mcpbeat Sign in

Sanctions Screening MCP Server

answering

Sanctions Screening is answering right now. Last checked 4 min ago. It exposes 8 tools. Last commit 22 Sep 2026.

Screen a name or entity against OFAC SDN, the EU Consolidated list and the UK list.

Uptime history 57 days of history · worst day 35%
57 days agonow
100.0%
Uptime 24h
92 of 92 checks
8
Tools
read from the server
652 ms
Response time
average over 24h
0
Stars
last commit 22 Sep 2026

What changed 44

Every tool that appeared, vanished or quietly changed what it asks for. Recorded since 30 August 2026. No other catalogue keeps this.

9 Oct a tool changed version
5 Oct 3 tool descriptions were rewritten map_trade_restriction, screen_sanctions, verify_company_record
5 Oct a tool changed version2 times that day
5 Oct a tool changed the parameters it asks for check_compliance
3 Oct a tool changed the parameters it asks for screen_sanctions
3 Oct a tool description was rewritten screen_sanctions
22 Sep 3 tool descriptions were rewritten check_compliance, map_trade_restriction, screen_sanctions
10 Sep 8 tool descriptions were rewritten check_compliance, get_outcome, get_status and 5 more
10 Sep 4 tools changed the parameters they ask for check_compliance, map_trade_restriction, screen_sanctions and 1 more
6 Sep a tool changed version
and 20 more, back to 30 August 2026

What the code does

We read the source, 4 d ago · tools taken from the live server · rules 995398eba69f

Capabilities

What this server is able to do. For an MCP server this is often the job itself — a terminal server runs commands because that is what it is for. Listed so you know what you are plugging in, not as an accusation.

Runs an external command compliance/jev_advisory.py:354
        proc = subprocess.run(
Dumps the whole environment compliance/jev_advisory.py:336
    env = dict(os.environ)

Is this your server and something here is wrong? Tell us — corrections are free and do not require a plan.

This code can reach further than it looks

We found places where it runs commands, builds paths or queries from values it is given. None of that is a flaw by itself — it becomes one when the code changes, and code changes quietly between releases. We re-read it on every one.

Three servers free · no card

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 4 min ago.

run in your terminal
claude mcp add sanctions-screening --transport http https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/sanctions-screening
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste this address
https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/sanctions-screening
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.sanctions-screening]
url = "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/sanctions-screening"
.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sanctions-screening": {
      "url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/sanctions-screening"
    }
  }
}
.vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "sanctions-screening": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/sanctions-screening"
    }
  }
}

Available tools 8

Read directly from the server with tools/list, grouped by what they act on. If a tool disappears, we record the date.

compliance
check_compliance
Free, instant pre-flight for the compliance gate: runs the SAME TCPA/GDPR/CASL/CAN-SPAM/10DLC checks as send_message and call_business, in preview mode -- nothing is sent, nothing changes. Tells you whether a send would be permitted before you pay, and if not, names the exact rule and how to fix it. De-risks a paid send the way check_booking_link de-risks a paid booking. [free, no key]
map
map_trade_restriction
Free cross-border screening of destination and parties: DOES NOT CLASSIFY THE PRODUCT: echoed back, never checked against export-control lists, so a controlled item to an unrestricted destination returns 'partial', never 'clear'. Not an export-control clearance -- classify HS/ECCN yourself. Never fabricates a tariff rate, a clear, or a restricted status. [free, no key]
outcome
get_outcome
Retrieve the final OutcomeReceipt for a completed operation. [free, no key]
preview
preview_cost
Return an expected cost estimate, latency estimate, and success-probability estimate for a proposed call before execution. Returns the exact price when it is fixed, and a min/max range when the cost depends on channel or outcome. It does not promise an accuracy percentage - check cost_range. [free, no key]
screen
screen_sanctions
Free screening of a name/entity (Latin or Arabic script) against sanctions lists: OFAC SDN (US Treasury), EU consolidated list (European Commission), UK Sanctions List (FCDO). THE UN CONSOLIDATED LIST IS NOT SCREENED -- no licence permits redistribution. Never fabricates a match or clear: check lists_screened; reason_code 'partial_screening' (never 'clear') if any source failed. [free, no key]
self
self_test
Service health probe: runs 6 internal checks and reports how many passed. Confirms the server is up and responding - it does NOT probe each tool individually. Use to verify connectivity before production use. [free, no key]
status
get_status
Query the current state of any in-flight async operation by operation_id. [free, no key]
verify
verify_company_record
Free, live lookup of a company official registry record. Queries the GLEIF global LEI registry (primary, 2.6 million legal entities worldwide) and SEC EDGAR (US public companies) to return the official legal name, LEI, entity status, jurisdiction, registered address, and registry authority. Never fabricates: if the company is not found in these free registries, returns an honest not_found with the sources that were queried. [free, no key]

Endpoints

URLTransportStateLatencyChecked
https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/sanctions-screening streamable-http answering 636 ms 4 min ago

Alternatives to Sanctions Screening

same job, measured the same way
Sanctions & PEP Screening
by macaroonnetwork

Screen a name in one call against US OFAC SDN, the EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List, UK…

142 installs/wk local only
Sanctions Screening (OFAC, EU, UK, UN)
by fairquery

Fuzzy-screen people and company names against OFAC SDN, EU, UK and UN sanctions lists.

answering
Sanctions Screening MCP Server
by cyanheads

Screen names against OFAC, EU, UK, UN sanctions lists; resolve entities via GLEIF. Screening aid.

141 installs/wk 7 tools answering
ScreenSeal
by wthall05

Sanctions screening for AI agents: check a name against OFAC and EU lists. Free during launch.

1 tools answering
OFAC SDN Screening
by bonissystems

Screen a name against the U.S. Treasury OFAC SDN list. Information, not a compliance determination.

2 tools answering
OFACScreen Sanctions Screening
by ofacscreen

Screen names and addresses on US, UN, EU, UK and other sanctions and export-control lists. Free.

5 tools answering
Sanctionlistcheck.com
by sanctionlistcheck

Checks names against OFAC, UK, EU, UN and more sanctions lists; returns scored possible matches.

4 tools answering
Compliance Engine
by alex-dev-web-c-de

Sanctions screening (OFAC/UK/EU/UN) + PEP + GLEIF entities via Compliance Engine.

3 tools answering

Sanctions Screening — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

What can Sanctions Screening do?
It exposes 8 tools, read directly from the server on our last check. Among them: check_compliance, get_outcome, get_status, map_trade_restriction, preview_cost, screen_sanctions and 2 more. The full list with descriptions is on this page — we take it from the server itself via tools/list, not from a README. How MCP servers expose tools in the first place →
Is Sanctions Screening working right now?
We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 92 of 92 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 652 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.
How do I connect Sanctions Screening?
Copy the ready config from this page. We generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each in the form that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.
Does Sanctions Screening need an API key?
No. Sanctions Screening completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. All 8 of them are readable on this page. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.
How fast is Sanctions Screening?
It answers our handshake in 652 ms on average, which is faster than 18% of all working MCP servers we measure. That is on the slow side — worth knowing if the tool sits inside an interactive loop. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.
Is Sanctions Screening open source?
The code is open source: it is published under the MIT licence, written in Python, 0 stars on GitHub and 1 open issue. The licence covers the code in the repository, not the hosted service at hatchloop.dev, which runs on its operator's own terms.