Supplier Scorecard

QUALITY - Defect Rate (PPM):
Target: <500 PPM
100 points: 0-250 PPM (excellent)
90 points: 251-500 PPM (good)
75 points: 501-1,000 PPM (acceptable)
50 points: 1,001-2,000 PPM (needs improvement)
25 points: 2,001+ PPM (poor)

DELIVERY - On-Time Rate (%):
Target: 98%+
100 points: 99%+ (excellent)
95 points: 98-99% (good)
85 points: 96-98% (acceptable)
60 points: 94-96% (needs improvement)
30 points: <94% (poor)

COST - Price Per Unit Variance (%):
Target: Contract price (0% variance)
100 points: -2% to 0% (excellent, beating price)
90 points: 0% to +1% (good, at contract)
75 points: +1% to +3% (acceptable, slight overage)
50 points: +3% to +5% (needs improvement)
25 points: +5%+ (poor, significant overage)

SUPPLIER SCORECARD TRENDS - LAST 6 MONTHS

Month | Quality | Delivery | Cost | Service | Overall | Trend
-------|---------|----------|------|---------|---------|-------
Jan | 92 | 94 | 85 | 92 | 90.5 | Baseline
Feb | 94 | 92 | 87 | 93 | 91.2 | Slight up
Mar | 93 | 95 | 88 | 94 | 91.8 | Improving
Apr | 95 | 96 | 90 | 94 | 93.2 | Strong
May | 95 | 95 | 89 | 94 | 92.9 | Sustained
Jun | 95 | 95 | 89 | 94 | 93.75 | Excellent

TREND ANALYSIS:
- Overall score: UP 3.25 points (3.6% improvement)
- Quality: Consistently strong; improving process
- Delivery: Improved from 92% to 95% (positive trend)
- Cost: Slight improvement but watch price increases
- Service: Consistently excellent

ASSESSMENT: Supplier performing well and improving. Recommend continued partnership.

SUPPLIER IMPROVEMENT PLAN - ACME Parts Inc.
Effective Date: March 1, 2024
Duration: 90 days (30/60/90 day reviews)

CURRENT PERFORMANCE:
Overall Score: 72/100 (Below acceptable threshold)
- Quality: 65 (High defect rate: 1,200 PPM vs. target 500)
- Delivery: 72 (On-time rate 93% vs. target 98%)
- Cost: 85 (Acceptable)
- Service: 75 (Slow response times)

SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENT TARGETS:
By 30 days (April 1):
- Defect rate: Down to 900 PPM
- On-time delivery: Up to 95%
- Response time: <12 hours for all inquiries

By 60 days (May 1):
- Defect rate: Down to 700 PPM
- On-time delivery: Up to 96.5%
- Service satisfaction: 4.2/5 or higher

By 90 days (June 1):
- Defect rate: Down to 500 PPM (target)
- On-time delivery: Up to 98% (target)
- Overall score: 80+ (acceptable minimum)

ACTION ITEMS:
1. Root cause analysis: Why defect rate high? (Due: March 8)
2. Quality improvement plan: Specific fixes (Due: March 15)
3. Production schedule review: Can they meet 98% on-time? (Due: March 15)
4. Staffing assessment: Adequate resources? (Due: March 15)
5. Weekly touchpoints: Verify progress (Every Monday)

SUPPORT FROM US:
- Dedicated account manager (assigned: Sarah Kim)
- Quarterly business reviews (instead of annual)
- Shared visibility to demand forecast
- Technical support if needed

ESCALATION PATH:
- 30-day mark: If not meeting targets, escalate to suppliers' VP
- 60-day mark: If still missing targets, consider alternate suppliers
- 90-day mark: If overall score <75, begin transition to new supplier

SIGNATURE:
Our Company: _________________ Date: _________
ACME Parts Inc.: _________________ Date: _________

TIER 1 - STRATEGIC PARTNERS (5-10% of suppliers, 60-80% of spend)
Examples: Primary component supplier, sole-source materials
Approach: Collaborative, long-term partnership
Frequency: Quarterly business reviews + monthly operational check-ins
Governance: Dedicated account managers; joint planning
Investment: Joint improvement projects, shared risk/reward

TIER 2 - PREFERRED SUPPLIERS (20-30% of suppliers, 15-30% of spend)
Examples: Alternative suppliers, secondary components
Approach: Performance-based, competitive incentives
Frequency: Quarterly business reviews; monthly scorecard reviews
Governance: Account manager; escalation path defined
Investment: Annual benchmarking; selective improvements

TIER 3 - TRANSACTIONAL (60-70% of suppliers, <10% of spend)
Examples: Commodity suppliers, spot purchases
Approach: Cost-focused, minimal relationship investment
Frequency: Annual performance review
Governance: Procurement team manages
Investment: Minimal beyond scorecard tracking

EXAMPLE SCORECARD WEIGHTS BY TIER:
Metric | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3
--------|--------|--------|--------
Quality | 35% | 30% | 20%
Delivery | 30% | 25% | 25%
Cost | 15% | 30% | 40%
Service | 15% | 10% | 10%
Compliance | 5% | 5% | 5%

(Tier 1: Invest in quality; Tier 3: Optimize for cost)

AGENDA (30-minute call):
1. Overall score review (5 min)
   - Congratulate on improvements
   - Flag any concerns

2. Category deep-dives (15 min)
   - Quality: Any issues to address?
   - Delivery: On track for month?
   - Cost: Any challenges?

3. Improvement initiatives (5 min)
   - What's working well?
   - What needs focus next month?
   - Support needed from us?

4. Relationship/feedback (5 min)
   - How's our partnership?
   - Any concerns from their side?
   - Schedule next meeting

TONE: Collaborative problem-solving, not punitive

QBR AGENDA (60 minutes):
1. Business update (10 min)
   - Company/product roadmap
   - Market changes
   - Volume forecast

2. Supplier performance (10 min)
   - Scorecard trends (6-month view)
   - Achievements and improvements
   - Challenges/red flags

3. Strategic initiatives (15 min)
   - Joint projects (cost reduction, quality improvement)
   - Product development opportunities
   - Supply chain optimization

4. Planning (15 min)
   - Next quarter demand forecast
   - Capacity planning
   - Any risks/constraints?

5. Relationship/closing (10 min)
   - Feedback exchange
   - Commitment to next quarter
   - Action items and owners

DOCUMENTATION: Distribute meeting notes within 24 hours; track action items

- Overall scorecard drops below 75 for 2 consecutive periods
- Quality: Defect rate increases >50% from baseline
- Delivery: On-time rate falls below 90%
- Cost: Price increases >5% without notice
- Service: Response time >48 hours or SLA breach
- Compliance: Any regulatory/safety violation
- Financial: Public evidence of financial distress
- Relationship: Loss of key account manager or technical support

ESCALATION NOTIFICATION:
Send formal letter to supplier's VP/President documenting:
- Performance metrics below acceptable threshold
- Business impact to our organization
- Required improvements and timeline
- Consequences if not addressed (supplier review, transition)
- Offer to collaborate on improvement plan

ESCALATION RESOLUTION:
- Executive-level commitment to improve
- Detailed action plan with weekly updates
- If not improving: Begin transition to alternate suppliers