Analyze pipeline health — prioritize deals, flag risks, get a weekly action plan. Use when running a weekly pipeline review, deciding which deals to focus on this week, spotting stale or stuck opportunities, auditing for hygiene issues like bad close dates, or identifying single-threaded deals.
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill pipeline-review
> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Analyze your pipeline health, prioritize deals, and get actionable recommendations for where to focus.
/pipeline-review [segment or rep]
Review pipeline for: $ARGUMENTS
If a file is referenced: @$1
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PIPELINE REVIEW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ STANDALONE (always works) │
│ ✓ Upload CSV export from your CRM │
│ ✓ Or paste/describe your deals │
│ ✓ Health check: flag stale, stuck, and at-risk deals │
│ ✓ Prioritization: rank deals by impact and closability │
│ ✓ Hygiene audit: missing data, bad close dates, single-thread │
│ ✓ Weekly action plan: what to focus on │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + CRM: Pull pipeline automatically, update records │
│ + Activity data for engagement scoring │
│ + Historical patterns for risk prediction │
│ + Calendar: See upcoming meetings per deal │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Option A: Upload a CSV
Export your pipeline from your CRM (e.g. Salesforce, HubSpot). Helpful fields:
Option B: Paste your deals
Acme Corp - $50K - Negotiation - closes Jan 31 - last activity Jan 20
TechStart - $25K - Demo scheduled - closes Feb 15 - no activity in 3 weeks
BigCo - $100K - Discovery - closes Mar 30 - created last week
Option C: Describe your pipeline
"I have 12 deals. Two big ones in negotiation that I'm confident about. Three stuck in discovery for over a month. The rest are mid-stage but I haven't talked to some of them in a while."
# Pipeline Review: [Date]
**Data Source:** [CSV upload / Manual input / CRM]
**Deals Analyzed:** [X]
**Total Pipeline Value:** $[X]
---
## Pipeline Health Score: [X/100]
| Dimension | Score | Issue |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| **Stage Progression** | [X]/25 | [X] deals stuck in same stage 30+ days |
| **Activity Recency** | [X]/25 | [X] deals with no activity in 14+ days |
| **Close Date Accuracy** | [X]/25 | [X] deals with close date in past |
| **Contact Coverage** | [X]/25 | [X] deals single-threaded |
---
## Priority Actions This Week
### 1. [Highest Priority Deal]
**Why:** [Reason — large, closing soon, at risk, etc.]
**Action:** [Specific next step]
**Impact:** $[X] if you close it
### 2. [Second Priority]
**Why:** [Reason]
**Action:** [Next step]
### 3. [Third Priority]
**Why:** [Reason]
**Action:** [Next step]
---
## Deal Prioritization Matrix
### Close This Week (Focus Time Here)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Next Action |
|------|--------|-------|------------|-------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [Date] | [Action] |
### Close This Month (Keep Warm)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Status |
|------|--------|-------|------------|--------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [Date] | [Status] |
### Nurture (Check-in Periodically)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Status |
|------|--------|-------|------------|--------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [Date] | [Status] |
---
## Risk Flags
### Stale Deals (No Activity 14+ Days)
| Deal | Amount | Last Activity | Days Silent | Recommendation |
|------|--------|---------------|-------------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Date] | [X] | [Re-engage / Downgrade / Remove] |
### Stuck Deals (Same Stage 30+ Days)
| Deal | Amount | Stage | Days in Stage | Recommendation |
|------|--------|-------|---------------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Stage] | [X] | [Push / Multi-thread / Qualify out] |
### Past Close Date
| Deal | Amount | Close Date | Days Overdue | Recommendation |
|------|--------|------------|--------------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Date] | [X] | [Update date / Push to next quarter / Close lost] |
### Single-Threaded (Only One Contact)
| Deal | Amount | Contact | Risk | Recommendation |
|------|--------|---------|------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Name] | Champion leaves = deal dies | [Identify additional stakeholders] |
---
## Hygiene Issues
| Issue | Count | Deals | Action |
|-------|-------|-------|--------|
| Missing close date | [X] | [List] | Add realistic close dates |
| Missing amount | [X] | [List] | Estimate or qualify |
| Missing next step | [X] | [List] | Define next action |
| No primary contact | [X] | [List] | Assign contact |
---
## Pipeline Shape
### By Stage
| Stage | # Deals | Value | % of Pipeline |
|-------|---------|-------|---------------|
| [Stage] | [X] | $[X] | [X]% |
### By Close Month
| Month | # Deals | Value |
|-------|---------|-------|
| [Month] | [X] | $[X] |
### By Deal Size
| Size | # Deals | Value |
|------|---------|-------|
| $100K+ | [X] | $[X] |
| $50K-100K | [X] | $[X] |
| $25K-50K | [X] | $[X] |
| <$25K | [X] | $[X] |
---
## Recommendations
### This Week
1. [ ] [Specific action for priority deal 1]
2. [ ] [Action for at-risk deal]
3. [ ] [Hygiene task]
### This Month
1. [ ] [Strategic action]
2. [ ] [Pipeline building if needed]
---
## Deals to Consider Removing
These deals may be dead weight:
| Deal | Amount | Reason | Recommendation |
|------|--------|--------|----------------|
| [Deal] | $[X] | [No activity 60+ days, no response] | Mark closed-lost |
| [Deal] | $[X] | [Pushed 3+ times, no champion] | Qualify out |
I'll rank your deals using this framework:
| Factor | Weight | What I Look For |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
| Close Date | 30% | Deals closing soonest get priority |
| Deal Size | 25% | Bigger deals = more focus |
| Stage | 20% | Later stage = more focus |
| Activity | 15% | Active deals get prioritized |
| Risk | 10% | Lower risk = safer bet |
You can tell me to weight differently: "Focus on big deals over soon deals" or "I need quick wins, prioritize close dates."
Assess Kubernetes workloads and cluster configuration for AKS Automatic compatibility. Identifies incompatibilities, generates fixes, and guides migration from AKS Standard to AKS Automatic. WHEN: migrate to AKS Automatic, check AKS Automatic readiness, validate manifests for Automatic, assess cluster for Automatic compatibility, fix deployment for Automatic compatibility, identify AKS Automatic migration blockers, is my cluster ready for AKS Automatic.
Discovers available Azure OpenAI model capacity across regions and projects. Analyzes quota limits, compares availability, and recommends optimal deployment locations based on capacity requirements. USE FOR: find capacity, check quota, where can I deploy, capacity discovery, best region for capacity, multi-project capacity search, quota analysis, model availability, region comparison, check TPM availability. DO NOT USE FOR: actual deployment (hand off to preset or customize after discovery), quota increase requests (direct user to Azure Portal), listing existing deployments.
Interactive guided deployment flow for Azure OpenAI models with full customization control. Step-by-step selection of model version, SKU (GlobalStandard/Standard/ProvisionedManaged), capacity, RAI policy (content filter), and advanced options (dynamic quota, priority processing, spillover). USE FOR: custom deployment, customize model deployment, choose version, select SKU, set capacity, configure content filter, RAI policy, deployment options, detailed deployment, advanced deployment, PTU deployment, provisioned throughput. DO NOT USE FOR: quick deployment to optimal region (use preset).
Unified Azure OpenAI model deployment skill with intelligent intent-based routing. Handles quick preset deployments, fully customized deployments (version/SKU/capacity/RAI policy), and capacity discovery across regions and projects. USE FOR: deploy model, deploy gpt, create deployment, model deployment, deploy openai model, set up model, provision model, find capacity, check model availability, where can I deploy, best region for model, capacity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: listing existing deployments (use foundry_models_deployments_list MCP tool), deleting deployments, agent creation (use agent/create), project creation (use project/create).
Intelligently deploys Azure OpenAI models to optimal regions by analyzing capacity across all available regions. Automatically checks current region first and shows alternatives if needed. USE FOR: quick deployment, optimal region, best region, automatic region selection, fast setup, multi-region capacity check, high availability deployment, deploy to best location. DO NOT USE FOR: custom SKU selection (use customize), specific version selection (use customize), custom capacity configuration (use customize), PTU deployments (use customize).
This skill should be used when working with LaminDB, an open-source data framework for biology that makes data queryable, traceable, reproducible, and FAIR. Use when managing biological datasets (scRNA-seq, spatial, flow cytometry, etc.), tracking computational workflows, curating and validating data with biological ontologies, building data lakehouses, or ensuring data lineage and reproducibility in biological research. Covers data management, annotation, ontologies (genes, cell types, diseases, tissues), schema validation, integrations with workflow managers (Nextflow, Snakemake) and MLOps platforms (W&B, MLflow), and deployment strategies.
Latch platform for bioinformatics workflows. Build pipelines with Latch SDK, @workflow/@task decorators, deploy serverless workflows, LatchFile/LatchDir, Nextflow/Snakemake integration.
Run Python code in the cloud with serverless containers, GPUs, and autoscaling. Use when deploying ML models, running batch processing jobs, scheduling compute-intensive tasks, or serving APIs that require GPU acceleration or dynamic scaling.
Take anthropics/pipeline-review from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.