mcpbeat Sign in

ConsentLayer MCP Server

by consentlayer Your server? Claim it
answering

ConsentLayer is answering right now. Last checked 2 min ago.

Cookie consent for GDPR/CCPA: scan sites for trackers, configure consent banners, get install code.

Uptime history 91 days of history · worst day 93%
91 days agonow
100.0%
Uptime 24h
91 of 91 checks
—
Tools
hidden behind auth
127 ms
Response time
average over 24h
OAuth sign-in
Access
streamable-http

Nothing serious here today

Today is the operative word: we check ConsentLayer every 15 minutes and re-read its code on every release. Watch it and you find out the day that stops being true.

Three servers free · no card

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 2 min ago.

run in your terminal
claude mcp add mcp --transport http https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, then paste this address
https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.mcp]
url = "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
.vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

This endpoint answered with an authorization challenge. The server is running, and it signs you in through your browser: there is no API key to paste.

Endpoints

URLTransportStateLatencyChecked
https://api.consentlayer.com/mcp streamable-http sign-in 87 ms 2 min ago

Alternatives to ConsentLayer

same job, measured the same way
Umbra
by elberacasa

Trust score for AI-generated code: scan repos, guard agent file writes, get a 0-100 score.

74 installs/wk local only
Barcode Scanner
by domdomegg

Scan and generate barcodes and QR codes.

68 installs/wk local only
Sentrint
by sentrint

Code security scanner for founders and small teams: leaked secrets, missing RLS, injection, CVEs

answering
CodeY CMS
by fpointerdev

Discover, evaluate, install, and validate generated websites for the self-hosted CodeY CMS.

41 installs/wk local only
Canadian Grocery Prices for AI Agents (Yugenox)
by arpitgandhi1934

Canadian grocery prices by postal code: Loblaw banners, Instacart, Costco and Flipp weekly flyers.

answering
BarterBanner
by barterbanner

Traffic exchange for independent websites: network stats, members, campaigns and site reports.

4 tools answering
Jev Guide
by mdimamhosen

Set up the JEV model router for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, and install MCP servers.

4 tools answering
LeakRank Guard
by prototeemo

Scans code changes for leaked secrets and insecure config, with actionable fixes for AI agents.

70 installs/wk local only

ConsentLayer — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

Why is there no tool list for ConsentLayer?
The server answered our handshake with an authorization challenge, so it is running — but it will not describe its tools to an anonymous client. To see them you need to connect with your own credentials. We record it as alive, not as broken: 100.0% of checks in the last 24 hours got a reply.
Is ConsentLayer working right now?
We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 91 of 91 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 127 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.
How do I connect ConsentLayer?
Copy the ready config from this page. We generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each in the form that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address. You sign in through your browser once and the client keeps the session: no key to copy, and it refuses anonymous clients.
How do you sign in to ConsentLayer?
No API key is involved. ConsentLayer answers our knock with an OAuth challenge, so you authorise it once in your browser and the client keeps the session. That is also why we see no tool list: it will not describe itself to an anonymous client, and that is the server working as intended, not a fault.
How fast is ConsentLayer?
It answers our handshake in 127 ms on average, which is faster than 87% of all working MCP servers we measure. That puts it in the quick quarter of the ecosystem. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.