mcpbeat Sign in

Yield Analysis Skill for Claude

DeFi yield evaluation including fee APR, real vs nominal yield, net APY after costs, and yield sustainability analysis

14k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
5
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
257
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills --skill yield-analysis

The instruction itself

33 sections, as written by the author

Yield Analysis — DeFi Yield Evaluation & Comparison

DeFi yields are often misleading. A pool advertising 200% APY may deliver negative real returns once you account for impermanent loss, gas costs, and emission token depreciation. This skill provides the framework to decompose, evaluate, and compare yield opportunities accurately.

Why Yield Analysis Matters

Most DeFi yield dashboards show nominal yield — the headline number. Real yield requires decomposing that number into its components and subtracting all costs. Without this decomposition:

  • LPs chase high-APY pools that destroy capital through IL
  • Emission-driven yields collapse as reward tokens lose value
  • Gas and rebalancing costs eat into thin margins
  • Opportunity cost is ignored (you could be staking SOL at ~7%)

Yield Components

Every DeFi yield breaks down into one or more of these sources:

1. Trading Fee Income

Swap fees earned by liquidity providers. This is the most sustainable yield source because it comes from real economic activity.

fee_apr = (daily_volume * fee_rate / tvl) * 365
your_daily_fees = daily_volume * fee_rate * (your_liquidity / total_liquidity)

For CLMM pools (concentrated liquidity), fee income is amplified by how tightly you concentrate your range. See the lp-math skill for CLMM mechanics.

2. Token Emissions / Incentives

Protocol reward tokens distributed to LPs. Often the largest component of advertised yields, but frequently unsustainable.

emission_apr = (daily_emission_tokens * token_price * 365) / tvl

The critical question: will the emission token hold its value? If everyone farms and dumps, the token depreciates and actual USD yield is much lower.

3. Lending Interest

Interest earned from lending protocol deposits (Marginfi, Kamino, Solend). Driven by borrowing demand — more sustainable than emissions but fluctuates with utilization.

4. Staking Rewards

Validator staking yield (~7% APR on Solana) or liquid staking token (LST) yield. The baseline risk-free rate for the Solana ecosystem.

Real vs Nominal Yield

| Metric | What It Includes | What It Ignores |

|--------|-----------------|-----------------|

| Nominal APY | Fee APR + emission APR (compounded) | IL, gas, depreciation, risk |

| Real Yield | Everything, net of all costs | Nothing — this is the true return |

Real Yield Formula

real_yield = fee_apr
           + emission_apr × (1 - emission_depreciation)
           - il_cost
           - gas_cost
           - rebalancing_cost

Where:

  • fee_apr: annualized fee income as fraction of position value
  • emission_apr: annualized emission income at current token price
  • emission_depreciation: expected decline in emission token price (0.0 to 1.0)
  • il_cost: expected impermanent loss as annualized rate (see impermanent-loss skill)
  • gas_cost: transaction fees for deposits, withdrawals, claims, compounds
  • rebalancing_cost: for CLMM positions, cost of rebalancing out-of-range positions

Example: SOL-USDC Pool

Nominal APY displayed:    45%
Decomposition:
  Fee APR:               18%
  Emission APR:          30%  (RAY token rewards)
  Emission depreciation: 40%  (RAY down 40% over 30d)
  Effective emission:    18%  (30% × 0.6)
  IL cost (estimated):   12%  (SOL volatile against USDC)
  Gas + rebalance:        1%

Real yield = 18% + 18% - 12% - 1% = 23%

The 45% nominal yield is really 23% after accounting for all factors.

Fee APR Calculation

Constant-Product Pools

fee_apr = fee_rate * daily_volume / tvl * 365

For a pool with 0.25% fee rate, $2M daily volume, and $10M TVL:

fee_apr = 0.0025 * 2_000_000 / 10_000_000 * 365 = 18.25%

Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM) Pools

CLMM fee income depends on your position range relative to trading activity:

# Simplified — see lp-math skill for full CLMM math
fee_apr = fee_rate * daily_volume_in_range / position_liquidity * 365

Tighter ranges earn higher fees per dollar deployed but go out of range more frequently, requiring rebalancing.

Per-LP Share

your_share = your_liquidity / total_pool_liquidity
your_daily_fees = total_daily_fees * your_share

Emission Sustainability

The Death Spiral Pattern

  • Protocol launches with high emission rewards → attracts LPs
  • TVL grows → yield per LP drops → protocol increases emissions
  • LPs farm and dump emission tokens → token price drops
  • Lower token price → lower USD-denominated yield
  • LPs leave → TVL drops → protocol increases emissions further
  • Spiral continues until emissions stop or protocol fails

Sustainability Metrics

# Protocol P/E ratio
pe_ratio = fully_diluted_valuation / annual_protocol_revenue

# Revenue-to-emission ratio (> 1.0 is sustainable)
sustainability = annual_revenue / annual_emission_value

# Token velocity (high = lots of sell pressure)
velocity = daily_emission_selling / daily_token_volume

Interpretation:

  • P/E < 20 and sustainability > 1.0: Likely sustainable yield
  • P/E 20-100 and sustainability 0.3-1.0: Moderate risk
  • P/E > 100 or sustainability < 0.3: Emission-dependent, high risk

Red Flags

  • APY > 100% sourced primarily from emissions
  • Emission token price declining consistently over 30+ days
  • TVL declining while emission rate stays constant or increases
  • Protocol revenue is a small fraction of emission cost
  • No vesting or lockup on emission tokens

Yield Comparison Framework

When comparing yield opportunities, normalize across these dimensions:

1. Same-Asset Basis

Compare like for like. For SOL:

| Strategy | Expected APR | Risk Level | IL Exposure |

|----------|-------------|------------|-------------|

| Native staking | ~7% | Low | None |

| Liquid staking (mSOL) | ~7.5% | Low | Minimal |

| SOL-USDC LP (Orca) | ~15-25% | Medium | High |

| SOL lending (Marginfi) | ~3-8% | Low-Med | None |

| Leveraged yield | ~20-50% | High | Varies |

2. Risk-Adjusted Yield

risk_score = (
    il_risk * 0.3 +
    smart_contract_risk * 0.25 +
    emission_sustainability_risk * 0.2 +
    liquidity_risk * 0.15 +
    protocol_risk * 0.1
)

risk_adjusted_yield = net_apr / risk_score

3. Total Cost Accounting

Include all costs:

  • Impermanent loss (see impermanent-loss skill)
  • Gas fees for all transactions (deposit, withdraw, claim, compound)
  • Opportunity cost (what you could earn risk-free)
  • Smart contract risk premium
  • Rebalancing costs (CLMM positions)

Solana Yield Sources

Liquidity Provision

| Protocol | Pool Types | Fee Tiers | Notes |

|----------|-----------|-----------|-------|

| Raydium | CPMM, CLMM | 0.01-1% | Largest Solana DEX by volume |

| Orca | CLMM (Whirlpool) | 0.01-2% | Concentrated liquidity focused |

| Meteora | DLMM, Dynamic | Variable | Dynamic fee adjustment |

Lending

| Protocol | Assets | Typical APR | Notes |

|----------|--------|-------------|-------|

| Marginfi | SOL, USDC, etc. | 2-10% | Points program active |

| Kamino | SOL, USDC, etc. | 2-12% | Auto-compound vaults |

| Solend | SOL, USDC, etc. | 1-8% | Established protocol |

Staking

| Method | APR | Lock Period | Notes |

|--------|-----|------------|-------|

| Native SOL staking | ~7% | 1 epoch (~2d) | Validator selection matters |

| mSOL (Marinade) | ~7.2% | Instant | Liquid, usable in DeFi |

| jitoSOL (Jito) | ~7.5% | Instant | Includes MEV rewards |

| bSOL (BlazeStake) | ~7% | Instant | Decentralized validator set |

Data Sources

DeFiLlama Yields API (Free, No Auth)

import httpx

# All yield pools
pools = httpx.get("https://yields.llama.fi/pools").json()

# Filter for Solana
solana_pools = [p for p in pools["data"] if p["chain"] == "Solana"]

# Sort by TVL
solana_pools.sort(key=lambda p: p.get("tvlUsd", 0), reverse=True)

Response fields: pool, chain, project, symbol, tvlUsd, apy, apyBase, apyReward, il7d, exposure.

Protocol-Specific APIs

  • Raydium: https://api-v3.raydium.io/pools/info/list
  • Orca: https://api.mainnet.orca.so/v1/whirlpool/list
  • Marginfi: On-chain account data via Solana RPC

Integration with Other Skills

  • lp-math: AMM formulas for fee calculation and position math
  • impermanent-loss: IL estimation for real yield calculation
  • defillama-api: Fetching yield and TVL data across protocols
  • risk-management: Portfolio-level yield allocation decisions
  • position-sizing: How much capital to allocate to yield strategies

Files

References

  • references/yield_math.md — Fee APR, APR/APY conversion, net yield formulas, break-even analysis
  • references/sustainability_analysis.md — Emission sustainability metrics, death spiral patterns, real yield identification

Scripts

  • scripts/yield_calculator.py — Offline yield calculator with fee APR, IL estimation, net yield, break-even, and sensitivity analysis
  • scripts/yield_comparison.py — Fetches DeFiLlama yield data and compares Solana yield opportunities with risk-adjusted ranking

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Protocolsio Integration
by christophacham
×4

Integration with protocols.io API for managing scientific protocols. This skill should be used when working with protocols.io to search, create, update, or publish protocols; manage protocol steps and materials; handle discussions and comments; organize workspaces; upload and manage files; or integrate protocols.io functionality into workflows. Applicable for protocol discovery, collaborative protocol development, experiment tracking, lab protocol management, and scientific documentation.

16k tokens
Tailored Resume Generator
by frostant
×4

Analyzes job descriptions and generates tailored resumes that highlight relevant experience, skills, and achievements to maximize interview chances

3k tokens
Excalidraw Diagram Generator
by github
vendor ×3

Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", or "generate an Excalidraw file". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, and system architecture diagrams. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files that can be opened directly in Excalidraw.

36k tokens scripts
Expo Dev Client
by openai
vendor ×3

Build and distribute Expo development clients locally or via TestFlight

961 tokens
Executing Plans
by ZhanlinCui
×3

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

542 tokens
Anndata
by christophacham
×3

Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.

16k tokens
Benchling Integration
by christophacham
×3

Benchling R&D platform integration. Access registry (DNA, proteins), inventory, ELN entries, workflows via API, build Benchling Apps, query Data Warehouse, for lab data management automation.

14k tokens
Biopython
by christophacham
×3

Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use bioservices.

24k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take agiprolabs/yield-analysis from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.