Pricing Page Psychology Audit

Pricing Page Psychology Audit

Scrape any SaaS pricing page and audit it against 12 proven pricing psychology

principles. Get a scored Markdown report with specific rewrite suggestions per

tier and a "Top 3 Quick Wins" section.

Step 1: Get the Target URL

Ask the user:

"Which SaaS pricing page should I audit? Share the full URL

(e.g. https://linear.app/pricing)"

If no URL is provided, stop and ask. Do not proceed without a valid URL

starting with http:// or https://.

Step 2: Run the Scraper

Run the scraper script with the URL:

python scripts/scrape_pricing.py "URL_HERE"

The script outputs structured text to stdout. Capture the output — it contains:

• Page title
• All visible text content
• Button labels (CTAs)
• Plan names and prices
• Feature list items

If the script fails (timeout, blocked, invalid URL), tell the user:

"The page could not be scraped: [error]. Try a different URL or check

if the site blocks bots."

Step 3: Evaluate Against 12 Psychology Principles

Analyze the scraped content against each principle. For each, assign:

• ✅ Pass — clearly present and well-executed
• ⚠️ Needs Work — present but weak or could be improved
• ❌ Missing — not present at all

The 12 Principles:

• Anchoring — Is there a high-priced plan shown first or prominently to

make others feel cheaper?

• Decoy Effect — Is there a middle-tier plan designed to make the top

tier look like better value?

• Loss Aversion Framing — Does copy use "don't miss out", "limited",

"you'll lose access" rather than purely gain language?

• Feature-vs-Value Naming — Do plan names/descriptions highlight

outcomes ("Close more deals") vs just features ("10 seats")?

• Social Proof Placement — Are testimonials, logos, or user counts

shown near pricing tiers (not just on a separate page)?

• Urgency / Scarcity Signals — Is there a countdown timer, limited

spots badge, or "offer ends" language?

• Plan Naming Psychology — Are plan names aspirational

(Starter/Growth/Scale) vs generic (Basic/Pro/Enterprise)?

• CTA Button Copy — Do CTAs say action-outcome ("Start growing free")

vs generic ("Sign up" or "Get started")?

• Free Trial vs Freemium Framing — Is the free offer framed clearly?

Does it reduce friction or create confusion?

10. Price Ending Tactics — Do prices end in 9 ($49, $99) for perceived

value, or round numbers ($50, $100) for premium feel?

11. Visual Hierarchy of Tiers — Is the recommended/popular plan visually

highlighted (badge, border, size difference)?

12. Guarantee / Trust Signal Presence — Is there a money-back guarantee,

"no credit card required", or security badge near the CTA?

Step 4: Generate the Audit Report

Output the report in this exact Markdown structure:

# Pricing Page Psychology Audit
**URL:** [URL]
**Audited on:** [today's date]
**Overall Score:** X/12 principles passing

---

## Audit Results

### 1. Anchoring — ✅ Pass / ⚠️ Needs Work / ❌ Missing
**What we found:** [1-2 sentences from the page]
**Suggestion:** [Specific rewrite or change to make]

[Repeat for all 12 principles]

---

## 🏆 Top 3 Quick Wins

These are your highest-leverage changes, prioritized by impact vs effort:

**Quick Win #1 — [Principle name]**
Current: "[exact copy from page]"
Rewrite to: "[your improved version]"
Why: [1 sentence on the psychological mechanism]

**Quick Win #2 — [Principle name]**
...

**Quick Win #3 — [Principle name]**
...

Step 5: Self-QA Before Output

Check before presenting the report:

• [ ] All 12 principles are scored (none skipped)
• [ ] Each "Suggestion" is specific — no generic advice like "add social proof"
• [ ] Quick Wins cite actual copy from the page (not invented)
• [ ] Scores reflect what is literally present in the scraped content
• [ ] Date is today's actual date

Fix any violation before output.

Step 6: Offer Follow-ups

After presenting the report, offer:

• "Export this as a PDF-ready Markdown file"
• "Generate rewrite copy for all CTAs on this page"
• "Compare against a competitor's pricing page"
• "Build a prioritized action plan for the dev team"