posthog/triaging-error-issues
> Triage PostHog error tracking issues during a daily or on-call review. Use when the user asks "what's broken?", "what new errors do we have?", "show me top errors today", "what should I look at this morning", or wants a prioritized list of active issues to work on. Surfaces new and high-impact issues, ranks by users affected and recency, points at linked replays, and proposes next actions (investigate, assign, suppress, merge).
npx skills add https://github.com/PostHog/skills --skill triaging-error-issues
When a user asks "what's broken?" or wants a daily error review, the goal is a short
prioritized list of issues worth a human's attention — not a dump of every active
issue. Most projects have hundreds of active issues; the few that matter are usually
new (first seen in the last 24-48h), spiking, or affecting many distinct users.
| Tool | Purpose |
| ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| posthog:query-error-tracking-issues-list | List + rank issues with aggregate metrics (occurrences, users, sessions) |
| posthog:query-error-tracking-issue | Compact details for a single issue (status, assignee, top frame, release) |
| posthog:query-error-tracking-issue-events | Sampled $exception events with stack, URL, browser, and $session_id |
| posthog:query-session-recordings-list | Find replays of users hitting an issue |
| posthog:inbox-reports-list | Pre-curated actionable signals if the project uses Inbox |
Read the time window from the user's wording. Defaults if unspecified:
dateRange: { date_from: "-24h" }-7d-24hPick what "matters" means:
orderBy: "first_seen", orderDirection: "DESC", tight window.Catches regressions introduced by recent deploys.
orderBy: "users" ranks by distinct users affected. Better thanraw occurrences for severity (one bot loop produces many occurrences but one user).
orderBy: "occurrences" over a short window vs a longer baselineto spot spikes.
Start narrow and widen if too few issues come back:
posthog:query-error-tracking-issues-list
{
"status": "active",
"orderBy": "users",
"orderDirection": "DESC",
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-24h" },
"limit": 20,
"volumeResolution": 24
}
Match volumeResolution to the window (24 buckets for -24h, 14 for -14d, etc.)
so each row's sparkline has enough resolution to show a spike vs flat steady state.
A single bucket only gives a total, not a shape.
For new-issues-only, run a parallel query with orderBy: "first_seen":
{
"status": "active",
"orderBy": "first_seen",
"orderDirection": "DESC",
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-24h" },
"limit": 10
}
If a project mixes browser and server SDKs, the top-by-users list is usually drowned
by server-side errors (each invocation often gets a fresh distinct_id). Narrow with
the library filter — values match the SDK's $lib, not the npm package name, examples:
web — posthog-js (browser)posthog-node, posthog-python, posthog-ruby, posthog-go, posthog-php, posthog-java, posthog-elixir — server SDKsposthog-edge — Cloudflare Workers / edge runtimeposthog-ios, posthog-android, posthog-react-native, posthog-flutter — mobileThe list will include known noise. Before presenting, drop or call out:
lives with them. Surface them only if they're in the top by users.
flag for suppression (suppressing-noisy-errors) instead of triage.
If unsure whether an issue is new vs. recurring, compare first_seen to the start
of the window:
first_seen inside the window → new, worth attentionfirst_seen weeks ago but spiking now → regression worth attentionfirst_seen weeks ago, flat volume → background noiseFor the top 3-5 candidates, pull a sample exception so the summary includes a stack
frame and URL, not just a title. Use posthog:query-error-tracking-issue-events rather than
raw SQL — it returns normalized fields ($exception_types, $exception_values,
$current_url, browser/OS, $session_id) and defaults to onlyAppFrames: true to
strip vendor noise from the stack:
posthog:query-error-tracking-issue-events
{
"issueId": "<issue_id>",
"limit": 1,
"verbosity": "stack"
}
If the user wants to see what users were doing, hand off to finding-replay-for-issue
to pick the best linked recording. Don't fetch replays for every triaged issue — only
the ones the user asks to dig into.
Lead with a one-line headline ("3 new issues in last 24h, 1 spike, 5 active
high-impact"). Then a short table sorted by your chosen signal:
| Issue | First seen | Users | Sessions | Sample message | Suggested action |
| ----- | ---------- | ----- | -------- | --------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| ... | 2h ago | 142 | 198 | TypeError ... at checkout.js:42 | Investigate |
| ... | spike | 67 | 89 | Network request failed | Watch — likely transient |
| ... | 3d ago | 12 | 12 | chrome-extension:// timeout | Suppress (extension noise) |
For each, suggest one of: investigate (investigating-error-issue), assign
(error-tracking-issues-partial-update), suppress (suppressing-noisy-errors),
merge (grouping-noisy-errors), or resolve if it's already known fixed.
share a properties.$lib_version (or properties.$exception_releases when the
SDK is configured to populate it), present them grouped — a rollback decision
rests on the cluster, not any one issue.
without a real distinct_id concept, fall back to sessions or occurrences.
user decide. Bulk actions belong in dedicated skills.
posthog:inbox-reports-list), check it first — PostHogmay have already curated the most actionable issues so you avoid re-deriving them.
/error_tracking/<id>) for each row so the user can jumpstraight to the issue page if they want to drill down themselves.
Take posthog/triaging-error-issues from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.