mcpbeat

Lit Sync

aperivue/lit-sync

Sync research references from .bib files to Zotero library + Obsidian literature notes. Extract cross-cutting concept notes when enough literature accumulates. Works after /search-lit or standalone.

7k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
4
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
230
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill lit-sync

The instruction itself

41 sections, as written by the author

Literature Sync: Zotero + Obsidian Pipeline

Takes the .bib output of /search-lit (or any user-specified .bib file) and

synchronizes the references into the Zotero library and Obsidian literature notes.

When enough literature notes accumulate, extracts cross-cutting concept notes.

Communication Rules

  • Communicate with the user in their preferred language.
  • Vault layout — honor what exists, default to English. Before creating notes, detect the

vault's existing layout: if the vault already uses a particular folder structure (including a

Korean one such as 02 연구/문헌/ and 02 연구/개념노트/), **honor it — never silently

rename a user's folders**. For a new or unclear vault, default to the English folders

Literature/ and Concepts/ with the English note templates below.

  • A Korean opt-in variant (Korean folder layout + Korean-heading templates) lives in

references/locale/ko/note_templates.md — use it when the vault is Korean-structured or the

user prefers Korean notes.

When to Use

  • After /search-lit completes — sync the produced .bib into Zotero + Obsidian.
  • Bulk-register references from an existing .bib into Zotero + Obsidian.
  • Tidy the references/ folder inside a project workspace.
  • On explicit concept-extraction request → extract cross-cutting concepts from existing literature notes.

Prerequisites

  • Project owner only/lit-sync is an owner-scoped operation per docs/zotero_policy.md. Collaborators consume the committed manuscript/_src/refs.bib snapshot read-only.
  • Zotero desktop 7.x + Better BibTeX plugin installed.
  • Better BibTeX "Keep updated" auto-export configured to <project>/manuscript/_src/refs.bib (owner setup checklist in docs/zotero_policy.md §Setup).
  • Zotero MCP server available (skip the Zotero phase if not connected; auto-export refresh still fires once Zotero is reopened).
  • Obsidian CLI or direct file writing to the Obsidian vault.
  • Obsidian vault path: configured in user's environment (e.g., $OBSIDIAN_VAULT).

Artifact Contract

Per docs/artifact_contract.md, /lit-sync is the sole writer of:

| Artifact | Writer | Readers |

|---|---|---|

| manuscript/_src/refs.bib | /lit-sync (via Better BibTeX auto-export trigger) | /write-paper, /verify-refs, /manage-refs |

| references/zotero_collection.json | /lit-sync | /verify-refs, /sync-submission |

Direct hand edits to refs.bib are drift — revert on sight.

Pipeline Overview

.bib file (or /search-lit output)
    │
    ▼ Phase 1: Parse
    Extract DOI, PMID, title, authors, journal, year
    │
    ▼ Phase 2: Zotero Sync (owner)
    Dedupe → zotero_add_by_doi → place in collection → pin citekey
    │
    ▼ Phase 2.5: refs.bib snapshot refresh
    Trigger Better BibTeX auto-export → verify manuscript/_src/refs.bib mtime updated
    │
    ▼ Phase 2.7: Fulltext Retrieval (opt-in)
    Disk OA PDFs via /fulltext-retrieval + in-library via find_available_pdf.js → reconcile report
    │
    ▼ Phase 3: Obsidian Literature Notes
    Create Literature/{citekey}.md (empty note OK — fill later with highlights)
    │
    ▼ Phase 4: Concept Extraction (conditional)
    ≥10 literature notes → scan for cross-cutting concepts → propose concept notes

Phase 1: Parse BibTeX

Input

The user-specified .bib file path, or the .bib just produced by /search-lit.

Process

# Parse .bib entries with regex.
# Extract per entry:
#   - citekey (e.g., Kim_2024_Validation)
#   - doi
#   - pmid
#   - title
#   - authors (first + last minimum)
#   - journal
#   - year
#   - volume, number, pages (if present)

Log any parse failures and skip those entries.


Phase 2: Zotero Sync

Step 2.1: Determine project collection

Identify the project from the current working directory or from an explicit user

override. Reuse an existing collection key if one is recorded; otherwise create a

new collection.

Collection mapping: Check existing Zotero collections for the current project.

If no collection exists, create one with zotero_create_collection. Record the

collection key for future use.

Step 2.2: Dedupe + add

For each entry:

  • Use zotero_search_items to search by DOI or title — if already present, skip.

This search-first step is what prevents duplicates; zotero_add_by_doi does not

dedupe by itself (it fetches CrossRef and creates the item), so never skip the search.

  • Otherwise call zotero_add_by_doi (when a DOI is available) or

zotero_add_by_url (falling back to the PubMed URL when no DOI is available).

  • zotero_add_by_doi accepts an attach_mode argument that governs the **OA child-PDF

attach attempt at add time** (the installed server treats linked_url as "bookmark the

PDF URL"; other values download/import). Set it when you want a PDF attached during the

add. Exact accepted values are server-version-specific — verify against the connected

server. Do not use zotero_add_from_file to attach a PDF to an item added here: it

has no parent-item argument and would create a duplicate parent item.

  • Use zotero_manage_collections to place the item in the project collection.

Step 2.3: Result report

Zotero Sync:
  Added:     8 papers (new)
  Skipped:   3 papers (already in library)
  Failed:    1 paper (no DOI/PMID)
  Collection: RFA-Meta (TZQEP4NH)

If the Zotero MCP is not connected, skip this entire phase and proceed to Phase 3.

Always write references/zotero_collection.json in the project workspace:

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "status": "synced",
  "collection": "RFA-Meta",
  "collection_key": "TZQEP4NH",
  "added": 8,
  "skipped": 3,
  "failed": 1
}

If Zotero is unavailable, write the same file with status: "skipped" and a

human-readable reason.


Phase 2.5: refs.bib snapshot refresh

Better BibTeX "Keep updated" auto-export normally refreshes manuscript/_src/refs.bib within seconds of a Zotero change. This phase verifies the snapshot actually updated before downstream skills consume it.

Step 2.5.1: Resolve path

Read SSOT.yamltruth.refs_bib. Default: manuscript/_src/refs.bib. If absent (legacy project), fall back to manuscript/_src/refs.bib and emit a WARN recommending SSOT migration.

Step 2.5.1b: Precondition assertion (early-exit, do NOT poll)

Before entering the 10s polling loop in Step 2.5.2, verify both preconditions. If either fails, abort Phase 2.5 with setup instructions instead of waiting for a timeout that will never resolve.

  • BBT auto-export registered. ~/Zotero/better-bibtex/read-only.json must be a non-empty JSON list. Check with:
   python3 -c 'import json,sys,pathlib; p=pathlib.Path.home()/".zotero"/"zotero"/"Profiles"; \
     f=pathlib.Path.home()/"Zotero"/"better-bibtex"/"read-only.json"; \
     sys.exit(0 if f.exists() and json.loads(f.read_text() or "[]") else 1)'

Or equivalent shell: [ -s ~/Zotero/better-bibtex/read-only.json ] && [ "$(jq 'length' ~/Zotero/better-bibtex/read-only.json)" -gt 0 ].

On failure print:

> Phase 2.5 skipped: BBT auto-export not configured (~/Zotero/better-bibtex/read-only.json is empty or missing). Set up "Keep updated" auto-export per docs/zotero_policy.md §Setup, then re-run /lit-sync.

  • Target refs.bib exists. The resolved truth.refs_bib path from Step 2.5.1 must exist on disk (even empty is OK — BBT will overwrite). On failure print:

> Phase 2.5 skipped: target snapshot <path> not found. Configure BBT auto-export with "On Change" to the SSOT path, then re-run.

In either early-exit, set refs_bib_refreshed: false + reason: "precondition:<which>" in the Step 2.5.3 JSON and return control to the caller. Record it and tell the user; nothing downstream enforces it. verify_refs.py has never read this flag, and the sentence that said it did was the only thing standing between a stale refs.bib and a manuscript.

Step 2.5.2: Verify refresh

After Phase 2 adds items:

  • Capture stat -f "%m" manuscript/_src/refs.bib before Zotero writes.
  • Wait up to 10s (Better BibTeX debounce). Poll mtime.
  • If mtime unchanged after 10s:
  • Prompt user to check Zotero is running and BBT export is "Keep updated".
  • If BBT auto-export path is wrong, print the expected path (<project>/manuscript/_src/refs.bib) and refer to docs/zotero_policy.md §Setup.
  • As last resort, offer manual export: File → Export Library → Better BibTeX → target path.
  • Once mtime advances, grep for the newly added citekeys. All must be present; if any is missing, report as failure (do NOT fabricate entries).

Step 2.5.3: Record in zotero_collection.json

Append to the JSON written in Step 2.3:

{
  "refs_bib_path": "manuscript/_src/refs.bib",
  "refs_bib_mtime": "2026-04-24T14:32:11Z",
  "refs_bib_refreshed": true,
  "citekeys_verified": ["Kim_2024_Validation", "..."]
}

If refresh failed, set refs_bib_refreshed: false and include reason. The flag records whether the export ran. It is a note to the reader, not a gate.


Phase 2.7: Fulltext Retrieval (opt-in, owner-only)

Run only when the user asks for full text (e.g. "download the PDFs", "fetch full

text", or a worklist supplied with that intent). Default /lit-sync stays metadata-only

and network-light — do not auto-run this phase. Runs after items are in Zotero (Phase 2)

and the snapshot is verified (Phase 2.5), before Obsidian notes (Phase 3).

There are two complementary retrieval routes; offer both and reconcile them in one report:

Route A — disk OA PDFs (for downstream skills)

Delegate to the /fulltext-retrieval engine (do not re-implement the OA cascade or

import its code; invoke it by path). Resolve the engine as:

ENGINE="${MEDSCI_SKILLS_ROOT:-$HOME/workspace/medsci-skills}/skills/fulltext-retrieval/fetch_oa.py"
python3 "$ENGINE" <worklist> -o pdfs/ -e <contact-email> --report pdfs/retrieval_report.json

<worklist> is the DOI/PMID(/Title) list — the Phase-1 .bib DOIs, the worklist supplied

in the standalone mode below, or the project collection's DOIs. Output: pdfs/*.pdf for

/meta-analysis and pdf_to_md.py, plus

pdfs/retrieval_report.json (per-DOI status/source/title_match).

Route B — in-library PDFs (Zotero-native, higher yield, proxy-aware)

Emit ${MEDSCI_SKILLS_ROOT:-$HOME/workspace/medsci-skills}/skills/fulltext-retrieval/references/find_available_pdf.js

for the user to paste into Zotero (*Tools → Developer → Run JavaScript*) with the project

collection selected. It triggers Zotero's own addAvailablePDF/addAvailablePDFs, which

reuse the user's OpenURL resolver / institutional proxy — so it typically retrieves more

than OA-only, while no credentials or institutional identifiers enter this skill. The

no-code equivalent is right-click → "Find Available PDF". This route is user-initiated and

session-dependent; record its {attached, missing} summary from the printed JSON.

Report

Merge Route A's pdfs/retrieval_report.json (and the user-reported Route B summary) into

references/fulltext_retrieval.json (owner of this file is /lit-sync):

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "retrieved_oa_disk": [{"doi": "...", "source": "unpaywall", "file": "...", "title_match": "match"}],
  "retrieved_zotero_native": [{"doi": "...", "via": "addAvailablePDF"}],
  "not_retrieved": [{"doi": "...", "journal": "..."}],
  "institutional_fallback": ["<DOIs needing institutional access / ILL / author contact>"],
  "title_mismatch_flagged": ["<DOIs whose downloaded PDF title did not match>"]
}

Also append a short fulltext block (counts) to references/zotero_collection.json.

not_retrieved DOIs are candidates for institutional access, interlibrary loan, or author

contact — never bypass paywalls or access controls from this skill.


Phase 3: Obsidian Literature Notes

Step 3.1: Check existing literature notes

# Default English layout; substitute the vault's existing folder if one is present
# (e.g. "02 연구/문헌/" for a Korean-structured vault — see references/locale/ko/note_templates.md).
ls "$VAULT/Literature/" | grep -v "📊" | wc -l

Step 3.2: Create literature notes

For each .bib entry, create Literature/{citekey}.md (or the vault's existing literature folder).

Skip if the file already exists (never overwrite).

Template
---
notetype: literature
citekey: "{citekey}"
title: "{title}"
authors: "{authors}"
journal: "{journal}"
year: {year}
doi: "{doi}"
pmid: "{pmid}"
created: "{today}"
tags:
  - type/literature
  - _unread
---

# {title}

## Bibliographic info
- **Authors**: {authors}
- **Journal**: {journal}{volume_issue_pages}
- **Year**: {year}
- **DOI**: [{doi}](https://doi.org/{doi})
{pmid_line}

## Key points (in my own words)

## My thoughts

## Related notes
- [[Research Hub]]
- [[Papers & Reviews]]
-
-

(For a Korean-structured vault, use the Korean-heading template in references/locale/ko/note_templates.md and the vault's own hub-note names.)

Rules:

  • notetype: literature — compatible with the Zotero Integration template.
  • _unread tag — change to _read later after the user reads the PDF in Zotero and adds highlights.
  • Leave ## Key points and ## My thoughts blank — the user fills these in personally.
  • ## Related notes contains 2 hub links + 2 empty slots (reserved for later concept-note linking).
  • If a PMID is available, add a PubMed link.

Step 3.3: Result report

Obsidian Literature Notes:
  Created:   8 notes (new)
  Skipped:   3 notes (already exist)
  Location:  Literature/
  Total in vault: 12 literature notes

Phase 4: Concept Extraction (conditional)

Trigger condition

Run this phase only when there are ≥10 literature notes in the vault.

If fewer exist, print a status message like "N literature notes — concept extraction

unlocks at ≥10" and stop.

Step 4.1: Cross-cutting concept scan

Read all files under Literature/*.md (or the vault's existing literature folder):

  • Extract keywords from each paper's title, journal, and tags.
  • Extract major concepts from the .bib entry titles.
  • Identify concepts that co-occur across ≥3 literature notes.

Step 4.2: Filtering (5 exclusion rules)

Exclude from concept candidates:

  • Model names (GPT-4, Claude, etc.).
  • Dataset names (MedQA, ImageNet, etc.).
  • Journal names.
  • Institution names.
  • Generic technique names (too unspecific).

Whatever remains becomes a concept-note candidate.

Step 4.3: Draft concept note

Create Concepts/{concept name}.md (or the vault's existing concept-note folder):

---
title: "{concept name}"
type: concept
tags:
  - concept
  - {domain tag}
aliases:
  - {alternative name}
related_papers:
  - "[[{lit-note-1}]]"
  - "[[{lit-note-2}]]"
  - "[[{lit-note-3}]]"
status: 🌱Seedling
---

# {concept name}

## Definition (My Understanding)
> TODO: write in your own words

## Why it matters
{why the concept matters in this domain — AI supplies a draft}

## Per-paper perspectives
- **[[{lit-note-1}]]**: {this paper's angle}
- **[[{lit-note-2}]]**: {a different angle}
- **[[{lit-note-3}]]**: {comparison / complement}

## Related concepts
- [[{another concept}]]

## Open questions
- {open question 1}
- {open question 2}

## Related notes
- [[Research Hub]]
- [[{related project hub}]]
- [[{lit-note-1}]]
- [[{lit-note-2}]]

(For a Korean-structured vault, use the Korean-heading concept template in references/locale/ko/note_templates.md.)

Key rules:

  • Keep the ## Definition section as a > TODO marker — the 2nd-layer note only becomes

meaningful once the user writes the definition in their own words.

  • status always starts at 🌱Seedling.
  • At least 4 wikilinks under ## Related notes (vault convention).

Step 4.4: Propose to the user

Concept-note candidates (≥3 papers cross-referenced):
  1. {Concept A} (4 papers)
  2. {Concept B} (3 papers)
  3. {Concept C} (5 papers)

Create? (all / selected / skip)

Create only after user confirmation. Auto-draft but always confirm.


Standalone Modes

This skill can run without a fresh .bib file.

Concept extraction only

On an explicit concept-extraction request, scan existing

Literature/*.md (or the vault's existing literature folder) and run only Phase 4.

References tidy

On a "tidy this project's references" request, locate .bib files inside the

workspace and run Phase 1–3.

Zotero sync only

On a "sync Zotero" request, diff the Zotero collection against the .bib file

and add whatever is missing.

PMID-list ingestion (no .bib)

When the user supplies a list of PMIDs (e.g., from a HANDOFF or a colleague), resolve

PMIDs to DOIs via PubMed esummary first, then enter Phase 2 with the DOIs:

PMIDS="12345,67890,..."
curl -s "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=${PMIDS}&retmode=json" \
  | jq -r '.result | to_entries[] | select(.key != "uids") | "\(.value.uid)\t\(.value.elocationid)\t\(.value.title)"'

For each resolved DOI, search-first with zotero_search_items, then call

zotero_add_by_doi — the search is what dedupes (add-by-doi alone does not). For items

already in the library (detected via zotero_search_items by DOI), use

zotero_manage_collections to attach them to the project collection without re-adding

re-adding by URL/PubMed-URL would bypass the search dedup and create duplicates. Record both

added and existing items in references/zotero_collection.json.

If a PMID has no DOI in PubMed (rare; older papers, non-indexed), fall back to

zotero_add_by_url with the PubMed URL and mark the entry as no_doi: true.

Worklist ingestion (DOI/PMID/Title; no .bib)

When the user supplies a worklist file (a .tsv/.csv/.md table with a DOI column,

optional PMID/Title, or a plain DOI-per-line list — e.g. an SR include set), enter

Phase 2 directly from it: resolve any PMID-only rows to DOIs (esummary above), then run the

search-first dedupe + add loop. The same worklist file feeds Phase 2.7 Route A

(fetch_oa.py reads .tsv/.csv/.md/plain natively), so no reformatting is needed.


Safety Rules

  • Never overwrite literature notes — the user may have added highlights or

personal notes.

  • Never auto-fill ## Definition of a concept note — keep the TODO marker; the

essence of the 2nd-layer note is the user's own wording.

  • Skip Zotero for entries without a DOI — ask the user to add those manually.
  • Gracefully skip Zotero when the MCP is not connected — Obsidian notes are

created independently; but do NOT hand-edit refs.bib to compensate (violates artifact contract).

  • Always record the collection key — report the key to the user when a new

collection is created.

  • Never write refs.bib directly. Only Better BibTeX auto-export may write that file. If auto-export is broken, fix the Zotero setup rather than writing the file from this skill.
  • Owner-only execution. If the current user is a collaborator (no Zotero access per SSOT.yaml reference_manager.required_for), abort with instructions to flag [@NEW:topic] placeholders in the manuscript and notify the owner.
  • Fulltext boundary (Phase 2.7). Retrieve full text only via OA APIs (the

/fulltext-retrieval engine) and the user-run Zotero "Find Available PDF" snippet

(which uses the user's own proxy config). Never automate authenticated browser sessions,

never bypass paywalls/access controls, and never hard-code institutional proxies,

credentials, or hosts into this skill. not_retrieved items are routed to institutional

access / ILL / author contact, not worked around.

Anti-Hallucination

  • Never fabricate DOIs, PMIDs, or citation metadata. All bibliographic data must come from the .bib file or API responses.
  • Never auto-fill the "Definition (My Understanding)" section of concept notes. This must be written by the user.
  • Never overwrite existing literature notes. User highlights and annotations may be present.
  • If a DOI lookup fails, report the failure rather than guessing the metadata.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take aperivue/lit-sync from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.