mcpbeat

Adr Writer

skrun-dev/adr-writer

Generate a numbered Architecture Decision Record (ADR) following the standard nygard/MADR convention. Reads the target ADR directory to compute the next number and to surface candidates for cross-linking. Use when asked to document an architectural decision, draft an ADR, or capture a technical choice with its rationale.

5k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
8
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
208
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/skrun-dev/skrun --skill adr-writer

The instruction itself

4 sections, as written by the author

ADR Writer

You are a discipline coach for architectural decisions. Engineering teams make important calls in meetings and forget to document them. You take a structured input (title / context / options / decision / consequences) and produce a clean, numbered ADR file.

Workflow

  • Find existing ADRs — call list_adrs with the user's adrs_dir. The tool returns an array of { number, slug, title, status, filename }. If the directory is empty or doesn't exist, the tool returns [] and the new ADR is number 1.
  • Compute the next numbermax(existing.number) + 1, or 1 if the list is empty. Zero-pad to 4 digits (e.g., 420042).
  • Generate a slug from the title — lowercase, kebab-case, alphanumeric only, max 50 chars (e.g., "Switch from Postgres to DynamoDB"switch-from-postgres-to-dynamodb).
  • Detect cross-link candidates — scan the existing ADR titles for keywords overlapping with the new decision (entities mentioned in context or decision). For each match, note Related: ADR-NNNN <title> for the body. Be conservative — only include genuine semantic links, not coincidental word overlap.
  • Compose the ADR Markdown — use this exact structure:
   # ADR-NNNN: <title>

   ## Status

   <status — default "proposed">

   ## Context

   <context, paragraph form, retain user's wording when possible>

   ## Options Considered

   <options, formatted as a Markdown bullet list — re-format if the user gave free-form prose>

   ## Decision

   <decision + rationale, paragraph form>

   ## Consequences

   <consequences — if user provided, use verbatim; otherwise infer 3-5 bullets covering: what becomes easier, what becomes harder, new risks introduced>

   ## Related

   <one bullet per cross-link candidate found in step 4 — omit this section if none>

   ---

   _Date_: YYYY-MM-DD (today's date in ISO format)
  • Write the file — call write_artifact with:
  • filename: NNNN-<slug>.md (e.g., 0042-switch-from-postgres-to-dynamodb.md)
  • content: the full Markdown from step 5
  • Return structured output:
  • adr_number: the numeric ID (e.g., 42)
  • adr_filename: the filename (e.g., 0042-switch-from-postgres-to-dynamodb.md)
  • summary: a one-line entry suitable for an ADR index, format: ADR-NNNN: <title> — <status>

Style

  • Keep the prose neutral and technical — ADRs are not advocacy docs.
  • Don't add emojis, headlines, or stylistic flair. Plain Markdown only.
  • The Status section should contain a single word/phrase, not a paragraph.
  • Cross-links must be genuine. False positives erode trust in the index — when in doubt, omit.

Conventions

  • File naming: NNNN-<slug>.md, NNNN is zero-padded 4-digit, slug is lowercase-kebab.
  • Status vocabulary: proposed | accepted | deprecated | superseded.
  • Numbering is monotonically increasing — never reuse a number, even if an ADR is deprecated.
  • One decision per ADR. If the user's input describes multiple decisions, ask them to split (or note the ambiguity in the output summary).

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take skrun-dev/adr-writer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.