mcpbeat Sign in

ConsentLayer MCP Server

by consentlayer Your server? Claim it
answering

ConsentLayer is answering right now. Last checked 4 min ago.

Cookie consent for GDPR/CCPA: scan sites for trackers, configure consent banners, get install code.

Uptime history 47 days of history
47 days agonow
100.0%
Uptime 24h
92 of 92 checks
Tools
hidden behind auth
104 ms
Response time
average over 24h
OAuth sign-in
Access
streamable-http

Nothing serious here today

Today is the operative word: we check ConsentLayer every 15 minutes and re-read its code on every release. Watch it and you find out the day that stops being true.

Three servers free · no card

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 4 min ago.

run in your terminal
claude mcp add mcp --transport http https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.mcp]
url = "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
.vscode/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

This endpoint answered with an authorization challenge. The server is running, and it signs you in through your browser: there is no API key to paste.

Endpoints

URLTransportStateLatencyChecked
https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp streamable-http sign-in 97 ms 4 min ago

Alternatives to ConsentLayer

same job, measured the same way
Umbra
by elberacasa

Trust score for AI-generated code: scan repos, guard agent file writes, get a 0-100 score.

71 installs/wk local only
Barcode Scanner
by domdomegg

Scan and generate barcodes and QR codes.

29 installs/wk local only
CodeY CMS
by fpointerdev

Discover, evaluate, install, and validate generated websites for the self-hosted CodeY CMS.

34 installs/wk local only
LeakRank Guard
by prototeemo

Scans code changes for leaked secrets and insecure config, with actionable fixes for AI agents.

56 installs/wk local only
QR for Agent
by benswel

Dynamic QR codes for AI agents — custom styling, scan tracking, webhooks

39 installs/wk local only
Calllint
by calllint

Static preflight safety gate for MCP servers — scan configs before you run them. Never executes.

40 installs/wk local only
Time Tracker AI MCP
by csoai-org

Time Tracker Ai tools for AI agents. Capabilities: start timer, stop timer, get report. Built by

153 installs/wk local only
AEO Scanner
by convrgent

AI visibility for ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude — triple score (AEO+GEO+Agent) with fix code. Free.

181 installs/wk 4 tools answering

ConsentLayer — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

Why is there no tool list for ConsentLayer?
The server answered our handshake with an authorization challenge, so it is running — but it will not describe its tools to an anonymous client. To see them you need to connect with your own credentials. We record it as alive, not as broken: 100.0% of checks in the last 24 hours got a reply.
Is ConsentLayer working right now?
We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 92 of 92 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 104 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.
How do I connect ConsentLayer?
Copy the ready config from this page — we generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each with the file path that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address. You sign in through your browser once and the client keeps the session: no key to copy, and it refuses anonymous clients.
How do you sign in to ConsentLayer?
No API key is involved. ConsentLayer answers our knock with an OAuth challenge, so you authorise it once in your browser and the client keeps the session. That is also why we see no tool list: it will not describe itself to an anonymous client, and that is the server working as intended, not a fault.
How fast is ConsentLayer?
It answers our handshake in 104 ms on average, which is faster than 83% of all working MCP servers we measure. That puts it in the quick quarter of the ecosystem. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.