mcpbeat

Creating Replay Vision Scanners

posthog/creating-replay-vision-scanners

Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
57
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/PostHog/skills --skill creating-replay-vision-scanners

The instruction itself

10 sections, as written by the author

Creating Replay Vision scanners

A scanner is a standing LLM probe over session recordings. Once created and enabled, it runs on a

Temporal schedule that sweeps every 5 minutes, applying its prompt to each new matching recording and

recording the result as an observation (a queryable $recording_observed event). Each observation counts

against a monthly org quota (a fixed number of observations per calendar month).

That schedule is exactly why creation needs a gut-check: a scanner with a permissive query and full sampling

starts consuming quota automatically and can drain the whole month's budget within its first few sweeps.

Creation itself does not check quota — that protection only kicks in at observation time, by which point

the budget may already be gone.

Core principle: size before you ship

Never create an enabled scanner blind. Estimate its volume, check remaining quota, and — when the projected

volume is a meaningful fraction of what's left — show the user the numbers and get confirmation before

creating. This is the heart of the skill; the rest is supporting detail.

The flow

Step 1: What should the scanner do?

Pick a scanner_type and write its scanner_config. Every type needs a prompt; the rest is type-specific:

| Type | What it produces | scanner_config shape |

| ------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| monitor | Open-ended observation against a prompt (e.g. "flag rage clicks") | {"prompt": "..."} |

| classifier | Assigns tags from a fixed label set | {"prompt": "...", "tags": ["tag-a", "tag-b"]}tags needs ≥1 entry; optional "multi_label": true, "allow_freeform_tags": false |

| scorer | Numeric score on a rubric | {"prompt": "...", "scale": {"min": 1, "max": 5, "label": "frustration"}}min < max; label optional |

| summarizer | Free-text summary; optional facet embeddings for search | {"prompt": "..."}; optional "length": "short" \| "medium" \| "long" (default "medium"), "emits_embeddings": false |

scanner_type is locked after creation — to change it you delete and recreate, so confirm the type is

right up front, and get the scanner_config shape right (a wrong shape is a create error, not a silent

default).

If the user's intent makes the type and prompt obvious, just proceed — don't interrogate them.

Step 2: Which sessions?

The query is a RecordingsQuery shape that selects which recordings the scanner watches. date_from and

date_to are ignored (the schedule controls time), so don't bother setting them. Narrow the query to the

sessions that actually matter — by event, URL, person property, duration, etc. A narrow query is the single

biggest lever on cost.

sampling_rate (0..1, default 1.0) is a random downsample applied _after_ the query matches. Lower it to

trade coverage for budget.

Step 3: Size it — the gut-check (do not skip)

Before creating, run both checks and reason about them together:

  • Estimate volume — call vision-scanners-estimate-create with the proposed query + sampling_rate.

It returns matched_sessions_in_window, the window_days measured, and

estimated_observations_per_month.

  • Check budget — call vision-quota-retrieve for remaining and exhausted against the org's monthly

monthly_quota.

Then decide:

  • If estimated_observations_per_month comfortably fits within remaining, proceed.
  • If it's a large fraction of (or exceeds) remaining, stop and tell the user the concrete numbers

— e.g. "This scanner is projected to produce ~X observations/month; you have Y of Z left this month." —

and confirm before creating, or suggest tightening the query or lowering sampling_rate first.

  • If the org is already exhausted, say so — a new enabled scanner won't produce anything until the quota

resets, and its observations will be silently skipped.

Confirmation here is a conversation step, not an API capability — surface the trade-off and let the user

choose. When the projected volume is clearly small relative to the budget, you don't need to ask.

Step 4: Create

Call vision-scanners-create. Minimal example:

{
  "name": "Rage click monitor",
  "scanner_type": "monitor",
  "scanner_config": { "prompt": "Flag sessions where the user repeatedly clicks the same element in frustration." },
  "query": { "kind": "RecordingsQuery", "events": [{ "id": "$rageclick", "type": "events" }] },
  "sampling_rate": 1.0,
  "model": "gemini-3-flash-preview",
  "enabled": true
}

name must be unique within the team. Set enabled: false if the user wants to create it paused (no

schedule, no quota consumption) and turn it on later.

After creation

  • Show the scanner's PostHog URL from the response so the user can review it in the UI.
  • Results take a few minutes to appear (rasterizing the recording to video + the LLM call are slow). Inspect

them with vision-scanners-observations-list for one scanner over time, or vision-observations-list

(requires session_id) for every scanner's findings on a single session. To dig into a recording, hand off

to the investigating-replay skill.

Updating an existing scanner

vision-scanners-update is a partial update — send only changed fields. **Re-run the Step 3 gut-check

whenever you widen scope**: a broader query or a higher sampling_rate raises the sweep volume just like a

fresh broad scanner would. Toggling enabled, tweaking the prompt, or narrowing the query don't need a

re-estimate. Editing config bumps scanner_version; past observations keep a snapshot of the old config.

Gotchas

  • One observation per (scanner, session). Re-running a scanner on a session it already observed — even a

failed or ineligible one — is a no-op and won't produce a fresh scan.

  • Ineligible ≠ failed. Observations can land ineligible (e.g. too_short, no_recording) — a terminal

non-error outcome. Check error_reason when triaging why a scanner produced nothing.

  • Provider/model are Google/Gemini only in the current version.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take posthog/creating-replay-vision-scanners from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.