w95/ma-due-diligence
ACTIVATE when evaluating acquisition targets, conducting M&A due diligence, planning integration strategy, analyzing synergies, preparing sale materials, assessing culture fit, valuing targets, creating merger checklists, or managing M&A transactions. Critical for executives involved in buy-side or sell-side M&A, from initial target evaluation through post-acquisition integration.
npx skills add https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill ma-due-diligence
M&A transactions are among the highest-stakes decisions an executive makes. This skill enables you to conduct rigorous due diligence on acquisition targets, evaluate strategic fit and synergies, plan comprehensive integration strategies, manage transaction risks, and execute successful post-merger integration. Use this skill whenever you're evaluating targets for acquisition, preparing your company for sale, negotiating M&A terms, or planning post-merger integration.
Target Screening Framework
Develop clear criteria for acquisition targets:
ACQUISITION CRITERIA CHECKLIST
STRATEGIC FIT
├─ Does it fill a capability gap we can't build in <2 years?
├─ Does it expand our total addressable market?
├─ Does it accelerate entry to new market segment?
├─ Does it strengthen competitive moat?
├─ Does it align with long-term strategy?
FINANCIAL PROFILE
├─ Revenue size: $[X]M - $[Y]M?
├─ Growth rate: [X%]+ YoY?
├─ Profitability: [X]% EBITDA margin or path to profitability?
├─ Price range: [X]-[Y]x revenue or [X]-[Y]x EBITDA?
├─ Required capital allocation: <[X]% of our cash?
CUSTOMER & MARKET
├─ Target customer overlap: [X]% (synergies potential)
├─ New customer segments: How many? How big?
├─ Market growth rate: [X]%+ annually?
├─ Competitive intensity: Low/medium/high?
├─ Customer concentration: Top 10 customers = ?% of revenue
TECHNOLOGY & IP
├─ Core technology differentiation: Yes/No?
├─ Patent portfolio: Valuable/Standard/Expired?
├─ Technical debt: Manageable/Significant/Blocker?
├─ Development capability: Strong/Medium/Weak?
├─ Architecture fit with our platform: High/Medium/Low?
PEOPLE & CULTURE
├─ Key person dependencies: <[X]?
├─ Engineering team quality: Hire/Integrate/Reduce?
├─ Sales team effectiveness: Keep/Integrate/Replace?
├─ Cultural compatibility: High/Medium/Low?
├─ Retention risk of key talent: <[X]%?
LEGAL & COMPLIANCE
├─ Litigation history: Clean/Minor/Significant?
├─ Regulatory compliance: Strong/Needs work/Red flags?
├─ IP rights: Clear/Potential disputes/Blocker issues?
├─ Material contracts: Any unfavorable terms?
├─ Data privacy (GDPR, etc.): Compliant/At risk?
Initial Scoring Model
Create a weighted scoring sheet:
ACQUISITION TARGET SCORECARD
Criteria Weight Score Weighted
────────────────────────────────────────────
Strategic Fit 25% 8/10 2.0
Financial Profile 25% 7/10 1.75
Customer/Market 20% 9/10 1.8
Technology 15% 7/10 1.05
People/Culture 10% 6/10 0.6
Legal/Compliance 5% 8/10 0.4
────────────────────────────────────────────
TOTAL SCORE 100% 7.6/10
Interpretation:
9-10: Strong buy candidate (pursue diligence)
7-8: Good candidate (evaluate further)
5-7: Requires risk mitigation (negotiate terms)
<5: Pass (not strategic fit)
Financial Deep Dive
Analyze target's financial health and trajectory:
Revenue Analysis:
Profitability & Unit Economics:
Cash Flow Analysis:
Forecast Review:
Valuation Analysis:
Build a valuation model with multiple approaches:
VALUATION MODEL FRAMEWORK
1. COMPARABLE COMPANY ANALYSIS
Identify 3-5 public comparable companies
├─ Revenue multiple: [X]x to [Y]x
├─ EBITDA multiple: [X]x to [Y]x
├─ Discount for private company: -[X]% liquidity discount
└─ Implied valuation range: $[X]M - $[Y]M
2. PRECEDENT M&A TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
Identify 5-10 similar M&A transactions
├─ Transaction multiples (by revenue, EBITDA, ARR)
├─ Year of transaction (adjust for time)
├─ Strategic vs. financial buyer
└─ Implied valuation range: $[X]M - $[Y]M
3. DCF (DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW)
Build 5-year financial projection
├─ Conservative case: $[X]M valuation
├─ Base case: $[Y]M valuation
├─ Upside case: $[Z]M valuation
├─ Discount rate: [X]% (WACC, risk-adjusted)
└─ Terminal growth: [X]%
4. WALK-AWAY PRICE
├─ Our valuation: $[X]M
├─ Their likely ask: $[Y]M
├─ Max we'll pay: $[Z]M ([X]x revenue multiple)
└─ Synergy cushion: [X]%
Key Financial Red Flags:
Customer Due Diligence
Understand the target's customer relationships:
Customer Concentration Analysis:
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION RISK
Top 10 Customers = ?% of Revenue
├─ >60%: VERY HIGH RISK
│ └─ Any customer loss = major revenue impact
├─ 40-60%: HIGH RISK
│ └─ Churn assumptions critical
├─ 20-40%: MODERATE RISK
│ └─ Manageable with good retention
└─ <20%: LOW RISK
└─ Diversified customer base
Customer Health Assessment:
Contract Analysis:
Sales Process & Funnel:
Market Positioning:
Technology Assessment
Evaluate the technical platform and innovation capability:
Product Architecture:
Technical Debt:
Intellectual Property:
Product Roadmap:
Technical Red Flags:
Talent Assessment
Evaluate the team and cultural fit:
Key Person Identification:
Organizational Structure:
Employee Satisfaction & Culture:
Compensation & Benefits:
People Red Flags:
Legal Risk Assessment
Conduct comprehensive legal review:
Contracts & Commitments:
Intellectual Property:
Compliance & Regulation:
Litigation & Disputes:
Material Contracts:
Legal Red Flags:
Identify & Quantify Synergies
Build detailed synergy case:
SYNERGY IDENTIFICATION FRAMEWORK
REVENUE SYNERGIES
├─ Cross-sell: [Product A] to Target's [Customer Segment]
│ └─ Estimated: [X] customers × $[Y] ARPU = $[Z]M
├─ Upsell: Upgrade existing Target customers to [our offering]
│ └─ Estimated: [X]% penetration × $[Y] uplift = $[Z]M
├─ Market expansion: [Target's] product in [our market]
│ └─ Estimated: [X]% TAM capture = $[Z]M
├─ Bundling: Discount for combined offering
│ └─ Estimated: [X] enterprise deals × $[Y] bundle = $[Z]M
└─ TOTAL REVENUE SYNERGIES: $[X]M annual
COST SYNERGIES
├─ Elimination: Sales, G&A, R&D overlap
│ └─ Estimated savings: [X] FTE × $[Y] = $[Z]M
├─ Infrastructure: Combined servers, hosting, telecom
│ └─ Estimated savings: [X]% of combined costs = $[Z]M
├─ Vendor leverage: Combined purchasing power
│ └─ Estimated savings: [X]% procurement reduction = $[Z]M
├─ Location consolidation: Close redundant offices
│ └─ Estimated savings: [X] rent/overhead = $[Z]M
└─ TOTAL COST SYNERGIES: $[X]M annual
STRATEGIC SYNERGIES (harder to quantify)
├─ Competitive positioning strengthened
├─ Time-to-market advantage (e.g., faster product roadmap)
├─ Technology platform acceleration
├─ Talent and capability acquisition
├─ Market share gains through combined entity
└─ ESTIMATED VALUE: $[X]M
TOTAL SYNERGY VALUE: $[X]M annually
Payback on premium: [X] years
Synergy Realization Plan:
For each major synergy:
Conservative vs. Optimistic:
Note: Most companies overestimate synergies. Use 60% of identified synergies in your valuation model.
Pre-Acquisition Checklist
PRE-ACQUISITION APPROVAL CHECKLIST
[ ] Strategic Rationale
[ ] Fills clearly identified capability gap
[ ] Accelerates market entry or expands TAM
[ ] Strengthens competitive position
[ ] Aligned with 3-5 year strategy
[ ] Financial Analysis Complete
[ ] Valuation models built (3 approaches)
[ ] Walk-away price determined
[ ] Purchase price ≤ $[X] (board-approved max)
[ ] Synergies identified and modeled conservatively
[ ] Impact on profitability/cash flow analyzed
[ ] Customer Due Diligence
[ ] Reference calls with 10+ customers completed
[ ] Customer concentration risks identified
[ ] Top customer retention plans in place
[ ] Churn assumptions validated
[ ] Technical Due Diligence
[ ] Technology assessment completed
[ ] Architecture scalability evaluated
[ ] Security and compliance review done
[ ] IP infringement risks assessed
[ ] Integration complexity understood
[ ] People & Organization
[ ] Key person retention plans drafted
[ ] Organizational structure designed
[ ] Redundancy/cost reduction identified
[ ] Cultural fit assessment complete
[ ] Integration team assigned
[ ] Legal & Compliance
[ ] Material contracts reviewed
[ ] Litigation/disputes assessed
[ ] IP/patent review completed
[ ] Regulatory compliance issues identified
[ ] Data privacy assessment done
[ ] Board Approval
[ ] Acquisition rationale presented
[ ] Synergy model and risks discussed
[ ] Valuation and pricing approved
[ ] Integration plan reviewed
[ ] Financing strategy approved (if raising capital)
[ ] Final Decision
[ ] CEO and Board sign-off on acquisition
[ ] Price and terms finalized
[ ] Exclusivity period begins
[ ] Legal counsel engaged for transaction
Pre-Close Checklist
PRE-CLOSE VERIFICATION
[ ] Financial Statements
[ ] Audited financial statements current
[ ] No material adverse changes since diligence
[ ] Receivables and inventory quality verified
[ ] Undisclosed liabilities assessed
[ ] Contracts
[ ] All material contracts identified
[ ] Change of control consents obtained or waived
[ ] Customer and vendor notifications planned
[ ] Material adverse change definition and triggers
[ ] Intellectual Property
[ ] IP ownership verified and clear
[ ] Patent registration and renewals current
[ ] Open source audit completed
[ ] No known infringement risks
[ ] Regulatory & Compliance
[ ] All required regulatory approvals obtained
[ ] Data privacy compliance verified
[ ] Industry-specific licenses/approvals obtained
[ ] No pending regulatory investigations
[ ] Employees
[ ] Retention agreements signed with key personnel
[ ] WARN Act notices (if required) issued
[ ] Equity holder consents obtained
[ ] Key employee communications prepared
[ ] Conditions to Close
[ ] All defined conditions satisfied or waived
[ ] Third-party consents obtained
[ ] Representations and warranties verified
[ ] No material adverse change occurred
[ ] Documentation
[ ] Purchase agreement finalized
[ ] Closing documents prepared
[ ] Representations and warranties insurance in place
[ ] Financing confirmed (if applicable)
[ ] Board approval of final terms
Immediate Actions:
Integration Planning:
Customer & Vendor:
People:
System & Process Integration:
Synergy Realization:
Progress Tracking:
Top 5 M&A Integration Risks:
Use this skill to evaluate M&A opportunities rigorously, negotiate favorable terms, and execute successful integrations that deliver anticipated synergies and strategic value.
Take w95/ma-due-diligence from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.