Reach (Google Business Profile) MCP Server

by locus-intelligence Your server? Claim it

not responding

Reach (Google Business Profile) is listed as active in the registry but did not answer our last check.

Hosted Google Business Profile MCP server: reviews, posts, profile edits, Maps rank. OAuth sign-in.

Uptime history 19 days of history · worst day 0%

19 days agonow

0.0%

Uptime 24h

0 of 92 checks

—

Tools

hidden behind auth

95 ms

Response time

average over 24h

open, no key

Access

streamable-http

Reach (Google Business Profile) does not always answer

Over the last week it answered 0.0% of our checks. We check every 15 minutes, so you hear about the next outage within the hour — not from your users.

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 7 min ago.

Claude Code Claude Desktop Codex Cursor VS Code

run in your terminal

claude mcp add reach --transport http https://reach.locus-intelligence.com/api/mcp

Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste this address

https://reach.locus-intelligence.com/api/mcp

~/.codex/config.toml

[mcp_servers.reach]
url = "https://reach.locus-intelligence.com/api/mcp"

.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reach": {
      "url": "https://reach.locus-intelligence.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

.vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "reach": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://reach.locus-intelligence.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Endpoints

URL	Transport	State	Latency	Checked
https://reach.locus-intelligence.com/api/mcp	streamable-http	answering	95 ms	7 min ago

Alternatives to Reach (Google Business Profile)

same job, measured the same way

Google Business Profile MCP

by a1-x-tech

MCP server for Google Business Profile: locations, reviews, local posts and performance metrics.

917 installs/wk local only

Google Business Profile MCP by InsightfulPipe

by insightfulpipe

Hosted Google Business Profile MCP server, with each action switched on or off per account.

answering

OpenGMB

by synectus-opengmb

Manage Google Business Profiles: reviews, posts, hours and rankings, with human approval.

answering

NeatListing

by neatlisting

Manage Google Business Profiles (Google My Business): hours, posts, photos, reviews and insights.

answering

GMaps Lead Finder

by gmapsleadfinder

Scrape Google Maps business leads, reviews, and photos via hosted Remote MCP.

10 tools answering

Local SEO by WorkPods

by workpods

Audit Google Business Profiles, reviews and Maps rankings, and check a site's NAP and schema.

212 installs/wk local only

Google Maps Scraper

by gmapsextractor

Live Google Maps business search, review, and photo data for AI agents over MCP.

answering

NordicMCP — Google Mail

by nordicmcp

Hosted Gmail MCP server: read, search, and manage messages. Google OAuth2 handled by NordicMCP.

answering

Reach (Google Business Profile) — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

Is Reach (Google Business Profile) working right now?

We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 0 of 92 checks got a reply (0.0%), average response time 95 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.

The registry lists Reach (Google Business Profile) as active — why does it not respond?

The official MCP registry stores what the author submitted; it does not verify that the server still runs. We check the endpoint ourselves, and this one does not answer. Catalogues that copy the registry without checking will show it as working.

How do I connect Reach (Google Business Profile)?

Copy the ready config from this page. We generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each in the form that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.

Does Reach (Google Business Profile) need an API key?

No. Reach (Google Business Profile) completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.