oaustegard/claude-assessing-impact
>- Pre-change blast-radius report for a symbol or file. Walks tree-sitting references, augments with a plain-text scan over non-parsed files (configs, plain docs), and clusters affected sites by feature (`_FEATURES.md`) or top-level package. Use when about to refactor, rename, or delete something in a repo you don't own — "what breaks if I change `validateUser`", "who calls this", "is this safe to remove", "where is this used", "blast radius", "impact analysis". This is the CONVERGENT pre-change risk skill — for "what is this repo?" use exploring-codebases; for "where is X?" use searching-codebases.
This is a copy. The original lives at oaustegard/assessing-impact.
npx skills add https://github.com/oaustegard/claude-skills --skill assessing-impact
Cheap, ad-hoc impact analysis for a single target. Not a graph database —
a focused walk over an AST cache plus a complementary text scan, clustered
into a report that's easy to summarize.
Use this when you're about to refactor / rename / delete a symbol in
a repo you don't work in daily, and you want a single artifact that says:
"these N files will need to change, in these M packages, with these tests
likely affected."
Don't use this for deep ongoing impact analysis on your own codebase
— stand up GitNexus, SourceGraph, or your IDE's index. This skill is for
the one-shot case.
uv venv /home/claude/.venv 2>/dev/null
uv pip install --python /home/claude/.venv/bin/python tree-sitter
export PYTHON=/home/claude/.venv/bin/python
export IMPACT=/mnt/skills/user/assessing-impact/scripts/impact.py
The script depends on the tree-sitting skill — it imports engine.py
directly. The bundled grammars live with tree-sitting; no separate
language-pack install needed.
$PYTHON $IMPACT /path/to/repo SYMBOL_NAME
Or target a whole file:
$PYTHON $IMPACT /path/to/repo path/to/module.py
The script prints a structured markdown report. Treat it as input for
your final summary, not the deliverable. It deliberately doesn't assign a
"high/medium/low" risk label — that's your job, after weighing:
If a particular package looks suspicious, follow up with tree-sitting
to read the actual call sites:
TREESIT=/mnt/skills/user/tree-sitting/scripts/treesit.py
$PYTHON $TREESIT /path/to/repo --no-tree 'source:caller_function'
| Flag | Default | Purpose |
|------|---------|---------|
| --features PATH | _FEATURES.md | Root _FEATURES.md — when present, refs get clustered by feature in addition to by package. |
| --skip DIRS | (defaults from tree-sitting) | Extra comma-separated dirs to skip. |
| --limit-per-name N | 500 | Cap refs per symbol name. Bump if you suspect truncation. |
| --json | off | Emit JSON instead of markdown — for downstream tooling. |
# Impact Report: <target>
## Target
Kind, definition sites with line ranges.
## Direct & Textual References (N total)
Top-line counts, then refs grouped by:
- Code references by package
- Test references
- Documentation mentions
## Affected Features (from _FEATURES.md) ← only if file present
Feature name → ref count + file count.
## Suggested Test Surfaces
Test files that already reference the target, plus tests neighboring
the definition. Likely the regression net for the change.
## Caveats
What the scan can't see (dynamic dispatch, cross-language, cross-repo).
exploring-codebases if the repo also has a freshlygenerated _FEATURES.md — the impact report will cluster refs by
feature, which makes the blast radius story much more legible than
raw package directories.
tree-sitting to drill specific call sites once impact hasidentified them.
searching-codebases when you want regex/AST search over thesame corpus rather than impact analysis on a known target.
type-resolved call edges. Common names (run, init, handler) will
pick up unrelated symbols. Prefer running this on distinctive names;
otherwise expect noise and read the snippets.
getattr, duck-typedmethod calls, virtual dispatch in C++) is missed or over-matched.
handler over HTTP appears as zero refs — they're not in the same AST.
packages, sibling services) are invisible. For multi-repo impact,
reach for GitNexus / SourceGraph.
acceptable cost (~700ms scan + sub-ms queries) for a few hundred files.
Diff → affected-symbols extraction is a planned follow-up.
scripts/impact.py — Single-entry CLI. Resolves target → walks ASTrefs → augments with text scan → clusters by package and (optionally)
by feature → renders markdown or JSON.
Take oaustegard/claude-assessing-impact from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.
The instructions reference pip, uv.
Without those the skill loads but fails at the first command.