mcpbeat

Improve Architecture

rohitg00/improve-architecture

Audit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.

640 tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
2755
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/rohitg00/pro-workflow --skill improve-architecture

The instruction itself

4 sections, as written by the author

improve-architecture

Invest in the shape of the system a little at a time rather than paying for a

rewrite later. This skill diagnoses and proposes; it does not rewrite on its own.

Method

  • Map first. Get the current shape before judging it - entry points,

modules, data flow, who calls whom. Reuse module-map for the one-screen

view; do not skip to opinions.

  • Find the strain. Look for the load-bearing problems, not style nits:
  • God modules that everything imports and nothing can change safely.
  • Leaky boundaries - a module reaching into another's internals instead of

its surface.

  • Duplicated logic that drifts (the same rule implemented three ways).
  • Wrong seams - the code is split where it does not bend and fused where it

does.

  • Cyclic dependencies.
  • A shape that fights the domain (see domain-modeling - boundaries in code

should track boundaries in the language).

  • Propose the smallest move. For each problem, the least change that

relieves it: extract a boundary, collapse a duplicate, invert a dependency,

move a seam. Prefer a sequence of safe steps over one big cut.

  • Rank by leverage. Order the moves by pain relieved over effort. Say which

are safe now and which need a test net first (pair with tdd).

  • Record the big calls. For a structural change a future reader would

question, write a decision record in docs/decisions/NNNN-slug.md: context,

choice, alternatives rejected, why.

Guardrails

  • Diagnose, do not rewrite. The deliverable is a plan the user approves before

any code moves.

  • No churn for taste. A move must relieve a named strain; "cleaner" is not a

reason.

  • Three similar lines beat a premature abstraction - do not trade duplication

for indirection unless the duplication actually drifts.

  • Keep behavior fixed. Structural moves are refactors; land them behind green

tests.

Output

A prioritized list: each item is the problem, the smallest move, the risk, and

whether it needs a test net first. Plus decision records for the big moves. No

code changes until the user picks what to do.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take rohitg00/improve-architecture from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.