accent — single big-message keynote |
| Dark Modern | Deep-slate background, off-white text, electric accent — AI / method / tech talks |
| Other | Describe a palette/feel, or name a journal/brand to emulate |
Record the choice; pass the matching style spec to Phase 3. If the user has no
preference and the talk is a medical academic talk, default to Nature / Lancet
(~/.claude/rules/academic-lecture-style.md). Style choice does not change the outline,
script, or Q&A — only Phase 3 rendering.
Read the paper and produce a structured analysis:
## Paper Analysis
### Citation
[Full citation with DOI]
### Background
- What gap does this paper address?
- What was known vs. unknown before this study?
### Study Design
- Type: [RCT / cohort / case series / meta-analysis / etc.]
- Subjects: [n, inclusion/exclusion]
- Methods: [key methodological choices]
- Primary outcome: [what was measured]
### Key Results
1. [Finding 1 with effect size and CI/p-value]
2. [Finding 2]
3. [Finding 3]
### Patient/Case Summary Table
[If applicable — structured table of individual cases or subgroups]
### Limitations
1. [Limitation 1]
2. [Limitation 2]
### Significance
- Why does this matter?
- What changes because of this paper?
Create a slide-by-slide outline with time allocation:
## Slide Outline ([N] slides, [M] minutes)
| # | Title | Time | Key Content |
|---|-------|------|-------------|
| 1 | Title slide | 0:30 | Paper citation, presenter |
| 2 | Context / Prior sessions | 1:00 | How this connects to prior knowledge |
| 3 | Background | 1:30 | The gap this paper fills |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| N | Take-home messages | 0:30 | 3-5 key points |
Gate: User approves outline before proceeding.
Find references that strengthen the presentation:
Efficiency rule: Limit supporting references to 5-8 total. Only search categories
that the approved outline (Phase 0) actually requires. Skip categories not needed for
the presentation type (e.g., skip clinical trials for a methods-focused paper).
Do NOT summarize every paper found. Extract only:
## Verified References
### Main Paper
1. [Citation] — PMID: XXXXX, DOI: XX.XXXX/XXXXX
### Supporting References
2. [Citation] — PMID: XXXXX
→ Used for: [specific data point or context]
3. [Citation] — PMID: XXXXX
→ Used for: [specific data point or context]
### Key Data for Slides
- [Statistic 1]: [value] — Source: [Ref #]
- [Statistic 2]: [value] — Source: [Ref #]
Every reference must have a verified DOI or PMID. Mark unverified references with [UNVERIFIED].
Draft a complete speaker script with these requirements:
## Speaker Script
### Slide 1: Title (0:30)
"[Opening — introduce yourself and the paper]"
### Slide 2: Context (1:00)
"[Connect to prior knowledge or clinical relevance]"
...
### Slide N: Take-home Messages (0:30)
"[Summarize 3-5 key points. Thank audience. Invite questions.]"
Only include if user requested in Phase 0. Examples:
Gate: User reviews script before proceeding.
Mode A = generate a new deck in a chosen visual style. Mode B = add notes to an
existing deck. Mode C = fill the user's institutional/branded template (chosen at
Step 0b). Pick the mode from the Step 0b answer.
Mode A: Generate new slide deck
Generate a fully-editable PPTX from structured inline data using python-pptx. Two
canonical template libraries:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/generate_pptx_templates.py — generic T_lead /T_text / T_table / T_image_right / etc. templates with smoke-tested main(). Use
for journal club, grand rounds, conference talk, and short paper talks.
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/templates/build_pptx_nature_lancet.py — Nature/Lancet visualstyle (white + navy + coral, Inter/Pretendard, 47-slide academic lecture proven).
Use for academic lecture multi-paper survey (template #5). Functions:
new_presentation, add_title_slide, add_toc_slide, add_section_divider,
add_transition_slide, add_content_slide, add_glossary_slide,
add_closing_slide, plus fix_app_xml() helper. Style spec:
references/slide_visual_styles/nature_lancet.md.
For lecture decks pulling figures from PDFs (rather than from /make-figures
output), use ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/extract_pdf_figures.py — pdftoppm + PIL
crop with normalized (0–1) box coordinates. Supports both single-crop CLI and YAML
batch config.
After raw extraction, run ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/trim_caption.py to
auto-remove journal headers / figure captions / surrounding whitespace so
that only the figure body remains — the Adobe-Acrobat-crop equivalent in
automation. The script uses horizontal-projection segmentation plus
text-band detection (height + density + gap + line-pattern signature) and
preserves multi-panel figures intact:
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/trim_caption.py" \
--in-dir figures/extracted \
--out-dir figures/cropped
Handles four common journal layouts: top running-head bar, bottom multi-line
caption (sparse text), bottom caption *fused* with figure body (no clear gap,
detected via narrow dark/light alternation), and multi-row tables with
footnotes (footnote cut, table rows preserved). No tesseract / OCR
dependency — Pillow + numpy only. Verified on 12-figure academic deck
(80–95% height retention; captions, journal banners, and CellPress-style
headers all removed). When the deck slot expects only the figure body
(default for build_pptx_nature_lancet.py), point FIG_DIR at the cropped
output dir.
When the build script parses inline bold / *italic* markers in slide
body or speaker notes, the italic rule must use **word-boundary lookahead /
lookbehind** so asterisk-bearing scientific tokens (HLA alleles like
DRB1*07:01, HLA-A*02:01, SNP IDs, footnote markers) are not eaten as
italic delimiters:
import re
pattern = re.compile(
r"(\*\*(?:(?!\*\*).)+?\*\*" # bold; inner single * allowed
r"|(?<![A-Za-z0-9])\*[^*\n]+?\*(?![A-Za-z0-9]))" # italic (word-boundary)
)
Two regex tricks together:
(?<![A-Za-z0-9]) and (?![A-Za-z0-9]) reject* adjacent to alphanumerics, so DRB1*07:01 is left intact.
*: (?:(?!\*\*).)+? allowsDRB1*04:02 (HLA allele inside bold) to match as a single bold span.
Without these, a naive \*[^*]+\* italic pattern silently corrupts every
HLA allele in the deck. Add the regex to add_styled() (or equivalent) in
every Nature/Lancet-style build script.
For decks where the presenter is uncomfortable with English pronunciation of
acronyms, author names, drug names, or gene symbols, append a per-slide
[ Pronunciation ] section to the speaker notes (audience sees nothing —
only Presenter View). Use
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/inject_pronunciation_notes.py:
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/inject_pronunciation_notes.py" \
input.pptx output.pptx \
--dict pron_dict.yaml \
--header "[ 발음 ]" # or any header you like
The script:
PRON_DICT (term → [reading, full_name]) supplied bythe caller. The dict is domain-specific — assemble it for your audience
(Korean readings, French readings, Spanish readings, etc.).
(?<![A-Za-z0-9_]) … (?![A-Za-z0-9_]) soshort acronyms (e.g. AE, OR) only match when standalone, never inside
other words.
(\b(?:HLA-)?[A-Z]{1,5}[0-9]?\*[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}\b by default) and
synthesizes their reading from the base allele entry in the dict.
Realistic yield on a 47-slide academic deck: ~38 slides receive a section,
~300 total term entries, 5–10 per annotated slide. Transition and divider
slides have empty notes and are auto-skipped.
When the slide body already shows exact OR / 95% CI / p-value, the notes
should NOT repeat the same numbers — the presenter ends up reading
statistics aloud and the audience cannot keep up. Notes should be a
narrative (key anchors + one-line "see the slide body for the exact
numbers" reminder), not a numeric listing.
Quick measurement to spot dense slides during QC:
import re
text = slide.notes_slide.notes_text_frame.text.split(pron_header)[0]
n_char = len(text)
n_stat = len(re.findall(r"\b(?:OR|p|CI)\s*[=<>]?\s*\d|\d+\.\d+|\d+%|×10", text))
needs_compression = n_char > 1000 and n_stat >= 5
Rule of thumb: 700–1,000 chars + 0–2 stat tokens is fine (30–60-second
narrative). >1,000 chars + ≥5 stat tokens → compress to narrative tone and
point at the slide body. Exact numbers belong in the slide body and
footnotes (SSOT), not the notes.
After the presentation, when the deck is shared with the audience (e.g. a
professor asking for the slides), the speaker notes typically contain
presenter-only material — second-language narrative, pronunciation hints,
self-referential reminders ("Prof. ○○ will likely ask about …"). Stripping
notes is mandatory before circulation. Use
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/strip_notes_for_sharing.py:
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/strip_notes_for_sharing.py" \
presenter_v9.pptx share/<topic>_<initials>.pptx
The script:
notes_text_frame (idempotent, slide body andfigures untouched).
docProps/app.xml with the correct Slides= and Notes=counts so PowerPoint Mac does not show its repair dialog (see also the
app.xml canonical fix in pptx-mac-compatibility.md §5).
Recommended 3-file sharing package (filename pattern <topic>_<initials>):
<topic>_<initials>.pptx — notes-stripped variant for slide reuse<topic>_<initials>.pdf — same deck, PDF for environment-agnosticpreview (LibreOffice --convert-to pdf automatically drops the cleared
notes pages)
<topic>_<initials>_references.zip — optional bundle of the referencePDFs; if it exceeds the email attachment limit, send a Google Drive link.
In the cover email, mention the PPTX is included specifically so the
recipient can reuse individual slides if useful.
inline structured data (lists/dicts in build_*_slides())
↓ template functions (T_lead / T_text / T_table / ...)
editable PPTX with native text frames (selectable, restyleable in PowerPoint)
Three rules that keep slides stable:
cur_top cumulative position tracking. Use the fixed coordinate zones below — cur_top accumulates rounding errors and breaks layout after ~10 slides.| Template | Use for | Required fields |
|----------|---------|-----------------|
| T_lead | Title slide, section divider | title, subtitle?, extra? |
| T_text | Bullet body (most common) | title, body_lines[], subtitle? |
| T_table | Cohort tables, comparisons | title, headers[], rows[][], body_before? |
| T_image_right | Body + figure on right | title, body_lines[], img_path, img_pct? (PNG ≥300dpi or vector PDF — see Figure source formats below) |
| T_quote_slide | Verbatim citations, witness quotes | title, quotes[], body_after?, img_path? |
| T_two_col | Compare/contrast | title, left_lines[], right_lines[] |
| T_two_col_with_box | Compare + emphasis | as above + metaphor_col, metaphor_lines[] |
| T_highlight_slide | Single key result | title, highlight_lines[], body_before? |
| T_metaphor_body | Body + analogy footer | title, body_lines[], metaphor_lines[] |
| T_table_two_col | Take-aways + numeric table | title, left_lines[], headers[], rows[][] |
/make-figures output)When the deck pulls figures from analysis/figures/ produced by /make-figures:
add_picture() handles this directly. Set img_pct (template T_image_right) so the figure occupies ≥40 % of slide width on a 13.33 × 7.5-in widescreen layout.pdftoppm -r 300 input.pdf out_prefix) before insertion, because python-pptx PDF embedding is unreliable across PowerPoint versions.Hard rule. This is the highest-yield rule in the skill, and it is the one thing practitioners
report actually working when they hand slide-making to an agent:
> "에이전틱하게 PPT 도구를 사용하거나 / 웹페이지 형식으로 구성하는 경우는 거의 100% 실패함. 그나마
> 성공률을 높일 방법은 다이어그램 / 플롯을 모두 잘 알려진 도구(matplotlib 등)를 활용해 '코드'로
> 그리도록 시킨 다음, 그 결과를 그대로 삽입하도록 지시하는 방법인 듯."
| Content | Draw it with | Never |
|---|---|---|
| Any chart | matplotlib / R (/make-figures) | Hand-placed shapes pretending to be a chart |
| Flow, mechanism, pipeline, hierarchy | matplotlib, or Graphviz DOT when the graph *is* the point | python-pptx autoshapes |
| Study flow (STROBE/PRISMA) | /make-figures flow builders | Boxes drawn one at a time |
Then insert the rendered PNG (≥300 dpi) with add_picture().
Why the ban. Building a diagram out of autoshapes produces both AI tells at once: a row of
identical rounded rectangles (SHAPE_MONOTONY) joined by arrows nobody labelled
(ARROW_NO_SEMANTICS). Graphviz makes the second one *structurally hard to get wrong* — a DOT edge
must be written A -> B [label="seeds along"], so the language itself demands the arrow declare
what it claims:
digraph mechanism {
rankdir=LR; node [shape=box, fontname="Inter"];
catheter -> tract [label="seeds along"];
tract -> nodule [label="grows into"]; // an arrow that says what it means
}
An arrow is a claim — *causes, becomes, flows into, is compared with, predicts*. Six claims, one
glyph. Drawn unlabelled, every person in the room supplies a different verb, and one wrong arrow can
derail an entire discussion. See references/ai_slide_tells.md §4–5.
The one exception: a single, deliberate, labelled shape used as an accent (a callout box, a
highlight frame). One shape is a choice; eight identical ones are a generator.
| Helper | Role |
|--------|------|
| _text | Single text box with bold inline markup |
| _multiline | Multi-line block with bullet (- , ✓ ) and ### subhead support |
| _title_block | Title + teal underline + optional subtitle |
| _table | Styled table (teal header row, alternating rows) |
| _quote | Blockquote — teal left bar + light-blue background |
| _highlight | Yellow rounded box + orange 2pt border |
| _metaphor | Same shape as quote, lighter font |
| _image | PIL aspect-preserving image insert (handles iPhone EXIF if you transpose first) |
| _slidenum | Bottom-right page number |
NAVY = #1B2A4A # title text, section divider background
TEAL = #0072B2 # subtitle, underline, table header bg, quote bar
ORANGE = #D55E00 # highlight box border
GRAY = #333333 # body text
FONT = 'Apple SD Gothic Neo' # use a Latin-only font on non-Korean decks
ML / MR = 0.8" MT = 0.5" CW = SW − ML − MR = 11.733"
TITLE_Y = 0.5" TITLE_H = 0.8"
SUB_Y = 1.3" SUB_H = 0.5"
BODY_Y ≈ 1.9" BODY_H ≈ 5.1"
A from-scratch generation script must:
add_picture (Mac PowerPoint silently drops TIFF).docProps/app.xml (<Slides>, <Notes>, HeadingPairs, TitlesOfParts) to the actual count, or PowerPoint Mac will raise a recovery dialog on open.<a:srcRect> from another deck, copy the values verbatim — they are 1/1000-percent (cap 100000), never EMU. A unit conversion bug here crops 99% of the image off-slide.cur_top cumulative top tracking (accumulates rounding error).python-pptx from-scratch rebuild to *edit* an existing deck — see Patch over Rebuild below.PowerPoint Mac is stricter than Windows / Keynote / LibreOffice on OOXML defects.
Verify before delivering any deck destined for a Mac viewer:
| Defect | Detect | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| TIFF images | find ppt/media -iname '*.tif*' | sips -s format png in.tif --out out.png + replace .tif→.png in _rels/*.rels |
| <a:sp3d> in rPr | grep -l '<a:sp3d>' ppt/slides/*.xml | Regex-strip the <a:sp3d>...</a:sp3d> block (renders as red outline only on Mac) |
| app.xml count mismatch | <Slides> value + HeadingPairs count + TitlesOfParts size vs actual slide files | Sync all four fields to real count |
| srcRect corruption | Any value > 100000 (1/1000-percent cap) | Compare with original deck; restore verbatim |
Validation must run on PDF export AND Mac PowerPoint — neither alone catches all four. PDF misses sp3d outlines and srcRect corruption.
When the user supplies an existing deck and asks for surgical edits (textbox width, image
crop, font swap, sp3d removal), prefer regex/sed patching of the unzipped XML over
regenerating with python-pptx. From-scratch rebuild loses:
<a:srcRect> image crops<a:sp3d> / <a:scene3d> (when intentional)app.xml and core.xml metadataunzip -q original.pptx -d /tmp/work
python3 -c "
import re; from pathlib import Path
p = Path('/tmp/work/ppt/slides/slide23.xml')
s = p.read_text()
s = s.replace('cx=\"9504720\"', 'cx=\"11200000\"')
p.write_text(s)
"
cd /tmp/work && zip -rq ../patched.pptx . -x '*.DS_Store'
python-pptx is reserved for (a) brand-new decks built via the templates above, or
(b) appending speaker notes via slide.notes_slide.notes_text_frame.text. The skill's
scripts/inject_speaker_notes.py is the canonical example of (b). It parses inline
bold / *italic* into run-level styling by default (python-pptx stores text
verbatim, so the markers would otherwise show literally in Presenter View — the failure
mode pptx-speaker-notes.md warns against); pass --no-markdown for legacy plain text.
A reproducible check lives at tests/test_speaker_notes_markdown.py.
T_lead) — paper citation + presenterT_text × 1–2)T_text or T_two_col)T_image_right / T_table × 2–3)T_text)T_two_col_with_box works well)T_text or T_highlight_slide)Save to output/presentation.pptx. Speaker notes go into the notes pane only — never
modify slide design when adding notes.
After exporting the PPTX, run the slide critic rubric at
references/critic_rubrics/slide.md. Score each slide and the deck-level Mac
compatibility checks (Section F) as PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL. Produce concrete edits for
every FAIL or PARTIAL item before treating the deck as ready.
Mandatory deck-level checks (cross-link with ~/.claude/rules/pptx-mac-compatibility.md):
# F.22 No TIFF
find ppt/media -iname '*.tif*' || true # must be empty
# F.23 No 3-D bevel
grep -l '<a:sp3d>' ppt/slides/*.xml # must be empty
# F.24 app.xml count sync
grep -c '<Slides>\|<Notes>' docProps/app.xml
ls ppt/slides/slide*.xml | wc -l # must match
# F.25 srcRect bounds (any value > 100000 = bug)
grep -oE '"[0-9]{6,}"' ppt/slides/*.xml | head
Record critic_pass: yes | partial | no and refine_rounds: N in _quick_review.md.
python3 scripts/check_slide_tells.py output/presentation.pptx --json output/qc/slide_tells.json
python3 scripts/check_deck_budget.py output/presentation.pptx --json output/qc/deck_budget.json \
--archetype <from Q0> --minutes <from Q0>
check_deck_budget.py is the mechanical half of the archetype: slides against the clock
(DECK_OVER_BUDGET), words per slide against what *this* room can absorb while also listening
(SLIDE_TOO_DENSE), and the type floor for the back row (TYPE_TOO_SMALL). It takes an archetype
rather than a universal threshold because a single global number would have to be wrong for most
venues. --list prints the budgets.
Six verdicts, each one a mark reviewers say they can spot instantly. **Every one must be cleared or
consciously overruled**, with the reason written down:
| Verdict | What it found | The fix |
|---|---|---|
| CHROME_ON_EVERY_SLIDE | Eyebrow labels / brand footers on ≥60% of slides | Keep the page number and the dividers. Delete the rest. |
| SCAFFOLD_PHRASE | A slide (or note) narrating its own construction — "요약하자면", "The key takeaway is…" | Delete the sentence; say the thing it was pointing at. |
| TOPIC_TITLE | A content slide titled "Results" instead of stating the result | Assertion headline: *"Adjunctive ablation halved local recurrence (12% vs 26%)."* |
| SHAPE_MONOTONY | The same box, eight times, at the same size | Parallel ideas → one table. Non-parallel ideas → different shapes. |
| DEAD_SPACE_BAND | A mostly-empty slide with a hole through the middle | Say more, or say one thing large. |
| ARROW_NO_SEMANTICS | ≥2 arrows, none labelled | Label every arrow, or add a legend. An arrow is a claim. |
The detector is stdlib-only and reads any .pptx, so it also works on a deck a colleague sends
you, or one you did not build here.
It is not a style opinion, and it does not detect "was AI used". Used as a booster, AI leaves
none of these marks. Used as a button, it leaves all of them.
Mode B: Add notes to existing slides (more common)
inject_notes.py script tailored to the specific presentationGenerate a tailored inject_notes.py following the pattern in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/inject_speaker_notes.py. The generated script should
contain only the notes dictionary customized for this presentation and the main
injection loop from the template.
Speaker notes are injected without modifying slide design, layout, text, or images.
The script only touches the notes pane. Verify by comparing slide content before and after.
Mode C: Fill an institutional / branded template
When the user supplied a .pptx/.potx at Step 0b (university, hospital, society
template with a fixed logo and theme), fill it — do not redesign it. This is
*patch-over-rebuild* (~/.claude/rules/pptx-mac-compatibility.md §2): a from-scratch
Presentation() would drop the institution's master, theme, and logo.
python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/inspect_pptx_template.py <template>→ lists every layout (index, name) with its placeholders (idx, type, size) plus theme
fonts/colors. Read it before writing content.
Title+Content / Section Header / Closing). Do not invent layouts.
placeholder_format.idx (from the inspector) so the institution's fonts,sizes, and logo are inherited — never add free text boxes for title/body. Code pattern
and the no-usable-body-layout fallback are in
references/slide_visual_styles/institutional_brand.md.
scripts/inject_speaker_notes.py as usual (notes are template-independent).
intact); confirm the logo media is still embedded; sync docProps/app.xml after
adding/deleting slides (pptx-mac-compatibility.md §5–5.1).
The content rules (presentation_design_guidelines.md) still apply inside the brand —
one idea per slide, redrawn tables, ≤3 colors *within* the institution's palette.
Generate questions from multiple perspectives:
Every answer should follow the pattern:
Acknowledge → Evidence → Conclude
"That's an important limitation. [Acknowledge the concern honestly.]
However, [cite specific supporting evidence — author, year, finding].
So while [restate limitation], [conclude with the paper's contribution despite it]."
A single-page reference for last-minute review:
## Quick Review
### Must-Know Numbers
| Metric | Value | Source |
|--------|-------|--------|
| [Key stat 1] | [value] | [Ref] |
| [Key stat 2] | [value] | [Ref] |
### Common Pitfalls
- Don't confuse [X] with [Y]
- [Classification A] and [Classification B] are independent frameworks
- Slide says [rounded value], precise value is [exact value]
### Key Takeaways (memorize these)
1. [Point 1]
2. [Point 2]
3. [Point 3]
All outputs go in the user's presentation directory:
{presentation_dir}/
├── _analysis.md # Phase 0: Paper analysis + outline
├── _references.md # Phase 1: Verified references + key data
├── _script.md # Phase 2: Speaker script
├── _qa_prep.md # Phase 4: Expected Q&A
├── _quick_review.md # Phase 4: Pre-presentation review sheet + critic_pass record
├── _slide_critic.md # Phase 3.5: Slide rubric scores per slide
├── inject_notes.py # Phase 3: Tailored note injection script
├── figures/ # Extracted paper figures (if needed)
└── reference/ # Supporting paper PDFs (if downloaded)
This skill composes with adjacent skills and global rules:
| When | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Need a figure on a slide (ROC, forest, KM, flow) | /make-figures first, then embed | Both skills share Reynolds/Knaflic/Tufte foundations; figure-level + slide-level companions |
| Manuscript reporting checklist parallel | /check-reporting for the same paper | Paper presentations often shadow manuscript revision; reporting-guideline gaps surface in Q&A |
| Visual abstract / Central Illustration | /make-figures visual-abstract templates | Then verify against ~/.claude/rules/journal-ai-image-policies.md (JACC prohibits, Radiology allows with disclosure) |
| PPTX edits to existing institutional template | ~/.claude/rules/pptx-mac-compatibility.md | Patch over rebuild; preserve master/layout/srcRect |
| Manuscript companion deck | ~/.claude/rules/manuscript-style-classical.md | Heading style, AI-Disclosure policy, em-dash discipline carry over to slides for senior MA reviewer audiences |
| References on slides | /verify-refs (audit-only) before delivery | Same anti-hallucination gate as manuscript references |
/search-lit with confirmed DOI or PMID. Mark unverified references as [UNVERIFIED - NEEDS MANUAL CHECK].[VERIFY] and ask the user.Some passages in this skill cite a path of the form ~/.claude/rules/<name>.md. Those are the
maintainer's personal global rules, kept outside this repository. They are **not shipped with
this skill** and will not exist on your machine; they appear only as provenance for where a
convention came from. If one of them looks like it is standing in for an instruction you actually
need, that is a bug — please open an issue, because the instruction belongs here.
Take aperivue/present-paper from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.