mcpbeat Sign in

MyKIFRS MCP Server

answering

MyKIFRS is answering right now. Last checked 2 min ago. It exposes 6 tools.

Full-text search over K-IFRS/K-GAAP standards and KASB accounting Q&A for Korean accountants

Uptime history 11 days of history · worst day 99%
11 days agonow
100.0%
Uptime 24h
92 of 92 checks
6
Tools
read from the server
1038 ms
Response time
average over 24h
open, no key
Access
streamable-http

What changed 7

Every tool that appeared, vanished or quietly changed what it asks for. Recorded since 15 September 2026. No other catalogue keeps this.

15 Sep 3 tool descriptions were rewritten get_paragraph, get_qna, search_qnas
15 Sep a tool changed version3 times that day
15 Sep a tool changed the parameters it asks for get_qna
and 2 more, back to 15 September 2026

Nothing serious here today

Today is the operative word: we check MyKIFRS every 15 minutes and re-read its code on every release. Watch it and you find out the day that stops being true.

Three servers free · no card

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 2 min ago.

run in your terminal
claude mcp add mykifrs --transport http https://mykifrs.eocpa.kr/mcp
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mykifrs": {
      "url": "https://mykifrs.eocpa.kr/mcp"
    }
  }
}
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.mykifrs]
url = "https://mykifrs.eocpa.kr/mcp"
.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mykifrs": {
      "url": "https://mykifrs.eocpa.kr/mcp"
    }
  }
}
.vscode/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mykifrs": {
      "url": "https://mykifrs.eocpa.kr/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Available tools 6

Read directly from the server with tools/list, grouped by what they act on. If a tool disappears, we record the date.

standards
list_standards
MyKIFRS MCP의 list_standards 도구는 수록된 기준서 카탈로그를 반환합니다. [Purpose] - Which 기준서 are in the corpus, and which numbers feed search_standards' std_num filter. [Usage] 1. "수록된 기준서 전부" → (인자 없음) 2. "감사기준서만" → category="audit" 3. "내부회계관리제도 관련" → category="icfr" [Response] - { count, standards:[{std_num, title, category}] } - category values: kifrs(한국채택국제회계기준) · interpretation(해석서) · concept(재무보고를 위한 개념체계) · kgaap(일반기업회계기준) · audit(감사기준서) · icfr(내부회계관리제도) · esg(KSSB 지속가능성 공시기준) · translation(번역본) · special(특수분야). [Rules] - Lists 수집 성공(crawl_status='ok') 기준서 only — an absent 기준서 means "미수집", not "존재하지 않음". - category is a free-form string, not an enum: an unknown value returns count=0, not an error.
search_standards
MyKIFRS MCP의 search_standards 도구는 K-IFRS·일반기업회계기준·감사기준서·내부회계관리제도·ESG(KSSB) 기준서 본문을 전문검색합니다. [Purpose] - Find the 기준서 문단 grounding a treatment ("사용권자산 손상 is which 문단?"). - For a hit's 원문·문맥, pass its unique_key to get_paragraph. [Usage] 1. "사용권자산 손상 관련 기준" → query="사용권자산 손상" 2. "1116호 안에서만 리스료 재측정" → query="리스료 재측정", std_num=1116 3. "수익 인식 5단계 문단 30개까지" → query="수익 인식 단계", limit=30 [Response] - { hits, results:[{std_num, std_title, category, unique_key, snippet}] } - unique_key = "{std_num}-{문단번호}" (e.g. "1116-33", "1109-6.1.1", "2-2.7") — feed to get_paragraph. - snippet marks matches with ⟦…⟧ and elides with "…". - Empty query returns { error: "검색어가 비어 있음" }. [Rules] - Tokens of ≥3 chars go to FTS (AND-joined, rank-ordered); 1~2 char tokens become LIKE filters. Short-token-only queries work but are ordered by std_num, not relevance. - Body 문단 only (item_type='paragraph') — 제목 rows are excluded, so a hit is always body text. - snippet is a fragment, never the whole 문단 — do not quote it as 기준서 원문.
paragraph
get_paragraph
MyKIFRS MCP의 get_paragraph 도구는 기준서 문단 전문을 앞뒤 문맥과 함께 반환합니다. [Purpose] - To quote a found 문단 exactly — a search snippet is never quotable evidence. - To check 조건절·예외 with neighbors. [Usage] 1. "1116호 33문단 원문" → unique_key="1116-33" 2. "앞뒤로 더 넓게" → unique_key="1116-33", context=5 [Response] - { standard:{std_num, title, category}, target, related_qnas:[doc_number], items:[…] } - items[]: { seq, item_type, unique_key, para_num, level, title, ref, content_text }; item_type "paragraph"=본문, "title"=제목. - related_qnas → get_qna. - Miss → { error: "문단 없음: {unique_key}", similar:[{unique_key, para_num}] } (≤5). [Rules] - unique_key = "{기준서번호}-{문단번호}"; 문단 numbers aren't digits-only (B58·6.1.1) — pass verbatim, never normalize. - Keys can carry a "-N" suffix ("1109-B2.7" misses, "1109-B2.7-1" hits — 12% of 문단). On a miss retry a `similar` candidate; never read it as "the 문단 does not exist". - context expands within one part — boundaries return fewer items; not an error. - Quote content_text, never a snippet.
qna
get_qna
MyKIFRS MCP의 get_qna 도구는 질의회신 전문을 반환합니다. [Purpose] - The 회신 full text for a doc_number (search_qnas, get_paragraph's related_qnas) or a qna_key (search_qnas). [Usage] 1. "2017-001 회신 전문" → doc_number="2017-001" 2. "legacy:6009 전문" → qna_key="legacy:6009" [Response] - { results:[{source, qna_key, doc_number, date, title, rel_stds, full_content, org}] } - Miss → { error: "문서번호 없음: {doc_number}", similar:[{source, qna_key, doc_number, title}] } (≤5 부분일치) or { error: "qna_key 없음: {qna_key}" }. - source / org / rel_stds: same meaning as in search_qnas. [Rules] - results is an array; doc_number is NOT unique ("GKQA03-100" → 2 rows). Never answer from the first row alone — pin one by qna_key. - qna_key = "{source}:{id}" exactly as returned; if both arguments are given, qna_key wins. - 번호 formats differ by series ("2021-G-KQA005" · "GKQA01-085" · "금감원사례-1") — pass the value as received, never alter case or separators. - On a miss, re-ask using `similar` rather than guessing another 번호.
qnas
search_qnas
MyKIFRS MCP의 search_qnas 도구는 회계기준원·금융감독원·신속처리질의·IFRS 해석위원회 질의회신 3,669건을 전문검색합니다. [Purpose] - Official 회신 for practice issues the 기준서 text alone cannot settle. - For 회신 tied to a 문단, get_paragraph's related_qnas is more precise. [Usage] 1. "전환사채 콜옵션 회계처리 질의회신" → query="전환사채 콜옵션" 2. "리스료 재측정 회신 30건" → query="리스료 재측정", limit=30 [Response] - { hits, results:[{source, qna_key, doc_number, date, title, rel_stds, org, snippet}] } - source = 수록 세대 ("v2" 현행 / "legacy" 구 QnA), NOT the 회신 기관. - org = 회신 기관: 회계기준원 / 금융감독원 / 신속처리질의 / IFRS 해석위원회 논의결과 ("구 QnA" = unmapped legacy 유형). - rel_stds is raw HTML: <span data-std="1109" data-id="6.1.1"> → unique_key "1109-6.1.1". [Rules] - Tokens ≥3 chars → FTS (AND, rank); 1~2 chars → LIKE. - Never present `source` as the 회신 기관 — use `org`. - Strip HTML in rel_stds; build 문단 키 from data-std/data-id. - qna_key ("{source}:{id}") is get_qna's single-row handle — use it when doc_number is "" or duplicated. legacy 회신 are mostly 2000~2011 (구 기업회계기준) — check `date` before citing.
usage
get_usage_stats
MyKIFRS MCP의 get_usage_stats 도구는 이 MCP 서버의 도구 사용량 통계를 반환합니다. [Purpose] - Per-tool usage·latency (avg/percentiles)·error rate·daily trend. [Usage] 1. "최근 30일 사용량" → (인자 없음) 2. "지난 7일만" → days=7 3. "전체 기간" → days=0 [Response] - Both tiers: { visibility, period:{days, since, until}, overview:{total_calls, unique_users, errors, error_rate, p50_ms, p90_ms, p99_ms}, by_tool:[{tool, calls, errors, error_rate, avg_ms, p99_ms, users}], by_day:[{day, calls}] } - visibility="public" adds `note`; period.days = "all" when days=0. - visibility="operator" adds users:[{user, is_owner, calls, distinct_tools, first_seen, last_seen, tools:[{tool, calls, avg_ms}]}] and top_targets:[{target, tool, calls, users}]. [Rules] - Tier by requester: admin token·local stdio → "operator", else "public". - users·top_targets exist only at operator tier — absence ≠ 0. - `user` is a truncated SHA-256 of the 접속 토큰 — not a person. stdio calls (no hash) never appear. - Timings = server-side handler time (no network).

Endpoints

URLTransportStateLatencyChecked
https://mykifrs.eocpa.kr/mcp streamable-http answering 3906 ms 2 min ago

Alternatives to MyKIFRS

same job, measured the same way
K
MyFSS
by eocpa

Full-text search over FSS/FSC accounting supervision documents for Korean accounting professionals

5 tools answering
Holded MCP
by energio-es

MCP server for Holded — invoicing, accounting, CRM, projects, and team

65 installs/wk local only
SOAR Record Gateway
by lateos

SOAR security playbooks for AI agents: fetch, full-text search, and count. Metered via Stripe.

answering
SEC EDGAR
by danishashko

SEC EDGAR filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K), XBRL financials, and full-text filing search. No API key.

154 installs/wk local only
RoboSystems
by robosystems

Accounting knowledge graphs: SEC XBRL filings, QuickBooks ledgers, reports and forecasts over MCP.

answering
Xero
by wyre-ai

MCP server for Xero accounting — contacts, invoices, payments, accounts, and financial reports.

local only
Xero
by wyre-technology

MCP server for Xero accounting — contacts, invoices, payments, accounts, and financial reports.

local only
Webull OpenAPI
by webull-inc

MCP server for Webull OpenAPI: trading and market data access for AI assistants

554 installs/wk local only

MyKIFRS — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

What can MyKIFRS do?
It exposes 6 tools, read directly from the server on our last check. Among them: get_paragraph, get_qna, get_usage_stats, list_standards, search_qnas, search_standards. The full list with descriptions is on this page — we take it from the server itself via tools/list, not from a README. How MCP servers expose tools in the first place →
Is MyKIFRS working right now?
We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 92 of 92 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 1038 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.
How do I connect MyKIFRS?
Copy the ready config from this page — we generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each with the file path that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address.
Does MyKIFRS need an API key?
No. MyKIFRS completed a full MCP handshake with us as an anonymous client and listed its tools without asking for anything. All 6 of them are readable on this page. This is what we observed, not what the docs claim.
How fast is MyKIFRS?
It answers our handshake in 1038 ms on average, which is faster than 8% of all working MCP servers we measure. That is on the slow side — worth knowing if the tool sits inside an interactive loop. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.