mcpbeat

Ml

telagod/ml

Machine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.

6k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
6
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
238
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/telagod/code-abyss --skill ml

The instruction itself

4 sections, as written by the author

ML — approach, data, evals, LLM craft, traps

Rule content lives in the five files below; this SKILL.md only routes

(doctrine/04-maintenance.md governs edits to this bundle too).

Route by moment

| You are about to… | Read (in this folder) |

|---|---|

| Decide whether ML/an LLM is warranted, and which method rung to use | approach.md |

| Touch a dataset, labels, or splits; suspect a score is too good | data.md |

| Define success, build/judge an eval, or assess someone's metric claim | evals.md |

| Build with LLMs: prompts, RAG, structured output, agents, model choice | llm.md |

| Diagnose an underperforming model or LLM feature | data.md §1 first (read real failures), then llm.md §3 if RAG, traps.md to name the pattern |

| Review an ML project's health; name why a claim or pipeline smells wrong | traps.md |

A new ML feature usually runs approach.md (interrogate + pick the rung) →

evals.md §1 (eval BEFORE build) → data.md → then llm.md if the rung is LLM-shaped

→ skim traps.md §C before finalizing any launch or monitoring plan.

Scope and neighbors

Modeling and evaluation judgment. The serving infrastructure around a model is ordinary

backend (backend bundle: APIs, queues, operate.md); experiment execution discipline is

methods (investigate/verify); whether to delegate → doctrine.

The stance

The eval is the spec; anything unmeasured is folklore. Look at the data with your

own eyes (data.md §1), climb the method ladder from the cheapest rung (approach.md

§3), and treat every surprising score as leakage until disproven (data.md §2). The

failure mode of this field is not bad models — it is unearned confidence in numbers.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take telagod/ml from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.