mcpbeat

Bindcraft

adaptyvbio/bindcraft

> (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.

3k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
3
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
151
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/adaptyvbio/protein-design-skills --skill bindcraft

The instruction itself

15 sections, as written by the author

BindCraft Binder Design

Prerequisites

| Requirement | Minimum | Recommended |

|-------------|---------|-------------|

| Python | 3.9+ | 3.10 |

| CUDA | 11.7+ | 12.0+ |

| GPU VRAM | 32GB | 48GB (L40S) |

| RAM | 32GB | 64GB |

How to run

> First time? See Getting started to set up Modal and biomodals.

cd biomodals
modal run modal_bindcraft.py \
  --input-pdb target.pdb \
  --target-chains A \
  --target-hotspot-residues "45,67,89" \
  --lengths "70,100" \
  --number-of-final-designs 50

GPU: L40S (48GB) | Timeout: 300 min default

Option 2: Local installation

git clone https://github.com/martinpacesa/BindCraft.git
cd BindCraft

# BindCraft is configured with JSON files, not flags
python -u ./bindcraft.py \
  --settings ./settings_target/mytarget.json \
  --filters ./settings_filters/default_filters.json \
  --advanced ./settings_advanced/default_4stage_multimer.json

The target PDB, chains, hotspots, and binder length range are set inside the

--settings JSON. See the BindCraft repo for the settings schema.

Key parameters (Modal wrapper)

| Parameter | Default | Description |

|-----------|---------|-------------|

| --input-pdb | required | Target structure |

| --target-chains | A | Target chain(s) |

| --target-hotspot-residues | "" | Target hotspots (e.g. "45,67,89") |

| --lengths | 50,130 | Binder length range |

| --number-of-final-designs | 1 | Passing designs to return |

| --max-trajectories | none | Cap on trajectories |

Output format

output/
├── design_0/
│   ├── binder.pdb         # Final design
│   ├── complex.pdb        # Binder + target
│   ├── metrics.json       # QC scores
│   └── trajectory/        # Optimization trajectory
├── design_1/
│   └── ...
└── summary.csv            # All metrics

Metrics Output

{
  "plddt": 0.89,
  "ptm": 0.78,
  "iptm": 0.62,
  "pae": 8.5,
  "rmsd": 1.2,
  "sequence": "MKTAYIAK..."
}

Sample output

Successful run

$ modal run modal_bindcraft.py --input-pdb target.pdb --target-chains A --target-hotspot-residues "45,67,89" --number-of-final-designs 50
[INFO] Loading BindCraft model...
[INFO] Target: target.pdb (chain A)
[INFO] Hotspots: 45, 67, 89
[INFO] Generating designs...

Design 1/50:
  Length: 78 AA
  pLDDT: 0.89, ipTM: 0.62
  Saved: output/design_0/

Design 50/50:
  Length: 85 AA
  pLDDT: 0.86, ipTM: 0.58
  Saved: output/design_49/

[INFO] Campaign complete. Summary: output/summary.csv
Pass rate: 32/50 (64%) with ipTM > 0.5

What good output looks like:

  • pLDDT: > 0.85 for most designs
  • ipTM: > 0.5 for passing designs
  • Pass rate: 30-70% depending on target
  • Diverse sequences across designs

Decision tree

Should I use BindCraft?
│
├─ What type of design?
│  ├─ Production-quality binders → BindCraft ✓
│  ├─ High diversity exploration → RFdiffusion
│  └─ All-atom precision → BoltzGen
│
├─ What matters most?
│  ├─ Experimental success rate → BindCraft ✓
│  ├─ Speed / diversity → RFdiffusion + ProteinMPNN
│  ├─ AF2 gradient optimization → ColabDesign
│  └─ All-atom control → BoltzGen
│
└─ Compute resources?
   ├─ Have L40S/A100 → BindCraft ✓
   └─ Only A10G → RFdiffusion + ProteinMPNN

Typical performance

| Campaign Size | Time (L40S) | Cost (Modal) | Notes |

|---------------|-------------|--------------|-------|

| 50 designs | 2-4h | ~$15 | Quick campaign |

| 100 designs | 4-8h | ~$30 | Standard |

| 200 designs | 8-16h | ~$60 | Large campaign |

Adaptyv's own tests of these models showed BindCraft costing about $2.90 per accepted

design, averaged across 7 targets.

Experimental success rate (BindCraft paper): 10 to 100%, averaging 46.3% across 12

targets; strongly target-dependent.


Verify

find output -name "binder.pdb" | wc -l  # Should match num_designs

Troubleshooting

Low ipTM scores: Check hotspot selection, increase designs

Slow convergence: Use fast protocol for screening

OOM errors: Reduce num_models, use L40S GPU

Poor diversity: Lower sampling_temp, run multiple seeds

Error interpretation

| Error | Cause | Fix |

|-------|-------|-----|

| RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory | Large target or long binder | Use L40S/A100, reduce binder length |

| ValueError: no hotspots | Hotspots not found | Check residue numbering |

| TimeoutError | Design taking too long | Use fast protocol |


Next: Rank by ipsae → experimental validation.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take adaptyvbio/bindcraft from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.