Registry Verifier Target A MCP Server

by trycloudflare-emails-ship-peninsula-deliver Your server? Claim it

not responding

Registry Verifier Target A is listed as active in the registry but did not answer our last check.

MCP compatibility and transport verification server.

Uptime history 14 days of history · worst day 0%

14 days agonow

0.0%

Uptime 24h

0 of 92 checks

—

Tools

hidden behind auth

7 ms

Response time

average over 24h

open, no key

Access

streamable-http

Registry Verifier Target A does not always answer

Over the last week it answered 0.0% of our checks. We check every 15 minutes, so you hear about the next outage within the hour — not from your users.

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 3 min ago.

Claude Code Claude Desktop Codex Cursor VS Code

run in your terminal

claude mcp add registry-verifier-target-a --transport http https://emails-ship-peninsula-deliver.trycloudflare.com/mcp-a

Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste this address

https://emails-ship-peninsula-deliver.trycloudflare.com/mcp-a

~/.codex/config.toml

[mcp_servers.registry-verifier-target-a]
url = "https://emails-ship-peninsula-deliver.trycloudflare.com/mcp-a"

.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "registry-verifier-target-a": {
      "url": "https://emails-ship-peninsula-deliver.trycloudflare.com/mcp-a"
    }
  }
}

.vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "registry-verifier-target-a": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://emails-ship-peninsula-deliver.trycloudflare.com/mcp-a"
    }
  }
}

Endpoints

URL	Transport	State	Latency	Checked
https://emails-ship-peninsula-deliver.trycloudflare.com/mcp-a	streamable-http	answering	7 ms	3 min ago

Alternatives to Registry Verifier Target A

same job, measured the same way

Leadloadz

by ali1041

B2B lead search and email verification MCP server

71 installs/wk local only

Tomba MCP Server

by tomba-io

MCP server for Tomba email finder, verification, and contact enrichment API

52 installs/wk 38 tools answering

MCP Registry Monitor

by nirholas

Monitor MCP registry for new servers - Discord Slack notifications alerts

local only

MisarMail MCP Server

by misar-ai

Send transactional email, run campaigns, manage contacts and automations, audit deliverability.

55 tools answering

Emailable

by pipeworx-io

Emailable MCP — wraps the Emailable email verification API (emailable.com)

320 installs/wk 45 tools answering

Domain & Company Intel MCP

by datakoot

Domain intel for AI agents: RDAP registration, DNS, email deliverability, tech stack.

6 tools answering

Reoon

by pipeworx-io

Reoon MCP — wraps the Reoon Email Verifier API (reoon.com)

313 installs/wk 45 tools answering

Qualisend Email Verification

by qualisend

Verify email addresses and clean lists to improve deliverability and sender reputation.

12 tools answering

Registry Verifier Target A — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

Is Registry Verifier Target A working right now?

We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 0 of 92 checks got a reply (0.0%), average response time 7 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.

The registry lists Registry Verifier Target A as active — why does it not respond?

The official MCP registry stores what the author submitted; it does not verify that the server still runs. We check the endpoint ourselves, and this one does not answer. Catalogues that copy the registry without checking will show it as working.

How do I connect Registry Verifier Target A?

Copy the ready config from this page. We generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each in the form that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.

Does Registry Verifier Target A need an API key?

No. Registry Verifier Target A completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.