Garuda runs on your own machine — the client starts it, so there is no endpoint to ping. Last commit 6 Nov 2026.
Impact analysis, architecture rules and a tamper-evident ledger for AI coding agents.
What the code does
We read the source, 20 h ago · rules 995398eba69f
What this server is able to do. For an MCP server this is often the job itself — a terminal server runs commands because that is what it is for. Listed so you know what you are plugging in, not as an accusation.
selfPath = filepath.Join(wd, "bin", "garuda"+ext)
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
return ctx.Err()
default:
}
processed++
if processed > 100 { // Limit for MVP
const proc = cp.spawn(execPath, spawnArgs, {
Is this your server and something here is wrong? Tell us — corrections are free and do not require a plan.
This code can reach further than it looks
We found places where it runs commands, builds paths or queries from values it is given. None of that is a flaw by itself — it becomes one when the code changes, and code changes quietly between releases. We re-read it on every one.
Alternatives to Garuda
same job, measured the same wayAI tech lead for coding agents with validation and impact analysis
Code intelligence platform for AI agents. 20 tools for architecture, security & impact analysis.
A .NET architecture checker that enforces one C# spec and renders the same rules for coding agents.
Code intelligence MCP server — 80+ tools for navigation, impact analysis, and architecture
Evidence-qualified architecture context for coding agents.
Local-first architecture guardrails and project context for JS/TS AI coding agents.
AI Agent with Architectural Memory. Impact analysis (free), tests and code from the graph (pro).
Persistent, evidence-backed project knowledge and task context for coding agents.
Garuda — questions
Answers built from our own checks of this server.