Compliance Intelligence MCP Server

Get a checkout link for a crosswalk report Returns a payment link for the crosswalk between two frameworks. Released pairs are delivered immediately on payment; any other pair is built to order at the same price. This returns a LINK, it does not take payment. An agent hands the link to whoever it is acting for. No card details pass through the agent. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get a checkout link for a single document compliance review Returns a payment link for a Single Document Compliance Review against one framework. On payment the buyer is emailed a single-use link that opens the same automated pipeline a Professional subscriber uses: upload one PDF or Word document, get back a gap analysis naming every control the document addresses and every one it does not, and a rewritten version drafted against those gaps. This returns a LINK, it does not take payment. An agent hands the link to whoever it is acting for. No card details pass through the agent. It produces draft policy language and a gap list. It does not make anyone compliant, and no tool can: that judgement is an assessor's. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Capital by the business function it targets Where the money went, classified by whose job it changes. Sector labels describe the company; function labels describe the buyer. The second is the only one a reader can act on, which is why the classification is by function throughout. Concentration is reported when one deal carries a bucket, because a total can be arithmetically true and still mislead: one $1B debt facility once accounted for 73% of a function and 38% of a whole week. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

What everything you already hold covers, together Give the frameworks an organisation already holds and one it needs. Returns what they cover TOGETHER, what each one adds that the others do not, and what none of them reaches. No organisation holds one certification, and the marginal number is the one worth knowing: a second and third certification often add far less than expected. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Controls a funded capability actually touches The join. A capability, and the controls whose own text concerns it. Matched against the control's requirement text, never against its title alone: a title that reads like a familiar control is the most expensive kind of wrong match. Returns nothing rather than something strained when the capability finds no purchase, because a join that always finds something is worthless. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Find courses covering several standards at once Given two or more standards, returns courses that address ALL of them together, which is what an organisation running overlapping programmes actually needs. Example: frameworks='SOC 2,ISO 27001' returns courses on running both from one evidence set, rather than one course per standard. Falls back to reporting which standards have coverage if no single course spans them all. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

What one framework already evidences of another Given a framework you already hold and one you are working toward, returns which of the target's controls your existing evidence already covers, which remain as gaps, and the reasoning for every claim. Example: source='SOC 2', target='ISO 27001:2022'. Mappings are derived judgements, not text lifted from either standard, and each has survived an adversarial verification pass. Where no mappings exist between the pair, the response says so explicitly rather than reporting zero coverage, because an absence of data is not a coverage of zero. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get cross-framework coverage report for a framework Returns a coverage analysis showing how many controls in the given framework map to controls in every other framework. Includes total controls, mapped control counts, and coverage percentages per target framework. Use this to understand which frameworks overlap most and plan multi-framework strategies. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Map controls between two compliance frameworks Returns the complete control-to-control mapping between a source and target framework. Each mapping shows which source control maps to which target control(s). This enables multi-framework compliance: satisfy one control to cover requirements in both frameworks. Use exact framework names as returned by agent_search_frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Everything about one crosswalk pair, including what was rejected One framework pair in full: the coverage percentage and how it was arrived at, a sample of the claims that held with the reasoning behind each, and a sample of the claims that were proposed and refuted with the reason each failed. The rejected claims are part of the answer, not an appendix. A coverage number quoted without them is a number nobody argued with. Free, no authentication. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

How do you know this: the grounding behind a crosswalk's claims For any released framework pair, return the reasoning and the provenance behind its mappings: what document each control was verified against, when, who judged the mapping, on what date, and whether it survived an adversarial pass that argued against it. Free, no authentication. A claim you cannot check is worth nothing, so the checking is not the paid part. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

What was claimed and did not hold, with the reason The mappings that were proposed for a pair and then refuted, each with why it failed. Refuted mappings are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was rejected is as inspectable as what survived. This is the check worth running on any coverage claim: a crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get detailed information about a specific control Returns full details for a single control by its code identifier: title, description, domain, and framework. Control codes are framework-specific (e.g. 'A.5.1' for ISO 27001, 'AC-1' for NIST 800-53). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get cross-framework mappings for a control Returns all controls in other frameworks that map to the given control via MAPS_TO relationships. This is the core cross-framework mapping capability: use it to find equivalent controls across different compliance frameworks (e.g. NIST 800-53 equivalents of ISO 27001 controls). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get one course Full detail for a single course by product id, including every standard it covers and its purchase URL. Use after agent_search_courses to justify a recommendation. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get detailed information about a compliance framework Returns comprehensive details about a specific compliance framework: description, jurisdiction, version, domains with control counts, and cross-framework mapping statistics. Use the exact framework name as returned by agent_search_frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get all controls for a compliance framework Returns all controls belonging to a framework, optionally filtered by domain. Each control includes: code, title, description, and domain. For large frameworks (e.g. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5), use the domain filter to narrow results. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get all controls for a framework, naming it as a query parameter Identical to agent_get_framework_controls, taking the framework name as a query parameter instead of a path segment. Use this whenever the framework name contains a forward slash. 84 of the frameworks in the graph do, including CCPA/CPRA, AML/CTF Act 2006 and BSA/AML, and the path form cannot reach any of them: the server decodes %2F back to a real separator before routing, so the request 404s no matter how it is encoded. This route has no such problem and works for every framework. Free, no authentication. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

List standards the catalogue covers Every standard that has courses, with a course count each. Use this to discover valid values for the framework filter before searching. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Framework pairs with a released coverage crosswalk Lists the framework pairs that have a reviewed, signed-off coverage crosswalk, with the coverage figure for each. Call this before agent_coverage_crosswalk to find out which pairs return a number. A pair that is not listed here has not been through review. Asking for it returns an honest 'not released' rather than an unreviewed percentage. Any pair across the any framework pair in the graph can be built to order, one pair being one unit of work. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get platform statistics Returns current platform statistics: total framework count, control count, cross-framework mapping count, and domain count. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Get API pricing and rate limit information Returns current API pricing tiers, monthly call limits, and (if authenticated) your current month's usage. Use this to understand costs before making API calls. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Full-text search across controls and frameworks Search the compliance knowledge graph using full-text search. Type 'controls' searches control titles and descriptions. Type 'frameworks' searches framework names and descriptions. Use specific compliance terms for best results (e.g. 'access control', 'encryption at rest', 'data breach notification'). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Search the course catalogue Find courses by need, framework, role or industry. Free-text search over the catalogue, optionally narrowed to a named standard. Examples: q='soc 2 evidence collection', q='first 90 days as CISO', q='data governance healthcare', or q='audit preparation' with framework='ISO 27001'. Returns up to 25 courses with a direct purchase URL. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Search and list compliance frameworks Search the compliance knowledge graph for frameworks by name, keyword, or jurisdiction. Returns framework metadata including name, description, jurisdiction, domain count, control count, and mapping-partner count. Without a query, returns all frameworks. Use this as the starting point to discover available frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Where a framework meets where the money is going A framework, a function, and the controls where the two meet. This answers the question the brief cannot answer for a reader, because it does not know who they are: money is moving into this capability, and here is what my own standard already asks of me about it. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json

Funded rounds in the current window, filtered The genuine funded rounds, each with its source. Rows are already filtered: rate decisions, analyst price targets, bond issues, buybacks, parked domains, rumoured rounds and figures that were actually valuations are all excluded. The count of what was rejected is returned alongside, so the filtering can be argued with. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json