COS Monitor MCP Server

by internexio Your server? Claim it

answering

COS Monitor is answering right now. Last checked 3 min ago. It exposes 13 tools.

Scores website pages for communication quality, tracks regressions, surfaces a fix queue.

The linked repository no longer exists on GitHub — it was deleted or made private.

Uptime history 9 days of history · worst day 99%

9 days agonow

100.0%

Uptime 24h

92 of 92 checks

Tools

read from the server

603 ms

Response time

average over 24h

open, no key

Access

streamable-http

COS Monitor missed one check this week

Everything else answered, so this is steady rather than shaky. We check every 15 minutes, which is how a one-off gets told apart from the start of a pattern, and how you hear about the next one within the hour instead of from your users.

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 3 min ago.

Claude Code Claude Desktop Codex Cursor VS Code

run in your terminal

claude mcp add cos-monitor --transport http https://mcp.semalytics.io/mcp

~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cos-monitor": {
      "url": "https://mcp.semalytics.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

~/.codex/config.toml

[mcp_servers.cos-monitor]
url = "https://mcp.semalytics.io/mcp"

.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cos-monitor": {
      "url": "https://mcp.semalytics.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

.vscode/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cos-monitor": {
      "url": "https://mcp.semalytics.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Available tools 13

Read directly from the server with tools/list, grouped by what they act on. If a tool disappears, we record the date.

analyze

analyze_content

Analyze content using all 4 COS frameworks in parallel. Returns comprehensive analysis with: - Overall scores (0-10) for each framework - Dimension breakdowns with weights - Specific recommendations for improvement - Cross-framework insights

analyze_framework

Analyze content using a single specific framework. Faster than full analysis when you only need one perspective. Frameworks: - hape: Engagement Analysis (novelty, relevance, emotional valence) - big_five: Personality Analysis using OCEAN model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) - strategic_clarity: Business message clarity (value prop, differentiation, CTA) - framing_strategy: Cognitive frames and power positioning

analyze_full_comms

Run all 7 COS frameworks in parallel for comprehensive analysis. This is the most thorough analysis option, running: - Core 4: HAPE, Big Five, Strategic Clarity, Sovereign Mind - Extended 3: Persuasion (domain-specific), Platform, Quality Use this when you need complete analysis across all dimensions. Takes longer but provides the most comprehensive view.

analyze_persuasion

Analyze content using domain-specific persuasion frameworks. Each domain has specialized scoring dimensions: - business: B2B/B2C messaging, ROI framing, objection handling - politics: Political messaging, polarization awareness, coalition building - health: Medical accuracy, safety messaging, behavior change (CRITICAL domain) - masculinity: Identity messaging, status signaling, tribe alignment - comedy: Humor mechanics, timing, callback patterns

analyze_platform

Analyze content for platform-specific optimization. Evaluates content against platform constraints and algorithm preferences: - Character limits and formatting rules - Algorithm optimization signals - Engagement pattern recommendations - Platform-specific best practices Supported platforms: twitter, linkedin, email, youtube, tiktok, instagram, facebook, medium, substack, podcast, newsletter, slack, discord

analyze_quality

Analyze content quality across 5 dimensions. Quality dimensions evaluated: - Clarity: Is the message easy to understand? - Coherence: Does the content flow logically? - Correctness: Grammar, spelling, factual accuracy - Completeness: Are all necessary elements present? - Conciseness: Is the content appropriately tight?

audience

audience_profile

Infer OCEAN personality profile from an audience description. Maps a free-text target audience description into a structured psychological profile suitable for personalized outreach (cold email, ads, sales messaging). Returns: - OCEAN scores (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) - ocean_confidence (0.0-1.0) — low when signals are weak - elm_route ("central" | "peripheral" | "mixed") — how the audience processes persuasion - dominant_traits + trait_rationale - dominant_moral_foundations (Moral Foundations Theory) - vulnerability_flags — audiences requiring careful ethics review - recommended_persuasion_principle (Cialdini) + persuasion_rationale Common use: feed a CRM Person/Account description (title, industry, recent signals) to get a psychology-grounded targeting profile for that prospect.

chat

chat

Have a conversation with the COS analysis agent. The agent can help you: - Analyze content interactively - Get recommendations for improvement - Understand framework scores - Configure analysis settings

execute

execute_template

Execute a specific template with provided variables. Templates guide the analysis with pre-defined prompts and variable placeholders. First use get_templates to find available templates and their required variables.

optimize

optimize_email_for_prospect

Generate or refine a personalized cold email for a CRM prospect. Composite tool: combines audience profiling (OCEAN + Cialdini), optional agent profiling from writing samples, draft generation (if no draft is supplied), and persuasion + platform scoring in a single call. Designed for CRM integrations like Clarify, HubSpot, Salesforce — pass a Person/Account context, get back a draft + scoring. Returns: - audience_profile: OCEAN scores, ELM route, Cialdini principle - agent_profile: prospect's writing style (if samples provided) - draft: generated or echoed email body - draft_was_generated: bool — whether COS generated the draft - persuasion + platform: full scoring breakdowns - rewrites: prioritized rewrite suggestions - one_thing: the single most important next step - cialdini_principle: recommended influence principle

profile

profile_agent

Profile an agent's personality from their writing samples. Analyzes 1-10 writing samples (3-5 recommended) to infer the author's Big Five (OCEAN) personality traits, communication style, strengths, blind spots, and persuasion profile. This is the inverse of content analysis — instead of "is this content effective?", it answers "who is this writer based on how they communicate?"

template

get_template_details

Get detailed information about a specific template. Returns the template's: - Name and description - Required and optional variables with types - Categories and tags - Scoring dimensions and weights

templates

get_templates

List available analysis templates. Templates are pre-configured analysis scenarios for common use cases: - Email outreach optimization - LinkedIn post analysis - Sales pitch review - Content marketing assessment

Endpoints

URL	Transport	State	Latency	Checked
https://mcp.semalytics.io/mcp	streamable-http	answering	531 ms	3 min ago

Alternatives to COS Monitor

same job, measured the same way

Agentsnap

by mukundakatta

Snapshot tests for AI tool-call traces: diff, validate, and catch silent regressions.

31 installs/wk local only

Site Spy

by vkuprin

MCP server for Site Spy — lets AI agents monitor websites for changes

63 installs/wk local only

Hypermnesia MCP Viz

by cdeust

Read-only visualization for Cortex memory, knowledge, sessions, traces, and codebase graphs.

95 installs/wk local only

Validoria MCP

by validoria

Continuous website testing by Validoria — monitor security, SEO, performance, and accessibility.

34 installs/wk 74 tools answering

Horizon Fidelity Monitor

by leocelis

Tracks conversation health in real time — drift, desync, and causal collapse — for any AI agent.

answering

InsAIts - AI Communication Security Monitor

by nomadu27

Runtime AI-to-AI security monitor. 23 anomaly types, OWASP MCP Top 10 coverage.

321 installs/wk local only

HostTracker

by hosttracker

Website uptime monitoring: run checks from 300+ locations, manage monitors, alerts and incidents

65 tools answering

Orbilo

by orbilo

Check whether a website is ready for AI agents (UCP, WebMCP, Access) and monitor your own sites.

5 tools answering

COS Monitor — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

What can COS Monitor do?

It exposes 13 tools, read directly from the server on our last check. Among them: analyze_content, analyze_framework, analyze_full_comms, analyze_persuasion, analyze_platform, analyze_quality and 7 more. The full list with descriptions is on this page — we take it from the server itself via tools/list, not from a README. How MCP servers expose tools in the first place →

Is COS Monitor working right now?

We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 92 of 92 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 603 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.

Is COS Monitor still maintained?

The linked repository no longer exists on GitHub — it was deleted or made private. We show this because it changes what you can expect: an unmaintained server may keep answering for months and then stop without warning.

How do I connect COS Monitor?

Copy the ready config from this page — we generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each with the file path that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.

Does COS Monitor need an API key?

No. COS Monitor completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. All 13 of them are readable on this page. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.

How fast is COS Monitor?

It answers our handshake in 603 ms on average, which is faster than 21% of all working MCP servers we measure. That is on the slow side — worth knowing if the tool sits inside an interactive loop. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.